• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

What happened??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Way2Fast
  • Start date Start date
I still think it's a crock!

Anybody 79 years old who grew up with the BOIL THE WATER on top of the stove coffee pots like she did as a young person then tries to say I did not think it could be this hot is way out there.

Also sqeezing it with your knees! :gaah:

Come on! Tell me a 79 year old has this amount of control holding a cup of coffee between her knees as to not crush it flat the minute the top is taken off! As a designer I can tell you much of these cups strength comes from the top being in place. To remove the lid while between your knees is insane! Why was the cup maker not sued for making cups you can crush between your knees!

Also the reflex to grab it tighter with your knees if the cup moves is almost a 100% way to assure you will crush the cup flat as the lid came off.

Yes she did get hurt, and yes it was sad. But to say a beverage that has been made forever by pouring BOILING WATER over ground coffee beans was served too hot! COME ON!

185 degrees does seem hot, that is until you put in 35 degree milk, then it goes way down. So I don't know about all the black coffee drinkers out there, but I still like my coffee hot after I put in the cream. Starting with really hot coffee is the only way I end up with hot coffee after the cream is put in.

Oh wait! What was I thinking, it's PC time! Nobody is responsiable for their own lack of judgement even after living on this planet for 79 years! IT MUST BE SOMEBODY ELSE'S FAULT!

I love you, you love me.........

MM
 
Last edited:
OK, talk about PC.

How about that avatar you got there? I didn't know you were a loud obnoxious Harley rider.:roflblack::roflblack::roflblack:

That was the best SP ever. :2thumbs:

Wouldn't even think of owning one after seeing that SP.:D

BROOMBROOMblablaBROOM!! :D

I made that sound while on the Spyder and someone called me a FAG! LOL
 
I still think it's a crock!

Anybody 79 years old who grew up with the BOIL THE WATER on top of the stove coffee pots like she did as a young person then tries to say I did not think it could be this hot is way out there.

Also sqeezing it with your knees! :gaah:

Come on! Tell me a 79 year old has this amount of control holding a cup of coffee between her knees as to not crush it flat the minute the top is taken off! As a designer I can tell you much of these cups strength comes from the top being in place. To remove the lid while between your knees is insane! Why was the cup maker not sued for making cups you can crush between your knees!

Also the reflex to grab it tighter with your knees if the cup moves is almost a 100% way to assure you will crush the cup flat as the lid came off.

Yes she did get hurt, and yes it was sad. But to say a beverage that has been made forever by pouring BOILING WATER over ground coffee beans was served too hot! COME ON!

185 degrees does seem hot, that is until you put in 35 degree milk, then it goes way down. So I don't know about all the black coffee drinkers out there, but I still like my coffee hot after I put in the cream. Starting with really hot coffee is the only way I end up with hot coffee after the cream is put in.

Oh wait! What was I thinking, it's PC time! Nobody is responsiable for their own lack of judgement even after living on this planet for 79 years! IT MUST BE SOMEBODY ELSE'S FAULT!

I love you, you love me.........

MM

I ll have to edit my previous post..you DO need meds!!
 
I still think it's a crock!

Anybody 79 years old who grew up with the BOIL THE WATER on top of the stove coffee pots like she did as a young person then tries to say I did not think it could be this hot is way out there.

Also sqeezing it with your knees! :gaah:

Come on! Tell me a 79 year old has this amount of control holding a cup of coffee between her knees as to not crush it flat the minute the top is taken off! As a designer I can tell you much of these cups strength comes from the top being in place. To remove the lid while between your knees is insane! Why was the cup maker not sued for making cups you can crush between your knees!

Also the reflex to grab it tighter with your knees if the cup moves is almost a 100% way to assure you will crush the cup flat as the lid came off.

Yes she did get hurt, and yes it was sad. But to say a beverage that has been made forever by pouring BOILING WATER over ground coffee beans was served too hot! COME ON!

185 degrees does seem hot, that is until you put in 35 degree milk, then it goes way down. So I don't know about all the black coffee drinkers out there, but I still like my coffee hot after I put in the cream. Starting with really hot coffee is the only way I end up with hot coffee after the cream is put in.

Oh wait! What was I thinking, it's PC time! Nobody is responsiable for their own lack of judgement even after living on this planet for 79 years! IT MUST BE SOMEBODY ELSE'S FAULT!

I love you, you love me.........

MM

Body heat= Raised the temp.:clap:
 
I still think it's a crock!

Anybody 79 years old who grew up with the BOIL THE WATER on top of the stove coffee pots like she did as a young person then tries to say I did not think it could be this hot is way out there.

Also sqeezing it with your knees! :gaah:

Come on! Tell me a 79 year old has this amount of control holding a cup of coffee between her knees as to not crush it flat the minute the top is taken off! As a designer I can tell you much of these cups strength comes from the top being in place. To remove the lid while between your knees is insane! Why was the cup maker not sued for making cups you can crush between your knees!

