• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

1330 OIL REPORT

:shocked: I think you lost me again...
(Not really all that tough of a thing to do! :opps:)

DO YOU THINK...
...That the BRP Blended version; is a good-enough oil to last for the 9300 miles? :dontknow:
 
I am willing to listen, seriously, I am.

Could Rotella T6 be too good? Possibly.

Maybe BRP should specify a designated rating that clarifies the owners manual. As is, they stipulate a motorcycle oil and a rating that is reflecting a minimum or higher.

As mentioned, maybe it is too good. Should it meet JASO MA2, not according to BRP.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_Rotella_T

Motorcycle usage


Though marketed as an engine oil for diesel trucks, Rotella oil has found popularity with motorcyclists as well. The lack of "friction modifiers" in Rotella means they do not interfere with wet clutch operations. (This is called a "shared sump" design, which is unlike automobiles which maintain separate oil reservoirs - one for the engine and one for the transmission). Used oil analysis (UOA) reports on BobIsTheOilGuy.com have shown wear metals levels comparable to oils marketed as motorcycle-specific.
JASO-MA

JASO is an acronym that stands for "The Japanese Automotive Standards Organization." Among other things, they set standards for oil to be used in motorcycles.
Shell Rotella T 15W-40 conventional oil does list on its packaging JASO MA as one of the specifications it meets. Note that the 10W-30 conventional oil does not list JASO-MA.
The newer fully synthetic T6 5W-40 oil lists JASO-MA compliance on its packaging and on the Rotella website.


I said I am willing to listen, the internet has many posts about T6 being used in machines will mileage on them and some have had clutch slippage. There is also a large following of people using T6 with no issues.

An auto clutch can be a difficult item. When we raced Karts, wet clutches were common. While not the exact same, these were smaller in size, but similar in effect. The settings were adjusted to create slip to a given point of torque.


This is a copy and paste from the 2013 RT owners manual

EngineOil
Recommended Engine Oil
The same oil is used for the engine,
gearbox, clutch, and the Hydraulic Control
Module (HCM) on the SE5 model.
Use the XPS 4-STROKE SYNTH.
BLEND OIL (SUMMER) (P/N 293 600
121) or a 5W40 semi-synthetic (minimum)
or synthetic motorcycle oil
meeting the requirements for API service
SL, SJ, SH or SG classification.
Always check the API service label on
the oil container.
NOTICE To avoid damaging the
clutch, do not use a motor oil meeting
theAPI serviceSMor ILSACGF-4
classification. Clutch slippage will
occur.
NOTICE Do not add any oil additives
to the recommended oil. This
may lead to gearbox and clutchmalfunctions.


This is a copy and paste from the current Shell information spec sheet.

SAE Viscosity Grade: 5W-40
API CJ-4, CI-4 PLUS, CI-4, CH-4, SM, SL, SH; ACEA E9; Caterpillar
ECF-3, ECF-2; Cummins CES 20081; DDC 93K218; Ford WSS
M2C171-E; JASO DH-2, MA; Mack EO-O Premium Plus; MB Approval
228.31; Volvo VDS-4


According to current published info, the T6 should not be used in the 2013 Spyder.

Possibly Shell had not submitted the oil for new testing when you ran it. Maybe it is just too good for a motorcycle wet clutch, but it seems odd it meets the specs for a wet clutch.

Really, I am listening. Explain some more beyond the clutch slipped and stopped slipping after the oil was "flushed" out. By the sound of it, T6 is too good and an oil that can hold the clutch is less of an oil.

FWIW, I did some looking at BITOG older posts from 2010 and back then T6 was rated as an SM. Not sure what to say, could there have been some bad info and you used an SM oil in a machine specifically not approved for it. I don't know and not accussing, simply asking. Again I am willing to listen.

PK

That is exactly what I did I put an SM rated oil in my 09 that was strictly forbidden by my owner’s manual. That was wrong on my part and regret doing it.

