W
Way2Fast
Guest
I had posts disappear before...no telling how things get lost in cyber space ??
I had posts disappear before...no telling how things get lost in cyber space ??
Yeah-- I would doubt it too--- just using that as an example since this fire was so strange compare to the others. Maybe something else electrical up front - something with the fuse box, etc..... I mean that trunk was melted right off the bike--- had to have started nearby I would think.
Would be interesting to see day-time photos and closeups.
I am also wondering if the laptop, or cellphone, was plugged into a 12 volt outlet in the trunk at the time. We just had a lady at work who left her IPhone charger plugged into the power outlet in her Suburban. It actually started a fire that destroyed the entire center of the dashboard and burned out the headliner while smoking the windshield.
I am glad the rider is okay, and am not trying to fuel the flames so to speak. Just saying that some items we plug into our power outlets could be faulty as well.
Irrelevant, riders and drivers log millions of miles annually with cell phones, mp3 players and laptops connected to 12V sources and we don't hear about other bikes and cars going up in flames because of it.
That is an amazing statement. I spent 33 years in the fire service with my share of investigations and reports running the gambit from defective manufacture to arson and everything in-between.
Thousands of Spyder owners have traveled millions of collective miles and never had their ride burst into flames. Does that make this case "Irrelevant"?
I don't have any idea what caused this fire and I'm not saying I can determine much from the little information we have. But to say an electronic device plugged into a power source in the very location where it appears the fire originated is "Irrelevant" is nearly as interesting as the fire itself.
We don't know if anything was plugged in or not. But in my experience, nothing is irrelevant if you want to get to the bottom of an unexplained fire.
That is an amazing statement. I spent 33 years in the fire service with my share of investigations and reports running the gambit from defective manufacture to arson and everything in-between.
Thousands of Spyder owners have traveled millions of collective miles and never had their ride burst into flames. Does that make this case "Irrelevant"?
I don't have any idea what caused this fire and I'm not saying I can determine much from the little information we have. But to say an electronic device plugged into a power source in the very location where it appears the fire originated is "Irrelevant" is nearly as interesting as the fire itself.
We don't know if anything was plugged in or not. But in my experience, nothing is irrelevant if you want to get to the bottom of an unexplained fire.
That is an amazing statement. I spent 33 years in the fire service with my share of investigations and reports running the gambit from defective manufacture to arson and everything in-between.
Thousands of Spyder owners have traveled millions of collective miles and never had their ride burst into flames. Does that make this case "Irrelevant"?
I don't have any idea what caused this fire and I'm not saying I can determine much from the little information we have. But to say an electronic device plugged into a power source in the very location where it appears the fire originated is "Irrelevant" is nearly as interesting as the fire itself.
We don't know if anything was plugged in or not. But in my experience, nothing is irrelevant if you want to get to the bottom of an unexplained fire.
I would not jump to the conclusion that the fire started in the front compartment because the compartment was totally destroyed. My saddlebags were totally destroyed. Does this mean the fire started there. I know where my fire started and it wasn't in the saddlebags, or the front compartment which was also totally destroyed. The tupperware goes up fast. My burn pattern clearly indicated the fire started on the right side. Mr. K's burn pattern is not conclusive from what I can see on the pictures. We would need pictures from more different angles. With a little longer burn time Mr. K's Spyder would have been totally destroyed. This would give us a different perspective. Take a look at the engine compartment. There is serious damage there. This is more significant than the fact that the front compartment was totally destroyed.
Mr K knows where the fire was first noticeable. If it turns out to be the front compartment, I will take back everything I said above and I will apologize.
Who said his Spyder was equipped with an accessory socket?IMHO what was plugged into the accessory socket is not relevant until all common factors are eliminated.
I don't think post #25 is bunk.It's all bunk...and speculation...
I don't think post #25 is bunk.