Also the reflex to grab it tighter with your knees if the cup moves is almost a 100% way to assure you will crush the cup flat as the lid came off.

Yes she did get hurt, and yes it was sad. But to say a beverage that has been made forever by pouring BOILING WATER over ground coffee beans was served too hot! COME ON!

185 degrees does seem hot, that is until you put in 35 degree milk, then it goes way down. So I don't know about all the black coffee drinkers out there, but I still like my coffee hot after I put in the cream. Starting with really hot coffee is the only way I end up with hot coffee after the cream is put in.

Oh wait! What was I thinking, it's PC time! Nobody is responsiable for their own lack of judgement even after living on this planet for 79 years! IT MUST BE SOMEBODY ELSE'S FAULT!

I love you, you love me.........

MM

:agree: with MM. Lack of own judgment bottom line, unless she was suffering from dimentia then she knew it was gonna be hot. I'm 45 yrs old and I would have thought twice to put a HOT beverage between my knees! Jeez! Why do you think our health care is out of control? From people like this - people who sue for tons of money, people who get hurt from STUPID decisions. Plus everyone is lawsuit happy in my book. Plenty of stupidity in this world - MORE THAN WE NEED.
 
I still think it's a crock!

Anybody 79 years old who grew up with the BOIL THE WATER on top of the stove coffee pots like she did as a young person then tries to say I did not think it could be this hot is way out there.

Also sqeezing it with your knees! :gaah:

Come on! Tell me a 79 year old has this amount of control holding a cup of coffee between her knees as to not crush it flat the minute the top is taken off! As a designer I can tell you much of these cups strength comes from the top being in place. To remove the lid while between your knees is insane! Why was the cup maker not sued for making cups you can crush between your knees!

Also the reflex to grab it tighter with your knees if the cup moves is almost a 100% way to assure you will crush the cup flat as the lid came off.

Yes she did get hurt, and yes it was sad. But to say a beverage that has been made forever by pouring BOILING WATER over ground coffee beans was served too hot! COME ON!

185 degrees does seem hot, that is until you put in 35 degree milk, then it goes way down. So I don't know about all the black coffee drinkers out there, but I still like my coffee hot after I put in the cream. Starting with really hot coffee is the only way I end up with hot coffee after the cream is put in.

Oh wait! What was I thinking, it's PC time! Nobody is responsiable for their own lack of judgement even after living on this planet for 79 years! IT MUST BE SOMEBODY ELSE'S FAULT!

I love you, you love me.........

MM

You know Evan, I might agree with except for this part of the document:

"During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700
claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims
involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. This
history documented McDonalds' knowledge about the extent and nature of
this hazard."

And this:

"Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company
actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185
degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn
hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above
,
and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured
into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn
the mouth and throat."

To me, regardless of what stupid thing this lady may or may not have done, McDonalds was knowingly negligent. And that is the main issue here.
 
You know Evan, I might agree with except for this part of the document:

"During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700
claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims
involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. This
history documented McDonalds' knowledge about the extent and nature of
this hazard."

And this:

"Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company
actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185
degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn
hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above,
and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured
into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn
the mouth and throat."

To me, regardless of what stupid thing this lady may or may not have done, McDonalds was knowingly negligent. And that is the main issue here.

Besides the fact that she initially wanted to settle for $20,000 and they turned her down...

One reason for the high temp was so that the coffee would still be hot by the time the customer got to the workplace but McD's research showed that most people wanted to drink their coffee immediately...

:dontknow:

And the $2 million + figure that is commonly thrown around while reporting this in the "ridiculous lawsuits" talk will never be paid as they settled for a lesser amount...
 
Last edited:
Hot coffee is SUPPOSED to be hot. Not warm. The woman knowingly purchased hot coffee and then proceeded to do something stupid.

STUPIDITY SHOULD BE PAINFUL
(not rewarded)

The pain should remind one not to repeat the same mistakes....

The negligent ones are the jurists that made a monetary award to a stupid person, rewarding her for her lack of self preservation, and consequently allowing every other idiot in this country to blame someone else for their own stupidity.....

Sorry to disagree Lou, but when you have over 700 complaints and your own quality assurance manager states "that a burn
hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above," You can have HOT coffee without it being dangerous. Their coffee was being served between 30-40 degrees over known hazard temps. If this had been a one time occurrence, then maybe, but 700 complaints is a lot. Also as bjt stated this lady was willing to settle for $20,000 to cover medical expenses which as you can see were extensive. I have seen third degree full thickness burns and people can go into shock and die from these burns. This lady didn't just have a little ouch.
 
All I know is I am so glad I haven't drank any Koolaid.

I don't believe anything anyone has to dole out about nothin in this country - it is totally OUT OF CONTROL
 
In that lawsuit article, substitute BRP for McDonalds, substitute known steering issues with known scalding temps of coffee, and substitute yourself or a loved one for the old lady and then decide how frivolous the lawsuit was. You can't rail on BRP on one hand and give McD's a free pass on the other.
 