Today on another thread folks again are recommending someone else put Rottela T6 in a 998 engine. Even when the OP said had a better choice available. Again their reason was that it had a JASO MA test result, even though BRP does not specify a JASO rating and completely ignoring the fact that it is API rated SM. Since MA has something to do with motorcycle wet clutch slippage, which must be good and ignore what that means as well. JASO MA does not mean it passed anything; it is a classification based on 3 performance test results. That was what was happening in 2011 as well. Not knowing any better at the time I used it, with the results I stated. Since then I have been doing a lot of reading and have learn a lot about oil. More than I ever want to know in fact. I have read several versions of the actual JASO wet clutch slippage test spec. Sorry off hand I don't remember the spec number. The original spec had 2 possible results for wet clutch slippage MB or MA. In the preamble to a later spec revision it was noted that the MA spec was way too broad for several motorcycle manufacturers and were having clutch slippage issues with oil rated MA. Thus it was revised to 4 possible outcomes, MB, MA, MA1, and MA2. At no point in the spec does it say that any one of these out comes is better than the other. It is up to the manufacturer to specify what is required. Since BRP does not specify a JASO specification to meet I am wary when anyone says that MA is good enough. Why not MA1, maybe MA2 or MB.

I think that anyone using non motorcycle, API SM rated oil in a 998 engine is in violation of the requirements in the owner’s manual. You have the right to do whatever you please. You should own up to whatever the outcome is as well. If you recommend this to someone else you need to warn them that you are in violation of the requirement in the owners manual.

Since this a 1330 thread and not a 998 thread, the API SM rating does not apply. What does apply is that Rottela T6 is not motorcycle oil. It is diesel engine oil, as clearly stated on the front label. Having the JASO test result of MA is meaningless since BRP does not specify a requirement. Because Wikipedia says many people are using it in other motorcycles is also meaningless. The only thing that matters is if you use it in a 1330 engine will it give you 10s of thousands of good performance over multiple oil changes. It may just do that. I don’t know. Anyone claiming that they do, well I won’t say it. We need a couple guinea pigs to try it out. Also live with the result if it does not work out and not blame BRP.

My point in bringing this up in the first place is educational. There could be maybe a down side to Rottela T6. I hate a group think love in. Just because someone or a group says this is good to use may not be accurate. They may not know or understand the facts either. Make your choices based on what you think is best and if you are wrong oh well, fix it and move on and don’t blame someone else. It is also possible this is the best possible oil you could use in your 1330. It just does not meet the requirements of being motorcycle oil.
 
:shocked: I think you lost me again...
(Not really all that tough of a thing to do! :opps:)

DO YOU THINK...
...That the BRP Blended version; is a good-enough oil to last for the 9300 miles? :dontknow:

There are some that believe that it is not. It is always possible that they are correct. The most important opinion is BRP's and they claim it is. It is possible that they are wrong. :shocked:
 
:shocked: I think you lost me again...
(Not really all that tough of a thing to do! :opps:)

DO YOU THINK...
...That the BRP Blended version; is a good-enough oil to last for the 9300 miles? :dontknow:

In a nut shell, yes. IMHO BRP says so. If you have an engine related, or clutch related problem. And they ask, "what oil did you use"? You kept the receipts, yes? You are covered, if you used their oil. Beyond any doubt. I used your dealer, your oil, your filter. You said I could go 9300 miles, or one year on the same oil. End of story, fix the damn thing. If you do your own oil changes, make sure you keep good records. Friend of mine riding a Victory had an engine related problem. First question asked, "who changed the oil"? He did. Next, "do you have receipts". He had to produce the receipts for the oil and filters. All manufacturers are looking for ways to not approve warranty work. Don't give it to them. :thumbup: Tom :trike:
 
I have read and re read your post.

OK, so the wrong oil was used and predicted results occurred. No big deal for you anymore. This is behind us.

Yes, this is a 1330 based topic, so even the SM rated oils are allowed.

I have one question at this point. Not arguing or being a smart ass. If we took the motorcycle badging off a bottle of Mobil 1 10w40 moto oil, it too is rated JASO MA what would distinguish it to be a moto oil? I am seeing it is CF rated which should be a diesel rating.

Copied from a Mobil 1 moto spec sheet[TABLE="class: pdstable"]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR="class: pdstableAlt"]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
box_LeftUpper.png
Mobil 1 Racing 4T 10W-40 motorcycle oil meets or exceeds the requirements of:
API SM
API SL
API SJ
JASO MA

According to ExxonMobil, Mobil 1 Racing 4T 10W-40 is of the following quality level:
API SH
API CF


PK

I have said in the past in many posts that Mobile 1 10w 30 motorcycle oil does not meets the requirements of BRP for 998 engines because it is rated API SM.
It does appear to meet the requirements of BRP for the 1330 engine.
In regards to the JASO MA rating. I know BRP does not specify, but it is rare for a motorcycle oil to only meet JASO MA rating, most meet a MA2 rating. My personal choice if I had a 1330 engine would be not to use Mobile 1 because of the MA rating and go for an oil with a JASO rating of MA2. Because of the unknowns here, reality could be that MA is good enough.
 
