I agree with Bob. If speed is your main concern, there are several better choices to itch that scratch. I'm sure the BRP engineers never designed the RT to win 1/4 mile runs.
If however you're looking for an alternative vehicle, one that is easy to operate & handle, one that is more comfortable to ride than any other bike, one that produces no heat to the rider; one that has a long range fuel tank capable of taking you well north of 200 miles per tank; then you need to give the new RT some serious consideration - as it really doesn't have any competition. That being said, it goes fast enough for me.
I hate the 200mph speedo. Such a waste of space and the normal cruising speeds are all pushed down to the bottom.
Maybe speed isn't his MAIN concern but he wants to know. Speed isn't my #1 priority or I wouldn't have gotten a Spyder, but it was part of the decision.
Always shake my head at responses people get when performance is discussed here....
If you bought a Spyder for speed :shocked:; you shoulda bought a Hayabusa! :roflblack:
If you bought it for the relaxing miles, and good times: :2thumbs:
I am curious too. Please let me know when you find out. I know that my 2012 RS-S will do 117 mph, but seems to be drag limited. Nobody asked so I will, are you talking about an RT?
And don't worry about the "super safety Sams/Sallys", they always feel the need to tell other people how they should ride. I don't listen because they don't pay my bills. :crackpipe:
Just sayin'............
Not really a "Safety-Crat"; just wondering if a Spyder was being purchased for the wrong reason... If another bike would do a better job ;:shocked: I'd hate to see an unhappy consumer.![]()