At the time of the lawsuit, MD's sold about 1 BILLION cups of coffee annually. With 700 complaints in the previous 10 years. 700 out of 10 BILLION is not 'a lot'......Many of us preferred MD's coffee (before S'Bucks was nationwide) because it was hotter than the others.....I'm not arguing the severity of her injuries, only who's responsibility they ultimately are. If I put my hand on a hot stove, is it GE's fault??? I don't think so, I would have only myself to blame..... A hot cup of coffee is ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENT....

Selling a hot cup of coffee that is actually hot is not negligence........Lawsuits should be based on merit, as opposed to compassion.....

It's not a matter of compassion. You have a company that knowingly bucked the standard food service safety temps. "Other establishments sell
coffee at substantially lower temperatures, and coffee served at home is
generally 135 to 140 degrees."
 
Seems like a lot of substitution to be remotely similar.....
And I DID, and still would, call BRP out for some of their shenanigans.....I DIDN'T however, file any frivolous lawsuits against them.......It's not the same....


Well if McDonalds starts making a reverse trike with DPS, we could elminate some of the substitutions. :D
 
You know Evan, I might agree with except for this part of the document:

"During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700
claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims
involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. This
history documented McDonalds' knowledge about the extent and nature of
this hazard."

And this:

"Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company
actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185
degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn
hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above,
and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured
into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn
the mouth and throat."

To me, regardless of what stupid thing this lady may or may not have done, McDonalds was knowingly negligent. And that is the main issue here.


No way! You make coffee by pouring BOILING WATER OVER COFFEE BEANS it will be very hot.

Because out of the MILLIONS OF CUPS OF COFFEE McDonalds serves each and every day there were 700 IDIOTS OUT THERE over all the years is no surprise.

All I can say is with anything given millions and millions of people one thing is for sure.....

You will be able to find 700 idiots no problem.

Whats next?

I burned my mouth because the cheese on my pizza that's cooked in a 450 degree oven was too hot too.

These people were, and are idiots!

Its time to thin the heard!

At least in nature the stupid animals get eaten so they don't live long enough to reproduce. Nature's not mean or evil, it's just the way God made it all work out. Too bad it's not the same here.

MM
 
In that lawsuit article, substitute BRP for McDonalds, substitute known steering issues with known scalding temps of coffee, and substitute yourself or a loved one for the old lady and then decide how frivolous the lawsuit was. You can't rail on BRP on one hand and give McD's a free pass on the other.

Sorry but I disagree. When you buy coffee, you know you are buying a hot beverage. When you buy a Spyder, you know you are buying a machine which could be dangerous. just like any other bike or automobile depending how it's ridden/driven. But steering is different - you buy a spyder knowing it's gotta steer and not go out of control for no reason. You buy coffee, knowing it is hot and you have control about how you handle the beverage - like being in a car with the cup between your knees is just asking for trouble. It's totally different than substituting BRP.
 
Sorry but I disagree. When you buy coffee, you know you are buying a hot beverage. When you buy a Spyder, you know you are buying a machine which could be dangerous. just like any other bike or automobile depending how it's ridden/driven. But steering is different - you buy a spyder knowing it's gotta steer and not go out of control for no reason. You buy coffee, knowing it is hot and you have control about how you handle the beverage - like being in a car with the cup between your knees is just asking for trouble. It's totally different than substituting BRP.


True but getting a sore lap and a little redness is different than getting third degree burns requiring skin grafts.

I'll quit now as I told Deb I'd quit dragging this thread on... :D
 
True but getting a sore lap and a little redness is different than getting third degree burns requiring skin grafts.

I'll quit now as I told Deb I'd quit dragging this thread on... :D

Nah, don't quit! It's actually pretty cool to see all the different opinions people have on stuff. We should get a "debate" folder with a differet topic of the week that we could talk about!:thumbup:

Many times I've burnt my mouth on Starbucks coffee - where I've gotten a blister. I can't even carry a cup outta the store unless I have one of those cardboard thingies wrapped around it. But I didn't sue them. I feel bad for the old lady but it really lacks common sense putting something between your knees that you know is hot and could possibly spill on you. I've only had Mickey D's coffee a couple of times but I'll tell you - that Starbucks is HOT!
 
Nah, don't quit! It's actually pretty cool to see all the different opinions people have on stuff. We should get a "debate" folder with a differet topic of the week that we could talk about!:thumbup:

Many times I've burnt my mouth on Starbucks coffee - where I've gotten a blister. I can't even carry a cup outta the store unless I have one of those cardboard thingies wrapped around it. But I didn't sue them. I feel bad for the old lady but it really lacks common sense putting something between your knees that you know is hot and could possibly spill on you. I've only had Mickey D's coffee a couple of times but I'll tell you - that Starbucks is HOT!

Problem is, debating can turn into name calling / bashing / hurt feelings. That's why most forums ban political posts. It quickly turns from debates to flaming.

Still going to let this one lie for the time being. :D
 
Back
Top