• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Sensible gun control

" No Firearms allowed here"

A store, coffee shop, eatery, ect. that displays a sign that makes legal concealed carry patrons unwelcome will not get my business. But I don't call them names.nojoke

Kaos
 
It is very common here to walk into a Dairy Queen or other restaurant and see people openly packing. That's the way it is. Open carry is perfectly legal here in Arizona and concealed is legal for all. No big deal...... I wouldn't be caught dead cruising without my Body Guard. (S&W 38). Years ago I did a lot of hunting and wore a pistol all day. No issues. I quit hunting but still often see hunters with their side arms in public. Again, no big deal..... I'd rather see them in control of their firearm that leave them in the truck for some pimply faced 15 year old to steal and do bad stuff. Flame Away......
 
Last edited:
Store #1 has " gun free zone" sign in window,
Store #2 has the gun welcome sign
Which store will the nidal hasans visit
 
A store, coffee shop, eatery, ect. that displays a sign that makes legal concealed carry patrons unwelcome will not get my business. But I don't call them names.nojoke

Kaos

Seems as though Utah Pete has an issue with our 2nd amendment to the constitution. And I guess he doesn't realize name-calling only increases resentment.

So Pete, ya wanna lighten-up?
 
Store #1 has " gun free zone" sign in window,
Store #2 has the gun welcome sign
Which store will the nidal hasans visit

This is a completely BS point.

No matter how many guns are present, the first one to shoot has a HUGE advantage.
And the terrorist won't stand out if his gun is visible.
And the general public is not known for good marksmanship......so the extra lead flying around might actually be MORE dangerous.
The assassin expects to die in the process.

Listen, I don't like to "debate" stuff like this in a forum with an entirely different purpose but...............
If you are going to debate and try to draw an intelligent conclusion, you need to consider ALL of the factors, not just the emotional ones.

The difference between a fine upstanding law abiding citizen with a gun and a criminal with a gun is: about 3 seconds.

The more handguns in circulation, the more gun deaths there will be; and most of them will NOT be actual criminals.
Most will be friends, family members and children.

Calling it gun "control" is itself biased toward an emotional response. It should be referred to as "gun restrictions".

We require a drivers license for a car, whose purpose is not to kill things.
Then there are guns, whose main purpose IS to kill things but no license required at all.

If you support removing all restrictions from owning guns, then you support a large increase in accidental gun deaths.
That is a fact, whether you like it or not.

And finally.........where do you think that "criminals" GET the guns that they have ??
The overwhelming answer is: From a person who initially bought it legally.
 
This is a completely BS point.

No matter how many guns are present, the first one to shoot has a HUGE advantage.
And the terrorist won't stand out if his gun is visible.
And the general public is not known for good marksmanship......so the extra lead flying around might actually be MORE dangerous.
The assassin expects to die in the process.

Listen, I don't like to "debate" stuff like this in a forum with an entirely different purpose but...............
If you are going to debate and try to draw an intelligent conclusion, you need to consider ALL of the factors, not just the emotional ones.

The difference between a fine upstanding law abiding citizen with a gun and a criminal with a gun is: about 3 seconds.

The more handguns in circulation, the more gun deaths there will be; and most of them will NOT be actual criminals.
Most will be friends, family members and children.

Calling it gun "control" is itself biased toward an emotional response. It should be referred to as "gun restrictions".

We require a drivers license for a car, whose purpose is not to kill things.
Then there are guns, whose main purpose IS to kill things but no license required at all.

If you support removing all restrictions from owning guns, then you support a large increase in accidental gun deaths.
That is a fact, whether you like it or not.

And finally.........where do you think that "criminals" GET the guns that they have ??
The overwhelming answer is: From a person who initially bought it legally.



sounds like you'd be the patron of store # 1, i wish you well.
also my conclusion is totally valid, how many mass shootings have there been in gun friendly environments.
have a good day

ps, your nonpoint about bad guys getting guns,
remember something called FAST AND FURIOUS

 
Last edited:
We lived in Mesa, AZ for 6 1/2 years in the eighties. Open carry was legal then but I don't think I ever saw more than three people who did. One did so on a regular basis and apparently lived somewhere in our area. He, however, was not one that most people would be comfortable being around based upon appearances alone. I never spoke to the man and like I said, he was not someone I would have been comfortable approaching for any reason. He never caused any problems beyond making some people nervous as far as I know.

The branch of the Valley National Bank that we went to was built in an old West theme complete with a sign saying "Check your guns before entering" . I remarked to one of the tellers about the sign being a "nice touch" or something to that effect and she said that it wasn't for decoration, it was meant as a practical requirement before coming into the lobby for business purposes. (The check your gun part meaning to deposit them in a lock box or whatever they provided for securing your gun(s) while in their bank.)

That said, there is a huge difference between the way firearms were treated say, 30 years ago and today. I also don't think that it has been a change for the better. When I was younger my Dad taught me how to handle a firearm and the respect that they deserve. Also driven into my head was the huge amount of responsibility that owning and handling a firearm entailed. That seems to be the missing factor in far too many instances where people and guns are concerned nowadays.

To many it offers a sense of security for themselves and their families. The majority of them handle the responsibility of carrying a firearm well.......you will never know they have one on their person.

Then you have a smaller group that seems to need a gun to make up for what they are lacking in confidence. Be it in their manhood, their sense of worth or, God forbid, their intelligence. Any of those three, or possibly others not mentioned, are what scares me. Too often, they are the ones that are smart enough to pass course requirements (where required) but aren't quite smart enough to fulfil the total requirements of gun ownership such as proper storage of unused guns and ammo, just for starters.

As for me and my family, if we are in a restaurant eating, for, example, and a person walks in with a gun that is visible, we are making a hopefully discreet exit immediately. That means that we may face a problem over an unpaid bill but that is fine, we can settle that after the fact.

The problem ultimately comes down to the question that is impossible to know. Is he (she) a good guy or not? Myself, I don't plan on waiting around to make that determination!
 
Well, I guess I was just called a idiot.. In this instance, proud to be one...:thumbup:

Only if you are the store owner with the sign. He's the one I called an idiot. Why would you want to alienate 1/2 of your potential clientele? That's idiotic.
 
When trouble happens Nobody calls the police because they have cool uniforms. :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
 
Only if you are the store owner with the sign. He's the one I called an idiot. Why would you want to alienate 1/2 of your potential clientele? That's idiotic.

So, your saying those that don't carry will never enter that store?

Seems idiotic.
 
Back
Top