• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Worth it to upgrade 2012 RTL?

I have owned a 2012 RTS-SE5( my first spyder) It had the 998 engine, I only had it for 2 years.

I took a test ride on a 2014 RTS-SE6 ( which is my current spyder). Why I bought a 2014 RTS-SE6 was the comfort,and the low maintenance, and the bigger engine, ( 1330 Ace Engine) qutier engine, and all the major upgrades they did. It has a 1200 Watt Alternator. I have about 29,000 miles on my current spyder.

Deanna
 
2012 " V-twin " .... BRP stopped using this engine in 2016 (?) .... so how many years from now do you think Parts will still be available. ???? .... Mike :thumbup:

I would think parts for the engine would be available for a few more years, and I hope I don't need any. :D
With 4,000 miles, I hope the engine lasts for quite a few more years.
And the more I ride it the more I like it.
 
I've owned a 2010, 2014 and now a 2020.
If you can hold out, I'd suggest getting a 2020 in a few years when the used prices will be lower.
The 1330 engine upgrade in 2014 was a major generational upgrade.
In 2020, the suspension, comfort and storage upgrades are another major generational upgrade still.

As always, my free advice comes with a double your money back guarantee.

I've owned the same three years, and completely agree with you. My 2010 had issues, but as I understand it the 2012 was significantly improved. Still, the biggest upgrade was the 2014 and I wouldn't every buy anything earlier than that at this point in time - and if one can afford a 2020+ I'm a fan of the smaller changes and the new body design. Just skip the BRP connect features, and the dash isn't an issue.
 
I would think parts for the engine would be available for a few more years, and I hope I don't need any. :D
With 4,000 miles, I hope the engine lasts for quite a few more years.
And the more I ride it the more I like it.

I've got customers with well over 100k on the original engine and clutch. If you take care of them, they will last a very long time. I don't mean baby them. I mean regular maintenance. I think they actually last longer if you ride them a bit hard. Wring them out once in a while.
 
I've got customers with well over 100k on the original engine and clutch. If you take care of them, they will last a very long time. I don't mean baby them. I mean regular maintenance. I think they actually last longer if you ride them a bit hard. Wring them out once in a while.

Yeah, I hafta agree with that bit! :thumbup: . I've seen more 'ridden soo carefully & never revved hard or run fast' Spyders with (wear? or mis-use?? :dontknow: ) problems than I have in those Spyders that've been ridden hard & run out to the red line fairly often, but also maintained well & regularly! ;)

It seems that these Rotax V-twins really need to work - as if it's in their DNA or something... :ohyea: Back a few years now (8-10 or so?) I recall some people with V-twin SE's having clutch/trans issues because they didn't often rev them hard enough to properly engage the clutch; and also seeing some appalling looking oil coming out of Spyders that the owners claimed had always been serviced as scheduled but never treated hard or revved beyond about 5k!! :shocked: . I reckon they just never worked the engine properly/got the oil hot enough to burn out all the combustible crud; and I don't ever recall seeing oil like that coming out of Spyders that'd been run to the red line often!! :sour: . Maybe that was because those riding harder knew their V-twin engines used a little oil between scheduled changes so they kept an eye on it & topped it up with fresh oil more often; but for whatever reason, it really seems that it's the Spyders that've been worked a bit & regularly see high revs are those that are racking up the big & largely trouble free miles on the odometer... :dontknow:

And the other thing to remember about these Rotax V-twins & parts availability is that Spyders aren't the ONLY place/platforms they're used in! There's a reasonably wide range of machines that run the same or very similar V-twin Rotax engines and even a few that run similar transmissions & clutches, and it's not as if all of those are going to suddenly drop out of use just cos Rotax no longer puts the V-twin motor in Spyders :shocked: So I reckon most common maintenance parts will be available for a good while yet, and because some of the major components are effectively 'scheduled replacement parts' on some of the platforms these engines run in, they too will be available for a good while yet... possibly not always as OE gear, but in that case, then very likely as a/mkt parts! :thumbup:

Besides, I've yet to ride a 1330 engined Spyder that is as exciting & exhilarating as my V-twin engined RT, and then there's the rattly engine, the run-away sewing machine sound output, and the useless (to me, anyway ;) ) digital dash with pointless add-ons & OTT technical innovations that really do nothing for the ride experience I'm after & just increase the number of things with a significant potential for failure, or things that are just another example of a great concept that suffers from pretty poor execution! So I'm still sticking with my fun to ride, high revving V-twin engined Spyder, at least for the forsee-able future.... :ohyea:
 
Back
Top