I know , I know, this is old news (Hand Brake lever)

[Bob Denman]

You can't ride scared; just alert...

 

[mooneych]

You can't ride scared; just alert...

Perhaps we should put hand brakes in cars as well! :roflblack:

Seriously, the above comment should be reflected on carefully.

 

[major911]

How do those of you with lots of miles on a Spyder feel about no hand brake lever? What is BRP's reason for not providing it? Should Spyders come standard with a hand brake lever in addition to the foot brake pedal? If enough people asked for it, could it become a reality? I guess I should ask ,is this something people want or am I just rambling?

Seems like a matter of choice. If you want a hand brake you are welcome to add one on but if you don't want one your not being forced to have it. Much easier to add a brake than to remove one. Personally I like the integrated braking system on the spyder. JMHO.:doorag:

 

[MouthPiece]

You can't ride scared; just alert...

:agree: 100%

 

[OldDog]

Thanks for all the input. I know you'll get opinions on both sides of the fence. I understand the muscle and mind adaptation thing. I haven't driven a stick shift car for a number of years, but I can hop right in and drive it. My personal preference would be to have a hand brake. Would I buy one? I would have to answer that after getting some time in the saddle.

I understand BRP's reasoning for not supplying it standard. I certainly understand the need of a front brake for those with physical constraints. I'd like to hear more comments.

 

[mick ruhdorf]

Hmm

hi all when i first bought my spyder i thought i would need a hand-brake so i organised a cable hand-brake ($200 VS $1400 hydralic ) but after a couple of hundred miles i realised i didnt need it so when the parts turned up they went into storage, i was wrong and now i dont miss the hand-brake at all.
cheers mick :doorag:

 

[NancysToy]

.....Even when I rode two wheels I used the rear footbrake 90% of the time......

Unless the motorcycle has integrated brakes, you are missing over half of your braking power if you do that. 60%-70% of your braking ability comes from the front brake on a two wheeler. Both brakes should be used for maximum braking force.

 

[Bob Denman]

:agree: You would think that folks would remember this one after all of these years...

 

[major911]

Unless the motorcycle has integrated brakes, you are missing over half of your braking power if you do that. 60%-70% of your braking ability comes from the front brake on a two wheeler. Both brakes should be used for maximum braking force.

Thanks for pointing out the error of my ways. That wasn't exactly the point I was trying to make with the rest of my comment, but you are correct sir as usual. I ammended my post accordingly.

 

[OldDog]

Unless the motorcycle has integrated brakes, you are missing over half of your braking power if you do that. 60%-70% of your braking ability comes from the front brake on a two wheeler. Both brakes should be used for maximum braking force.

:agree: I guess that's why I favor both a hand and foot brake. I realize that the Spyder's braking is balanced across the front and rear brakes by the ABS and is totally controlled by the foot pedal. I just feel the hand lever is an extra measure of safety. As was pointed out, it appears the predominant rider group for Spyders is us ol' Senior citizens who once or still do ride a two wheeler(in reference to grabbin' air.) Anyway, this is a good discussion. On another note, the new Brembo brakes on the 2013 models will really haul them down.

 

[Bob Denman]

Well this has been fun...
Thanks for pulling this topic out again! :thumbup:

 

[SteveMac]

Perhaps we should put hand brakes in cars as well! :roflblack:

Seriously, the above comment should be reflected on carefully.

I agree it should be reflected on carefully. Would this same logic apply to ATGATT? I think not.

If the rider feels more secure adding (or even feeling the need for a hand brake), then that is hardly cause to say he is riding "scared". Simply a foolish comment from my vantage. Otherwise, one could extend that logic to any safety measures that riders take. I have a hand brake and I'd feel pretty secure saying I don't ride scared.

I completely agree with Papoandma. I have been presented with emergency braking measures when not "in traffic". To think that just because you are on the open road that nothing can cause the need for emergency braking is not wise. I, like many others have impairments on my right side that caused me concern in an emergency braking situation with a right foot only brake. So I added the ISCI, and didn't mind the cost one bit. It does what I need perfectly.

