-
There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.
What would you choose? Spyder vs Ryker
- Thread starter delkhouri
- Start date
https://www.cycletrader.com/listing...-6-speed-manual-with-reverse-(SM6)-5003149400
It is a bit far... There are a couple F3's in ohio (close to me) for $14.4
That's a great deal, too bad it's in NC.
yeah its about a 5-6 hour drive. the ones in ohio (close to me) for $14.4 are probably a better option. With the ryker Rally, I would need to add a passenger seat and or a saddle bag or case so I would have room to carry a few things (like rain gear) The Spyder in the link already has a rear seat and a usuable frunk. I guess I just wanted to know for only $2-2500 extra is their any reason someone shouldn't just pick the f3 over the ryker other than price.
Again it is all moot for me as I am not in a position to buy anything right now, just wanted to hear others thoughts.
I just chose the 2019 Ryker Rally over the 2019 base F3. I test rode the F3 base and the Ryker 900 several times, my dealer said feel free to ride either of his demo’s until my Rally is ready (s/b Sat).
The F3 felt a bit more plush than the Ryker, it also felt larger but didn’t bring anything to the table worth $5,000 more to my needs. I don’t really need the larger engine or additional cargo options and the ground clearance/gvwr capacity are basically the same. The Ryker also felt a bit more stable in turns, maybe just perception coming from 2 wheels.
I bought The Rally, not the standard Ryker, the $1,000 delta between those models was worth it to me for the included upgrades to the suspension, seat pan, bump skid, etc. If the F3 base was $1,500 over the Rally I might have considered it more seriously but I mostly ride 2 lane country roads and rarely go over 65-70 mph unless on the interstate. I also like that the Rykers have shaft drive vs a belt, given the road conditions where I ride.
In the end I could have rationalized either the F3 or the Ryker but I found the Ryker more fun to ride.
The F3 felt a bit more plush than the Ryker, it also felt larger but didn’t bring anything to the table worth $5,000 more to my needs. I don’t really need the larger engine or additional cargo options and the ground clearance/gvwr capacity are basically the same. The Ryker also felt a bit more stable in turns, maybe just perception coming from 2 wheels.
I bought The Rally, not the standard Ryker, the $1,000 delta between those models was worth it to me for the included upgrades to the suspension, seat pan, bump skid, etc. If the F3 base was $1,500 over the Rally I might have considered it more seriously but I mostly ride 2 lane country roads and rarely go over 65-70 mph unless on the interstate. I also like that the Rykers have shaft drive vs a belt, given the road conditions where I ride.
In the end I could have rationalized either the F3 or the Ryker but I found the Ryker more fun to ride.
Thanks for the insight. I have not rode the F3 but I did ride they Ryker Rally, and that's what I ordered. Seems production is lacking. Dealers cant keep them.
I know you were super excited about the ryker when it was announced. Your plan was to sell/trade in your F3 and just have the Ryker as it met your needs and weren't driving long distances etc. Why did you end up keeping both and if you HAD to keep only one which would you keep and why.
My wife liked my Spyder and found it easy for her to ride. She had been considering getting a 300cc+ scooter but the stability of the Ryker made more sense. My wife is in love with her Ryker. She rides without timidity on the Ryker which is something she lacked on 2 wheels. I have found ite Ryker to be a Hoot. It is lighter, simpler and generally a bit sportier than the F3L.
I really like the F3L which I will use for touring and towing my Time Out camper. It is just different tools for different jobs.
I just saw a craigslist ad from the DC area... according to the ad the have some healthy discounts on 2018 spyder models, including this:
"2018 Can-am Spyder:
F3 Spyder, all colors- $12,777"
They also have some decent discounts on other spyder models. I didn't want to post the link as I cannot vouch for the prices or dealer and posting links is probably not allowed anyway.
Too bad DC is 6-7 hours away and that I can't afford it right now. But if they are indeed selling them for that price it's really close the the ryker rally price.
"2018 Can-am Spyder:
F3 Spyder, all colors- $12,777"
They also have some decent discounts on other spyder models. I didn't want to post the link as I cannot vouch for the prices or dealer and posting links is probably not allowed anyway.
Too bad DC is 6-7 hours away and that I can't afford it right now. But if they are indeed selling them for that price it's really close the the ryker rally price.
Rob Rodriguez
New member
When I've called on similar ads they have the listed price but then is $900 shipping fee and $300 prep and , etc. I'm not saying you can't buy the bike for the listed price I'm just saying in my experience they start adding BS fees when you show interest in buying.
MakoShark2
Member
Completely different trikes, one is good for touring other is great for urban driving.
Beside that, the relevant numbers (Spyder 1330 vs Ryker 900):
0-60mph: ~4.8s vs ~6s
MPG: ~30-40mpg vs ~25-35mpg
Coverage: ~249mi vs ~158mi
Service: 9300mi vs 6000mi
but then a base Spyder with a minimum set of farkles will cost you almost twice a Ryker.
So I guess the choice will depend on type of usage and budget.
Beside that, the relevant numbers (Spyder 1330 vs Ryker 900):
0-60mph: ~4.8s vs ~6s
MPG: ~30-40mpg vs ~25-35mpg
Coverage: ~249mi vs ~158mi
Service: 9300mi vs 6000mi
but then a base Spyder with a minimum set of farkles will cost you almost twice a Ryker.
So I guess the choice will depend on type of usage and budget.
Bob Denman
New member
Having owned 3 RTs: it simply comes down to picking the one that best suits your needs... :clap:
Having said that...
If I was buying another bike: it'd be the Ryker 600 twin.
Having said that...
If I was buying another bike: it'd be the Ryker 600 twin.
Having owned 3 RTs: it simply comes down to picking the one that best suits your needs... :clap:
Having said that...
If I was buying another bike: it'd be the Ryker 600 twin.
Interesting you say that as a previous RT owner... The 900 versions seem to be far more popular.
Bob Denman
New member
Needs can change...
Batmobil-F3
New member
I'm a fan of the F3. The Ryker is too petite for me, I am 1,90m (6 feet 3 inches) tall. The F3 has enough power, is sporty and I like the design. I also prefer the semi-automatic transmission, I don't want a CVT.
But I understand anyone who prefers a Ryker. It's a nice trike, ideal for gravel and curvy roads. So test both and decide then.
Both are excellent reverse trikes and make a lot of fun - enjoy your ride. :yes:
But I understand anyone who prefers a Ryker. It's a nice trike, ideal for gravel and curvy roads. So test both and decide then.
Both are excellent reverse trikes and make a lot of fun - enjoy your ride. :yes:
Gas mileage is not much different than the 1330. Maybe not quite as good but you only have to use regular gas which will give you a significant savings.
Similar threads
