Store #1 has " gun free zone" sign in window,
Store #2 has the gun welcome sign
Which store will the nidal hasans visit
This is a completely BS point.
No matter how many guns are present, the first one to shoot has a HUGE advantage.
And the terrorist won't stand out if his gun is visible.
And the general public is not known for good marksmanship......so the extra lead flying around might actually be MORE dangerous.
The assassin expects to die in the process.
Listen, I don't like to "debate" stuff like this in a forum with an entirely different purpose but...............
If you are going to debate and try to draw an intelligent conclusion, you need to consider ALL of the factors, not just the emotional ones.
The difference between a fine upstanding law abiding citizen with a gun and a criminal with a gun is: about 3 seconds.
The more handguns in circulation, the more gun deaths there will be; and most of them will NOT be actual criminals.
Most will be friends, family members and children.
Calling it gun "control" is itself biased toward an emotional response. It should be referred to as "gun restrictions".
We require a drivers license for a car, whose purpose is not to kill things.
Then there are guns, whose main purpose IS to kill things but no license required at all.
If you support removing all restrictions from owning guns, then you support a large increase in accidental gun deaths.
That is a fact, whether you like it or not.
And finally.........where do you think that "criminals" GET the guns that they have ??
The overwhelming answer is: From a person who initially bought it legally.