Yes, and in the RT manual it was 750 Newtons. The original GS manual was 1500. They seem to have been revising it steadily downward.By the way PRIOR to the service bulletin, the Technical Update manual listed the following Newtons as the proper belt tension:
Adjust the belt tension with the suspension completly unloaded to 900 +/- 75 Newtons (70 degrees F).
Recheck the belt tension with the vehicle on the ground and verify that the belt tension is 1150 +/- 100 Newtons (70 degrees F).
Scotty,
Thank you for your reply. I plan on lifting the wheel to get the readings, and doing it in at least 2 or 3 places, so we're good there.
I understand when you say that it's not a direct correlation between the two types of gauges being used, but I figure that if I get pretty close to 101 lbs. or so, I should be well within the ballpark. Hopefully we can get a better reference point when more people have their tension checked and calibrated at the dealers.
Thanks again,
Skidz
I'm curios as to whether they used the new spec to adjust Lamont's belt, or the old one for the RT, which was 750 Newtons + or -. That would equate to 160 pounds, so 180 would have been within the old spec.Just my 2 cents but I would not adjust your belt to 101 lbs. by the Krikit. While 101 lbs. would be correct conversion from Newtons, we do not know yet what corrilation there is between the gauge used by dealers specifically made to measure tension in our belt and the reading we will get from the Krikit for the same tension.
In other words, just because the Krikit says you have 101 lbs. of tension does not mean you are in spec.
We really need to do what Scotty says. Get a properly adjusted belt and then test it with the Krikit and see what it reads. Lamont said his Krikit read 180 lbs. after having his RT adjusted to the new spec. Either his Krikit was reading high or the tech set his belt tighter than current spec.
It really does not matter if the lbs. on the Krikit corrilate exatly to Newtons. What matters is the reading that a properly adjusted belt will give on the Krikit.
Once we get a consistant Krikit baseline from properly adjusted belts then we will have a relatively solid point of adjustment using that gauge.
Just my 2 cents but I would not adjust your belt to 101 lbs. by the Krikit. While 101 lbs. would be correct conversion from Newtons, we do not know yet what corrilation there is between the gauge used by dealers specifically made to measure tension in our belt and the reading we will get from the Krikit for the same tension.
In other words, just because the Krikit says you have 101 lbs. of tension does not mean you are in spec.
We really need to do what Scotty says. Get a properly adjusted belt and then test it with the Krikit and see what it reads. Lamont said his Krikit read 180 lbs. after having his RT adjusted to the new spec. Either his Krikit was reading high or the tech set his belt tighter than current spec.
It really does not matter if the lbs. on the Krikit corrilate exatly to Newtons. What matters is the reading that a properly adjusted belt will give on the Krikit.
Once we get a consistant Krikit baseline from properly adjusted belts then we will have a relatively solid point of adjustment using that gauge.
Was your reading with the Spyder jacked up, or on the ground?:agree: This is why I was kicking myself when I forgot to take a reading from Deb or Brian in Cuba. Placement on the belt can also affect those kricket readings. I wouldn't think it could be accurate to more than +- 20lbs. I do like the feeling of the new tension being around 150 lbs.:thumbup:
I'm curios as to whether they used the new spec to adjust Lamont's belt, or the old one for the RT, which was 750 Newtons + or -. That would equate to 160 pounds, so 180 would have been within the old spec.
Placement on the belt can also affect those kricket readings. I wouldn't think it could be accurate to more than +- 20lbs. I do like the feeling of the new tension being around 150 lbs.:thumbup:
That is my understanding, also.Correct me if I,m wrong but my Tech said do not lift the Spyder from anywhere on the swing arm portion. It MUST be lifted forward on the frame before the swing arm?:yikes:
Was your reading with the Spyder jacked up, or on the ground?
Why don't we pool our money and purchase one to loan out? After the initial purchase, if anyone wanted to use it that paid into the pool they would pay the shipping fee.Too bad those sonic meters are so darned expensive.
Why don't we pool our money and purchase one to loan out? After the initial purchase, anyone wanted to use it that paid into the pool would pay the shipping fee.
Why don't we pool our money and purchase one to loan out? After the initial purchase, if anyone wanted to use it that paid into the pool they would pay the shipping fee.
Kricket seemed to be consistent .. but it sure doesn't take much to change it 20-30 lbs.
I suppose in a perfect world that would be fine. But someone would surely break it or it would get lost.
All we really need is a corrilation between a correctly adjusted belt and the Krikit reading. Then we'll all be set.
After getting a Krikit and following Ron's instructions, I couldn't agree more. It was EASY!All we really need is a corrilation between a correctly adjusted belt and the Krikit reading.
After getting a Krikit and following Ron's instructions, I couldn't agree more. It was EASY!
Come on people, for those of you that have had the service bulletin completed by your dealer, please get a Krikit and post your readings! (bjt, dltang)