2013 Can-Am Spyder RT Safety Recall - Elevated Temperature in Engine Compartment

[ekfraz]

trade

I would be ok with them trading my 2013 for a 2014.

 

[IdahoMtnSpyder]

She says the bike is a '13 STS...

That answers it then. That is not the upcoming RT fix, at least as far as we know since BRP hasn't let the cat out of the bag yet about what the fix is.

 

[SpyderAnn01]

I wonder if that's what happened here in the first place. The tests may have simply been done in colder weather, so nobody caught the issue and since the engine that was intended for that frame had more power nobody figured that the older engine would actually create more heat?

The only thing I know is that I run a business and no matter what I do something I didn't even see as a potential problem jumps up and bites me in the ass.

I believe that the early test riders said they were tested in Canada. Not a great place to find heat issues.

The 2013s were tested by Spyder owners in Canada, I'm sure that BRP conducted testing at their site in Arizona also. I hope that they use the test site in the summer and not just in the winter. But who knows.

 

[Roadster Renovations]

Here is a better picture of that panel...

 

[MouthPiece]

My guess is that we'll know for sure in May.

Chris

 

[jcthorne]

Guys, those photos of of the 2014 Spyder ST and the updated panels were made available to 13 ST model owners last year. Old news other than something similar may be in the works for the RT.

 

[jcthorne]

so what if they were willing to give you .... let's say $5k plus your bike for a 14. Would that work?? Seems to me that would cost them a lot less plus every owner should expect some deprecation.

I would accept an offer to trade up for a 2014 or 15 for $5k additional. It would also cost me the $$ for blue paint but I'd live with that.

 

[jcthorne]

Also, several members have been told by the dealer that the upgrades have already been done. If one is available, I would like to get a parts list to them to give them some ammo with their dealers.

As it stands, I would do at least exactly what the article and BRP says about prolonged idling and cool down before going into an enclosed area. Makes a lot of sense to me...

As is usual for the CanAm dealers, they have not a clue. They can't even be bothered to read the letters BRP sent them. As for the idling, that is a traffic condition, not a choice. If my bike catches fire because it cannot idle in Houston traffic, I am NOT accepting responsibility for improperly using the bike. The recommendation on not riding the bike in conditions above 85 deg or in slow traffic is useless unless they plan to issue loaner bikes in the southern climates. I am not parking our 2013s until May or June when the 'fix' might be available. BRP just does not get it. They seem to expect me to continue making payments on the bikes.......

 

[cuznjohn]

if this new fix is extensive the dealers are not going to be happy. i am pretty good friends with my dealer and when he changed out my ignition switch he showed me how much time BRP wrote for doing it and it was no where near what it took him to do it. so i am sure a high volume spyder dealer won't mind too much but a dealer that only sells a few units a year is going to hurt doing the fix.

 

[ekfraz]

high temps

I am in Houston, Texas, it is a traffic nightmare like many major cities with the exception of temps being above 85 degrees probably 75% of the year with high humidity and our rush hours are usually about 6 - 7 hours a day. so if I want to ride my Spyder I cannot follow BPR'S ride under light non stopping for long periods of time in slow or stop and go traffic which is a way of life here. I already had an incident where it got so hot that the water hoses blew and a wrecker had to come get it and take it to the dealer. Hot weather will be here soon so I hope they get their fix soon!!!!!

 

[robmorg]

if this new fix is extensive the dealers are not going to be happy. i am pretty good friends with my dealer and when he changed out my ignition switch he showed me how much time BRP wrote for doing it and it was no where near what it took him to do it. so i am sure a high volume spyder dealer won't mind too much but a dealer that only sells a few units a year is going to hurt doing the fix.

:agree: John, I have no problem believing you are absolutely correct about that. But it seems to be typical of most warranty payments. Manufacturers seem to believe that dealers and franchises should share in their losses. I can tell you from my own experience that it happens frequently in service industries also.

 

[ARtraveler]

so what if they were willing to give you .... let's say $5k plus your bike for a 14. Would that work?? Seems to me that would cost them a lot less plus every owner should expect some deprecation.

It will be interesting to see what transpires if there is any type of buy-back. No matter what the terms, I can still see not everyone happy. The pain and suffering proponents will kick in then.

