Once again, if any of you that are reporting problems have not reported them to the NHTSA, please do so. There is more pressure with higher numbers. If you have reported before, but had a repeated incident, report that one, too. Also, I urge you to get your Spyder to a dealer if you have not done so. Whatever anyone thinks of BRP, remember that they cannot troubleshoot and figure out the problems if they don't have the broken Spyders in hand.
Again, :agree:. I thought we had my problem licked with the GPS change out. System was working flawlessly, then two days ago (about 800 miles after the GPS change out) it started slowly going downhill. Dealer called BRP the minute he got off the phone with me and called me back about 10 minutes later. BRP is recommending a DPS change out. Dealer has put part on order. When it first started on Wednesday, it was only 2 or 3 times at highway speeds and was so slight as to make one wonder if it was really acting up. Yesterday it was sticking every time I turned just left of center at highway speeds and then once as I was straightening up after I turned into a parking lot. However, today system was acting up extremely intermittently again and only at highway speeds.
Now, for those of you bashing BRP let me tell you, that kind of failure is a total PITA to trouble shoot. You can't fix/trouble shoot an issue that ain't there
at that moment! Trust me, I have spent many a cold night or blazing hot afternoon on a flight line chasing an issue that the pilots have seen multiple times but we as mechanics can only get to duplicate about every 5th time we run the system, if we're lucky.
Another thing to consider, a few times in my 20+ years of troubleshooting/fixing aircraft (and automobiles for that matter) I have run across instances where one component was "taking out" another component and vice versa. In other words, change out component A because trouble shooting led one to that component, it
was bad, but the reason it was bad was because a bad component B damaged it. Now component B shows up as being bad finally so it is changed, but before it was changed it damaged component A again. Now component A fails, change component A, but before it was changed it had damaged component B again....wash, rinse, repeat. Finally we wound up having to change both component A and B and the same time. Viola, the system
finally works.
Is that what is going on here? I don't know, but I am willing to give BRP the benefit of the doubt. Yes their statements are crafted by lawyers, but then what major corporations aren't?
And for those of you holding Toyota up as the paragon of how a corporation should respond to an issue....Toyota's issue has been know about since 1999, and was reported by no less than State Farm in 2002, but nothing was done until
just now?! I think BRP has done more in the last year to try and figure this issue out than Toyota did in those 10 years.
OK, enough of
my ranting.