• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Next Gen Spyder Drvetrain

If you could choose the next generation drivetrain for the Spyder which would it be


  • Total voters
    205
First 24 hour summary:

* Most Popular setup: Shaft/Increased Engine Displacement/Semi Auto Trans
* 92% of respondents would like to have shaft drive
* Riders still like to “go through the gears” with 40% opting for a Semi Auto Trans; although a full Auto Trans has a strong following
* 71% of respondents would like more HP
* Surprisingly only 8% want to continue with a belt final drive

Interesting informal stats. I’ll summarize again in a week. BRP are you listening? :)

. . . I thought you were serious until that last question :D
 
I don't NEED more power. but I wouldn't mind it.

Belt drive - it's more efficient than shaft and cleaner/quieter than chain so I don't mind it. But alignment and issues with gravel are a tad annoying.

Better mpg? Sure, but my brother's '05 wing gets around the same as my '14 RTS so, we're not far off there, and I have a smaller engine and heavier bike.

transmission - this is my issue. The SE6 feels like a half-way measure, and had I know before hand, I'd have gone for a lower spec RT and added the stuff I wanted. Either let me shift or don't.
 
That's easy, a Honda flat six with shaft drive :spyder:

Yep- I Google Honda Neo Wing and Yamaha Niken every couple weeks to see if those OEMs are taking these platforms to the next level and challenge BRP. Be nice if one of them would buyout Tilting Motor Works so you could feel comfortable giving $30+k to a small manufacturer.
 
Has anybody here ever had a belt failure ? Is it a Can-Am thing ? Lots of H-D's and Indian/Victory's with years/miles on belts with low failure rates. And, yes, some serious power with built Harley's having no issues with belts...
 
First 24 hour summary:

* Most Popular setup: Shaft/Increased Engine Displacement/Semi Auto Trans
* 92% of respondents would like to have shaft drive
* Riders still like to “go through the gears” with 64% opting for a Semi Auto Trans; although a full Auto Trans has a strong following
* 71% of respondents would like more HP
* Surprisingly only 8% want to continue with a belt final drive

Interesting informal stats. I’ll summarize again in a week. BRP are you listening? :)

If I understand the Honda DTC transmission with its 2 clutches, it can be used semi-auto or fully auto at the riders discretion. Pitch in Honda DTC riders, let me know. No personal experience with the new stuff.
 
If I understand the Honda DTC transmission with its 2 clutches, it can be used semi-auto or fully auto at the riders discretion. Pitch in Honda DTC riders, let me know. No personal experience with the new stuff.

DCT which started as a curiosity for Honda has turned into a big hit on all its models. I would have it on a bike without hesitation.
 
DCT which started as a curiosity for Honda has turned into a big hit on all its models. I would have it on a bike without hesitation.

The 1976 Hondamatic 750 had a similar transmission. Just like a car with Drive and Low settings on an automatic. I bought a new one and had it for a couple years. No hand shifting required. Just snick it into D or L, turn the throttle and go.
 
Last edited:
The 1976 Hondamatic 750 had a similar transmission. Just like a car with Drive and Low settings on an automatic. I actually had one of those for a couple years. No hand shifting required. Just snick it into D or L, turn the throttle and go.

Almost bought one of those a couple months back.
 
Has anybody here ever had a belt failure ? Is it a Can-Am thing ? Lots of H-D's and Indian/Victory's with years/miles on belts with low failure rates. And, yes, some serious power with built Harley's having no issues with belts...
59583 miles no bet problems here. (Knocking on wood) shaft would be little more comfort in road work areas with gravel & tar chip.
 
As I understand it the Honda DTC has 2 clutches, one for each shaft in the transmission. This allows it to automatically shift up and down. Our Spyders having the one clutch only have half of our shifting available as automatic. At least that's the way the article described it.
 
I opted for the current setup. This keeps things easier for the dealership, and the tech only has to be familiar with one basic drivetrain. Tends to help keep costs down. If they went to a shaft drive/bigger engine, then in a few years the technicians will eventually become less familiar with your older bike.

Personally, I think the current engine has more than enough horsepower and grunt.

At my last duty station, I had a GI come back after several consecutive overseas tours. He got his then 20-year-old Yamaha out of long term storage at his parents' house, and took it the local dealer, who wouldn't touch it. No longer had parts in the system for it, and the techs weren't familiar with it.
 
I opted for the current setup. This keeps things easier for the dealership, and the tech only has to be familiar with one basic drivetrain. Tends to help keep costs down. If they went to a shaft drive/bigger engine, then in a few years the technicians will eventually become less familiar with your older bike.

Personally, I think the current engine has more than enough horsepower and grunt.



At my last duty station, I had a GI come back after several consecutive overseas tours. He got his then 20-year-old Yamaha out of long term storage at his parents' house, and took it the local dealer, who wouldn't touch it. No longer had parts in the system for it, and the techs weren't familiar with it.

Good points. While buying a Can-Am later this year; my current daily rider is 47 years old- a 1973 Honda Scrambler. I bought from the original owner last year and have been in a continual process of refreshing mechanical items to bring it up to a reliable performance level. So far compression is good in both cylinders so no need for an engine rebuild. Tell your GI friend he’ll need to tap the vintage bike repair network which is alive and robust as us Boomers all want to ride the bikes of our youth and the vintage repair market is happy to accommodate. I have Atlanta Motor Works near by and they do great work on all makes.

7C26A5B9-8F2B-4FA6-BFE8-B3119FA6D12D.jpg
 
For the F-3 sport ..a 4 cyl motor....no turbo..a turbo might cause problems in the long term.....horsepower increase to 200
HP... And a increase in torque to match...maybe increase to an SE-8 speed trans. ....to compete against the the BMW and Honda neo-wing..the Honda is coming ...the belt system is fine for the sport.
 
Has anybody here ever had a belt failure ? Is it a Can-Am thing ? Lots of H-D's and Indian/Victory's with years/miles on belts with low failure rates. And, yes, some serious power with built Harley's having no issues with belts...

Got through two belts so far, both damaged by stones. A common problem over here because of the chip and tar resurfacing.
 
I'd go manual trans before going back to the semi-auto I have now. If I'd have known before I bought...

The Honda DCT has 2 clutches, one for odd gears and one for even. It can be "manually" shifted just like many cars/trucks today. As I recall it also has sport and tour modes.

Honestly, a 4 cyl would be ok, but I've got to say - having owned mostly 4 cylinder bikes, the triple is surprisingly smooth with great torque. If I was going to pick an engine for the next RT, I think I'd go with the V4 from the Honda ST. It would fit between the wheels easily enough, and if oriented front to back, lends itself easily to shaft drive.

I don't mind a belt at all, they're the most efficient of the three drive trains. But, shaft is less worrisome for some.

200HP? Why? People buy horsepower, but they drive torque.
 
Back
Top