BajaRon
Well-known member
Irrelevant was probably a poor choice of words.
The point I was attempting to make was that had this been an isolated incident, i.e. no other Spyders had spontaneously combusted, then looking for an external cause would be far more relevant. The fact that other spyders have caught fire should focus the investigation around looking for a common cause.
How many years did Ford deny anything systemic withing their trucks that could cause them to catch fire while sitting in a driveway hours after being parked only to find a defective cruise control switch was the culprit?
Personally, I think you have to rule out any common element before you start looking at additional causal factors. Perhaps it will turn out that the common issue is load on the accessory circuit? Who knows?
I just find it highly unlikely that these fires (3 or 4 that I'm aware of) aren't the result of the same defect.
IMHO what was plugged into the accessory socket is not relevant until all common factors are eliminated. You certainly have the right to disagree.
The real truth is we are all working in the dark here. Nobody knows much of anything and we are all speculating (including me).
It has been mentioned, and it is sadly true, that with this much fire damage it may well be there can be no definite cause determined. Fire investigation is an art mixed with science, experience and a good eye for evidence.
Some are better at it than others. Even so there are many times where even an expert just can't say.
The thing to avoid here are "Conclusions", all of which have a high probablity of error and get us no closer to a solution.