Didn't say there was anything wrong at this point ( just reading all the horror stories on relatively low mileage Spyders). I have to replace the rear tire due to road damage (spyder has just over 6000 mi.) and I am trying to decide whether to go ahead and replace the bearings at the same time. I don't want to wait until I spin a bearing and ruin the hub and who knows what else. It's just hard for me to get used to the idea that this kind of maintenance is required in so few miles as being reported.nojoke Michael:doorag:
Here is where my money is bet.
I think BRP got a bunch of marginal Chinese bearings and hence the failures at this mileage.
I also think Spyder owners are turning out to much higher mileage riders than average by a bunch. My reason for saying this is, I go to rallies all over the contry and see most 3 to 5 year old bikes still not having 20 K on them, more or less the 50K plus miles some guys have put on their Spyders in a little over a year.
A bad run of bearings can happen from time to time. HD had huge motor problems with their then new Twin Cam motors in 1999, 2000, and 2001 due to bad cam bearings. This kind of stuff does happen.
I have had my bearings out when I had the wheels and sprocket chromed and with over 30 years as a certified motorcycle technician I do not believe they are undersize for the job. The sprocket bearing in paticular is a huge double wide unit more than up to anything a 106hp motor can throw at it.
I just think BRP got some bearings from a vendor in China, that although don't fail super fast, could last longer than they do for sure. That is why I said in another thread I will be crossing over the numbers and using USA made bearings in my hubs when I have to swap the rear tire for sure.
MM