FlyingBoat
New member
I would NEVER suck out the oil where the engine was designed with a plug to let it drain out the bottom. Sucking out the oil just will NOT get all the containments that DRAINING will get out of the engine. Yes, some of these oil change places do this, but I don't take my vehicles to them. I think years ago I heard that a Honda car engine was designed like this, to suck out the oil vs a drain plug. So for me, I will never suck out oil out of any vehicle engine that has a drain plug
The Mercedes dealers suck the oil out. They don't drain it and their cars do have drain plugs. (My Crossfire is a Mercedes built engine). So I do the same.
I wonder if we analyzed the oil for example on a Spyder with 6K miles vs one with 1K, but 12 months time. Which oil do you think would be in better shape? I don't know, but I think the 12 months and little miles would be in better shape. It would certainly be in better shape than a Spyder after 9.3K miles, right?
I am thinking that the oil in the Spyder which had the oil sucked out after 1 year and 1K and replaced with fresh oil would be in better shape than the Spyder which kept the same oil from 4 to 9.3K during the year.
Could there be some contaminant? Sure. There is also some contaminant in a Spyder with 4.7K, right? And yet you don't change at 4.7k.
But I don't know. I don't know if the tube gets down far enough to reach the bottom of the pan.
I was hearing of oil changes costing close to $500. If that is the case it may be worth while to have it tested. Particularly if you are only putting 2K or so on in a year.
Maybe I will do that. If I run only 2K in a year, I will suck it out. Put in fresh and have it analyzed and compared to your Spyder with 4.7K on the oil change. Which do you think will have worse results?