Although Illegal. People do it and aslong as you live where emissions testing is not done its probably not an issue. But:dontknow:I just bought an F3-S, and i'd like to ask all you SL people a question....
IF YOU REMOVE THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER (BRP = pre-muffler), has you dealer informed you that it will violate the warranty....?????opcorn:
curious.....
Dan P
Easley, SC
SPYD3R
My mistake! I didn't know thatNot illegal (except maybe in California) catalytic converters are not required on motorcycles.
Cruzr Joe
I just bought an F3-S, and i'd like to ask all you SL people a question....
IF YOU REMOVE THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER (BRP = pre-muffler), has you dealer informed you that it will violate the warranty....?????
Dan,I just bought an F3-S, and i'd like to ask all you SL people a question....
IF YOU REMOVE THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER (BRP = pre-muffler), has you dealer informed you that it will violate the warranty....?????opcorn:
curious.....
Dan P
Easley, SC
SPYD3R
Dan,
My understanding of vehicle warranty law, at least in the US, is that a manufacturer cannot deny warranty due to an alteration unless they can ascertain that the defect they are denying warranty for happened as a result of the alteration. Obviously the manufacturer has some latitude in their interpretation of that situation, but at least they may have to defend their denial if challenged legally. The fact that the modification may be illegal in certain states is a separate issue. I've had the cat removed on my 2013 RT for safety reasons relating to the issues that BRP is now dealing with with the NHTSA. So they would be hard pressed to deny my entire warranty as a result of that modification; and in fact, they continue to provide me with warranty service.
I'm curious though, to know why you would consider removing the cat on an F3? I wouldn't think there would be much to gained there in either the reduction of heat or the slight gain in HP.
IF YOU REMOVE THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER (BRP = pre-muffler), has you dealer informed you that it will violate the warranty....?????
There are different warranties on the bike. One is for the emissions system, and if you modify the emissions system, which includes the cat, then the warranty on that is usually considered void.
My understanding of vehicle warranty law, at least in the US, is that a manufacturer cannot deny warranty due to an alteration unless they can ascertain that the defect they are denying warranty for happened as a result of the alteration. Obviously the manufacturer has some latitude in their interpretation of that situation, but at least they may have to defend their denial if challenged legally. The fact that the modification may be illegal in certain states is a separate issue. I've had the cat removed on my 2013 RT for safety reasons relating to the issues that BRP is now dealing with with the NHTSA. So they would be hard pressed to deny my entire warranty as a result of that modification; and in fact, they continue to provide me with warranty service..
:agree: with Lamont. I have compared the sound before and after on the F3 and it sounds more aggressive and you will be heard on the road!:doorag:I'm curious though, to know why you would consider removing the cat on an F3? I wouldn't think there would be much to gained there in either the reduction of heat or the slight gain in HP.
Oh. Well yeah, there IS that. My 2013 RT sounds a bit deeper and throatier after the cat bypass.Because the sound is great! :doorag:
Because the sound is great! :doorag:
Where can I get a CAT delete I've looked and am not sure of where to buy one.![]()
So, from what you just have wrote; if the brakes on the Spyder go out, the warranty is void because I removed the "cat"...
Read below.
Because the sound is great! :doorag:
You missed this part of my post "There are different warranties on the bike. One is for the emissions system,..." There is a separate warranty on emission systems. And if you remove or modify the emission system, then the warranty on the emission system is no longer valid. So if your brakes are part of that, I guess your comment would be true.
Check http://transportpolicy.net/index.php?title=US:_Motorcycles:_Emissions.
BINGO.....
thx Lamont.....
Dan