I don't think it should necessarily be a standard factory option, but I do think it is a good idea for those of us who need it or even want it. Just as ATGATT is a good idea for those who feel the need.

But to infer that Papoandma is "riding scared" is a bit of a reach. We might also want to consider this, when those of us on the board tout any added safety measure.

 

[Bob Denman]

Hi Steve,
If I may explain...
This discussion was starting to become a "Let's point out all of the dangers on the road" flavor. I was just trying to cork that bottle before we got mired in all of the horror stories that we all know are out there... :shocked:

So Papoandma,
I wasn't trying to say that you guys were riding scared; I was just trying to get away from that portion of the topic... sorry! pps:

 

[SteveMac]

Hi Steve,
If I may explain...
This discussion was starting to become a "Let's point out all of the dangers on the road" flavor. I was just trying to cork that bottle before we got mired in all of the horror stories that we all know are out there... :shocked:

So Papoandma,
I wasn't trying to say that you guys were riding scared; I was just trying to get away from that portion of the topic... sorry! pps:

No worries Bob. It just caught me wrong I suppose. I could just imagine the uproar if that comment was made about other safety measures.

I should also point out that I am in favor of a hand brake with the caviat that the integrated system is maintained.

 

[Bob Denman]

I also like the idea of the handbrake system...
I know that someday; bad legs will force my hand. :shocked:
But until then... hyea: :roflblack:

 

[r1100rider]

Seems like a matter of choice. If you want a hand brake you are welcome to add one on but if you don't want one your not being forced to have it. Much easier to add a brake than to remove one. Personally I like the integrated braking system on the spyder. JMHO.:doorag:

On a Spyder the handbrake is intergrated into all wheel braking the handbrake doesn't interfere with the foot brake at all of you didn't want to use it you don't have to if for some reason it bugged you one bolt and the lever could be gone like I said before if it was on all production it would cost very little at that level ,I have one and I notice that in quick stops I use both it gives me more force and my hand is pulling a instant before my foot is pushing it handbrake should be there if you don't want it don't use it but it sure wouldn't hurt a thing if it was there

 

[asp125]

My wife and I both still ride motorcycles and use the front brake all the time; 80% of the stopping power is up front (sportbikes). At first we thought it was stupid of Can Am to not include a front brake. Coming from making snowmobiles, it must've never occurred to BRP to need a hand brake. But after a few months I can only recall one instance (yellow light) where I grabbed air and stopped well into the crosswalk. Agreed a handbrake option would be great for owners coming off motorcycles, it's more ingrained in their muscle memory. If there was a group buy or ISCI can come down below $1K I might consider putting one on. Until then I'll train my right leg.

 

[OldDog]

Unless the motorcycle has integrated brakes, you are missing over half of your braking power if you do that. 60%-70% of your braking ability comes from the front brake on a two wheeler. Both brakes should be used for maximum braking force.

I remember a mistake I made a number of years ago. I was turning around in the middle of the street and for whatever reason I tapped the front brake. Down I went immediately. My riding buddies laughed. No harm done except my pride. At parking lot speeds use the rear brake. At higher speeds the majority of the braking is done by the front brakes. My mind thinks of highsides and lowsides.

 

[MarkLawson]

...I understand BRP's reasoning for not supplying it standard. I certainly understand the need of a front brake for those with physical constraints. I'd like to hear more comments.

I haven't yet seen BRP's reason for not supplying it standard. The only responses from them I am aware of is that they have no plan to add one. If anyone knows their reasoning, as they have stated it, I'd sure like to know too.

My 2001 Goldwing has integrated braking with ABS, but Honda kept the hand brake lever. It's not new technology at all to two wheelers.

I, for one, would love to have it for the same reason I have it on the Goldwing. It's another option when my foot is away from the foot brake. Have I bought it? No, and may not, unless I get a great price on it. It's a risk vs. benefit vs. cost thing to me.

 

[Neez]

I was unhappy with my reaction time using the foot brake until I extended the length of the foot pedal to bring it closer to my foot's riding position. Now that I no longer have to twist my leg to apply the brake, I am perfectly content to be without a handbrake.