:agree:
I did purchase the BEST warranty when I bought the spyder simply because I knew it was new and unproven and I was scared not to. /QUOTE]
How smart you were to have done so! :2thumbs: :clap:
But.....
How sad it is anyone needs to be "scared" about buying a product because it was as you say "new and unproven" and there is no confidance that the company will stand behind any real manufacturing short comings that will show up as time goes on. That is now what these DPS failures are showing themselves to be.
If everytime there was a new product made you as the consumer needed to buy an extended warranty on it because it could have manufacturing shortcomings that would leave you on your own, how much would that stink!
As the Spyder was brand new to the world, all of the products my company made for the Spyder were "new and unproven items" too. But we would never ask the end user to hold the bag if something we manufactured had an obvious design or manufacturing defect. It's just not`good business to do so. Not to mention, just not right ether.
...and that's on $100 parts, not $17,000 machines ether.
I agree 100% that anything mechanical can break at anytime. :agree:
However, these DPS problems are not in that category in any way, shape or form.
The way it is now the just telling everybody "the let them eat cake mentality" of just spend $1000 on and extended warranty to cover this is not a real, nor fair solution, or even an option for many people.
Let's not confuse this post about general long term breakdown coverage for the random failure, and specific DPS failures.
I was asking about coverage for what is now appearing to be a shortcoming in the design or manufature of a major safety system of the Spyder.
To all of you that ether bought an extended warranty or can still afford one now, hats off. :clap:
But IMHO, truth is you should not have had to do so to get piece of mind regarding future DPS failures.
Engines, trans or other random faliures maybe, but not for DPS problems.
MM