******** was before my time, (But I recall hearing the tales of his... unusual behavior! :shocked
CuznJohn was nowhere near the problem of the other guy! nojoke
In fact: I never thought of him as being a problem at all.
I stopped complaining a long time ago. I just read the heading to see if it might interest me or not. If not I go to the next one
:agree: But, believe me, the ones who like to use the subject line as an ambiguous 'teaser' headline won't change.nojokeThat's the whole point of this post. If people would put the true subject in the heading you could skip the ones of no interest to you.
People post I need help? Put my 2011 RTS is ( subject here). Not hard to do. If I have a 2011 will open and try to help. If you just put I need help I am going to skip by you.
I stopped complaining a long time ago.
There was a day when the subject line really did matter. Remember your super fast 9600 baud (that was after years of 1200 and 2400 baud!) dial up modem and Compuserve and off line readers? The smart way to read what was on the bulletin board was to sign in, download the list of subject lines from the forum of interest, and then disconnect. Then you'd go down through the list and mark the ones you wanted to look at, dial in and sign in again, download the posts you had marked, and disconnect. You'd read the posts at your leisure without incurring phone charges, write up your responses, dial in and sign in again, and upload your posts. Back then, in the early nineties, time really did equal money. Today with our 100 to 1000 mb/second internet connections and flat monthly rates, the impact of misleading subject lines is mostly a little bit of misspent time and aggravation. Let's keep things in perspective. Life is good! :thumbup:If people would put the true subject in the heading you could skip the ones of no interest to you.
People post I need help? Put my 2011 RTS is ( subject here). Not hard to do. If I have a 2011 will open and try to help. If you just put I need help I am going to skip by you.
Why is it that people both "Thank for this Post" and "Like this Post"? Isn't that redundant?
Why is it that people both "Thank for this Post" and "Like this Post"? Isn't that redundant?
Why not choose the one that best expresses your sentiment, and stick with it! :2thumbs:
Merry Christmas! :yes: (And NO, I did not start another separate thread just to say that!)
(Uh-Oh... I guess I better go hide now.pps: )
Having the two different choices actually makes lots of sense.
You can like a post, you can be thankful for a post, or you can be both... or neither
So, if you are thankful for a post, you don't necessarily like it?:hun:
What if someone is reporting an illness in their family... or worse? :dontknow:
You CAN be thankful for unpleasant news; even if you're not fond of the message.
Why is it that people both "Thank for this Post" and "Like this Post"? Isn't that redundant? Why not choose the one that best expresses your sentiment, and stick with it! :2thumbs:
SO DID I!akspyderman, I see what you did there. :roflblack:
Good thinking! And to click on BOTH would not be just redundant, but contradictory, right?I think of 'Like' as an expression of affirmation.
I think of 'thank' as 'don't necessarily agree but I thank you for speaking up or for putting the effort into it'