We were out today in the Tunnel of The Trees in Northern Michigan .We stopped for lunch at an old inn.2 RT limited in Metallic Bronze.6 Harley's rode in.We answered a hundred questions.They were fascinated by the bikes and thought them really cool.Really, though the OP may have gotten to a few, I think most responders have simply taken the opportunity to answer the question.
And why not? If you're happy with your ride you don't have to be defensive.
You should have been at a certain gas stop on the way to Durango where an 'Old School Biker' just started ripping into Lamont's RT beyond belief (and Spyders in general). This guy was a Mega-Hater! I think this guys blood pressure was probably double the temperature (and it was HOT!).
We should have video'd that one! Classic person that had all the answers and no clue what he was talking about. I don't think any of us will ever forget that guy.
Is everyone having fun posting to themselfs ????????? :roflblack:
I have read this entire thread, and it has been very interesting to see how others feel about their 'rydes'. We're not posting to ourselves, and if the OP comes back, he will learn that it's a matter of choice, and it should not be questioned, as we would not question his or anyone else's choice of a Harley, Vulcan, Gold Wing, etc.
And, it's 'themselves', not 'themselfs'. :chat:
And it's "Shouldn't"----------- not "should not"
BTW........ you have a run on sentence with way to many commas, so we are even. :roflblack:
Now get back to work and post to yourself. :joke:
I don't know where you learned your English grammar, but it's not really important. And, shouldn't is the contraction for should not. Either one is correct. Just very petty, and I apologize if I embarrassed you.
:agree: End this now, let this op start a argument on some other site [who cares what a 'alleged' hd rider says :cheers:Aside from the fact the OP is polite, he sure knows how to push our buttons.
Excactly......... hence my comment back at ya. :thumbup: I'm not the type of guy that cares what people think of me so...... no I'm not embarrassed but I do like your spunk. :cheers:
The anger is simple. The inference is that Spyders are somehow less than two wheelers. And, by implication, that we are less because we don't ride bikes. In a way, it is more incidious because the accusation is phrased with some level of respect (it feels a bit passive/aggressive to me, honestly).
To top it off, at one time or another we've all asked ourselves similar questions, and it plays on that as well.
What it comes down to is that we enjoy riding our Spyders, but the questions plays to issues of personal ability and value, as well as how we are seen by others, which always pushes buttons.
I do think it likely that somebody was having some "fun" at our expense, and we, perhaps, played into it a little bit too much. Or not?
One added thought:
Part of the issue is that the premise of the question assumes that we are riding on training wheels, and that bikes are more difficult and better for that reason. It isn't true, but when it's part of the premise it gets questioned a bit less, and stings a bit more.
Glider3J;487677 The world would be a terrible place if we all married the same woman said:That woman would be pretty busy.