Maybe an engine change? Were the 2013's made to be equipped with the 1330 at first? That would still be very expensive, but not as bad as a full buy-back.

IMO: I do not see a buy back as being the final option.

:bbq::bbq::bbq:

 

[robmorg]

Maybe an engine change? Were the 2013's made to be equipped with the 1330 at first? That would still be very expensive, but not as bad as a full buy-back.

IMO: I do not see a buy back as being the final option.

I agree that there will not be any sort of buyback. And an engine upgrade, even if it were possible, would also be way too expensive. Obviously, if either of those were in the works, the current interim recall notice on the 2013's would not have been issued at this time.

IMO, what seems the most likely solution under consideration is body panel changes, a fan or two, some changes in the fuel system, and some other minor tweaks.

 

[Bob Denman]

:agree: But... it's still all just a guessing game right now. :dontknow:

 

[cuznjohn]

the picture of the vents that were posted looked really nice, but having said that they still won't help in stop and go traffic. personally i really don't see a good fix for the problem. i fell this is a attempt to quiet the government for a lil just to say they are trying. i still don't see how some bikes have the problem and some don't.

has any of the problem bikes been checked for vin numbers to see it the bikes with heat problems came out of the same batch of bikes made in a certain amount of time, could there have been a problem with a batch of engines made during a period that the specs were off but not enough to trash the lot so they were installed in bikes and the others engines were corrected ???. we will soon find out I GUESS

 

[anthony422]

I spoke to this Darren guy from BRP personally I've spoke to him before, don't care for the guy.... he seemed like he was reading from a card, and quite frankly couldn't give a crap,, the only thing he had to say was they are committed to fixing it and that's what they will do. he made it clear there are no buyback no special deals no special pricing what you get is what everyone gets. And if you had a few really crappy riding seasons with their toaster oven he basically said in a nutshell...to damn bad. we will fix it and if you want to sell it go see your dealer. The guy knew we had the conversation about the hot bike and he played dumb so I said so what do you have to say to yourself now.......no comment, once again it was like talking to a wet cardboard box

 

[cuznjohn]

brp outlook on issues

 

[jcthorne]

the picture of the vents that were posted looked really nice, but having said that they still won't help in stop and go traffic. personally i really don't see a good fix for the problem. i fell this is a attempt to quiet the government for a lil just to say they are trying. i still don't see how some bikes have the problem and some don't.

has any of the problem bikes been checked for vin numbers to see it the bikes with heat problems came out of the same batch of bikes made in a certain amount of time, could there have been a problem with a batch of engines made during a period that the specs were off but not enough to trash the lot so they were installed in bikes and the others engines were corrected ???. we will soon find out I GUESS

My RT and the wifes RT were at opposite ends of the 2013 production run. Both have the exact same symptoms. With our help they are not so bad to ride now but the fuel stench is as bad as always.

 

[robmorg]

My RT and the wifes RT were at opposite ends of the 2013 production run. Both have the exact same symptoms. With our help they are not so bad to ride now but the fuel stench is as bad as always.

JC,

Most of the work I've had done was aimed at reducing the heat around the seat and, more importantly, reducing the heat applied to the fuel tank. In some cases, the same "fix" helped both. I seem to have successfully eliminated the fuel stench, but I won't know for sure until this summer. (Work I've done is listed in "My Mods" link in my sig.)

Of course I realize that I live in Pennsylvania and you live in Texas. That makes a BIG difference. I firmly believe location is the main reason we get so many varying reports about the severity of the problem from various 2013 RT owners.

 

[jcthorne]

JC,

Most of the work I've had done was aimed at reducing the heat around the seat and, more importantly, reducing the heat applied to the fuel tank. In some cases, the same "fix" helped both. I seem to have successfully eliminated the fuel stench, but I won't know for sure until this summer. (Work I've done is listed in "My Mods" link in my sig.)

Of course I realize that I live in Pennsylvania and you live in Texas. That makes a BIG difference. I firmly believe location is the main reason we get so many varying reports about the severity of the problem from various 2013 RT owners.

We have done most of the same items. Some I took further. There is still just too much heat applied to the tank.

I think the fuel varies from different areas of the country as well but don't know which are worse as far as fuel vapor pressure.