Unless it's
REALLY excessive (ie, throw you off the saddle type 'really excessive, not just a 'worrying noise' type excessive!

) then that 'first shift' noise & clunk that rocks your Spyder after any start up is pretty much par for the course - especially the first one for the day when everything including the oil is cold! :lecturef_smilie:
The engine & transmission do share oil, and the gears/gearbox/clutch all work on a 'constant mesh' basis when running, generally making for quicker & smoother shifts; but it also means that for the first shift after engine start up,
especially when the oil & all the internal components are cold, you are actually spinning up the gearbox internals from a dead stop, and because a bunch of the components that would 'normally' be spinning aren't yet, that takes some effort & produces a fairly obvious 'physically felt' clunk and quite a loud noise too! :shocked: But from there on in, once everything including the oil is all warmed up properly, unless you put it in neutral & idle it for quite a while, everything is turning already and so it is easier/smoother to engage. It's the nature of the design, and it effectively happens on
ALL similarly designed engine/gearbox machines, only some are lighter/quieter than others - which is not
necessarily such a 'good' thing?! But it does mean that you are most likely worrying needlesly! :thumbup:
There's quite a bit of historical discussion on this 'clunk' &/or 'noise on first shift' if you want to check it out further. I don't
think anyone has yet found it to be an 'actual problem', even tho some (few) have not taken the proferred advice to heart and have continued searching for other faults to explain it for quite some time & extent.... but it
is a feature of the design & generally
isn't anything to worry about! Over to you! :cheers:
Edit: Sorry that I've (apparently) repeated what others have already posted, but my reply above was the
first & only reply in the
second thread asking the very same question from Neal, so it was more appropriate to explain fully what was going on there. But now both threads have been merged (cos there's rarely any point in duplicating threads & diluting the response.

) it may
seem that my reply is labouring those points already covered by JayB & BK911 in a way that was never intended.

pps: