• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

statins and cholesterol and NRT

wyliec

New member
For those that are on statins and haven't had any side effects, you probably aren't interested in Nutritional Response Testing (NRT). I was on statins for over 15 years and had a few side effects and decided to get off the drug and informed my primary care physician; he was on board with it. After 5 months starting with NRT (with a certified nutritionist) I feel much better. I recently had blood work done at my primary care and although my 'total' and 'bad cholesterol' have gone up (as expected), the other cholesterol readings are fine. My doctor then checked my inflammation level with blood work and that test came back fine.

This post is not meant to tell someone that statins are bad or that NRT works for everyone. It's just an option to look in to. If interested, just google 'nutrition response testing.'

One more thing, NRT is for way more then why I originally went to see the nutritionist.

Now if I could just find something to grow hair.:joke:
 
Last edited:
Wylie,
Glad to hear that you found an option that is working well for you! :thumbup:
What is this NRT? Is it a dietary deal? Supplements?
 
For those that are on statins and haven't had any side effects, you probably aren't interested in Nutritional Response Testing (NRT). I was on statins for over 15 years and had a few side effects and decided to get off the drug and informed my primary care physician; he was on board with it. After 5 months starting with NRT (with a certified nutritionist) I feel much better. I recently had blood work done at my primary care and although my 'total' and 'bad cholesterol' have gone up (as expected), the other cholesterol readings are fine. My doctor then checked my inflammation level with blood work and that test came back fine.

This post is not meant to tell someone that statins are bad or that NRT works for everyone. It's just an option to look in to. If interested, just google 'nutrition response testing.'

One more thing, NRT is for way more then why I originally went to see the nutritionist.

Now if I could just find something to grow hair.:joke:

I never take drugs until I exhaust natural remedies. went from 237 down to 189 eating nuts cinnamon, and watching my diet. Got rid of Acid Reflux instead of taking the purple pills.

There is a Chinese herb that will help grow hair back and also get hair color back. Forget exactly what it is, something like 'he shou wo' will try to google it later.
 
Wylie,
Glad to hear that you found an option that is working well for you! :thumbup:
What is this NRT? Is it a dietary deal? Supplements?

It's both dietary and supplements.

The means to determine what you may have food sensitivities to may seem like hocu pocus to some.
 
I only seem sensitive to NOT having food...
36_11_1.gif
That's why I was able beat anexoria! :2thumbs: (Kicked it's butt, actually!)
 

This is a Great Simple explanation of the Ever Important cholesterol ratio for those needing more info!
 
After my gallbladder was removed 3 weeks ago, I now avoid salted food, fried food and fatty foods. I eat more fruit, veggies, selected nuts,flux seeds. For growing hair:dontknow::dontknow::dontknow: but for now join the club "bold is beautiful":yes::yes::yes:
 

This is a Great Simple explanation of the Ever Important cholesterol ratio for those needing more info!

I have a 4:1 ratio. If you listen to that slide presentation it also mentions inflammation. I had a separate blood test done for inflammation and the results were near the bottom of the scale, the lesser end of inflammation. The ratio and the inflammation should correlate and in my case they don't. So, is the ratio a better way to go or is the inflammation more accurate?

I've read where the various cholesterol numbers were determined by the pharmaceutical companies that sell statins.:dontknow:
 
Of course! They sell the chemicals, so they want to make sure that whatever limit that's in the body will jive with what they want their sales forecast to like the most! :gaah:
 
Back
Top