Ivan2

Thanks for this report! :thumbup:
Question: Would you suggest using BRP's full synthetic, as opposed to their blend? :dontknow:
(I'm getting REAL close to the 3,000 mile tap-dance... I'd like to be sure of what to ask for! :D)

I recently performed the 9000 mile service on my 2014 and requested the BRP full synthetic oil. I was told by the dealer that BRP no longer recommends the full synthetic because it is causing clutch problems.
 
I recently performed the 9000 mile service on my 2014 and requested the BRP full synthetic oil. I was told by the dealer that BRP no longer recommends the full synthetic because it is causing clutch problems.

It was more likely that your dealer did not have the synthetic in stock and made up a story to tell you to go away. There is no service bulletin to this effect and the BRP synthetic is still for sale on the BRP web site and else where.
 
FWIW

Below is an URL for JASO specifications and a list of motorcycle oils that are actually certified by Jaso. It's dated 8/1/2014, so it appears current. When the page opens, go to the left column and about 2/3's down you will see...(JASO Onfile)...click on that and then on the next screen click on "ENGLISH" and in the next screen click on the "Motorcycle Four Cycle Gasoline Engine Oil" and you will be at the main info screen. Specs for MA, MA2, are in there.

http://www.jalos.or.jp/
 
It was more likely that your dealer did not have the synthetic in stock and made up a story to tell you to go away. There is no service bulletin to this effect and the BRP synthetic is still for sale on the BRP web site and else where.

My dealer told me the same thing. Full synthetic not recommended for the 1330. :ohyea: That makes two dealers. :yikes: Tom :trike:
 
My dealer told me the same thing. Full synthetic not recommended for the 1330. :ohyea: That makes two dealers. :yikes: Tom :trike:

I say BALONEY! I think they are confusing "not necessary" with "not recommended". Big, big difference. :sour:
 
Whats wrong with just using BRP oil? All the experts on the forum can't seem to agree on what to use? I personally just use the BRP full synthetic on my 2014. I see no issues, and it's a BRP product, so if anything happens, its their problem.
 
The Shell Rotella T6 is JASO MA2 rated, not just MA

http://www.epc.shell.com/Docs/GPCDO...Shell_Rotella_T6_5W-40_(CJ-4)_(en-US)_TDS.pdf

It is also API SM which for the moment appears to negate its use in the 998 but not the 1330. The M1 motorcycle oils are also SM rated. So far the only major brand I have found to meet the requirements for the 998 that is available off the shelf is the Valvoline Motorcycle full synthetic.

Castrol Power RS™ Racing 4T is a full synthetic rated API SL and JASO MA2. It is available off the shelf in 10W-40 http://msdspds.castrol.com/bpglis/FusionPDS.nsf/Files/7305E463374A5C1E80257AA9005372F2/$File/Castrol_Power_RS_4T_06410.pdf
 
I have gone through the 3000 mile and two 9300 s using BRP Oem oil and it has run great and not used a drop of oil
 
BRP Oil Analysis

I am home now and have the Napa kit ($15) in hand. Should have some good info on the BRP oil out of my RT by mid-week next week. That oil has almost 4,000 miles on it. Interested to see what the shearing has dropped to. Will also have them check for contaminants including any metals. I'll post the results when I get it.
 
To clarify - I ran BRP oil and had that tested at 6000 miles (9000 on the Spyder). The first service was done by the dealer then at 9000 miles I changed the oil switching over to Mobil 1 motorcycle oil as I have been using Mobil synthatic oil in all my motorcycles for many years with great results.

Hello, is Mobil 1 10W40 a good choice for the 998 motor? I just bought a 2013 Spyder RT Limited, and would like to know what oil to buy to have on hand. The dealer will be doing the regular maintenance, but I know it's good to have oil on hand.
 
My dealer told me the same thing. Full synthetic not recommended for the 1330. :ohyea: That makes two dealers. :yikes: Tom :trike:

Why would a dealer NOT recommend a BETTER product? The only reason I can think of is if the viscosity is wrong.

Dealers USED to say Iridium Spark Plugs were BAD and did not work well in the Rotax motor. Now, guess what comes stock...

When reality and dealers part ways... Stick with reality! :thumbup:
 
Back
Top