• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Best ECU flash results ever for me

Best map has about 500 miles

I'll try to focus the answer more directed to what an RT owner needs to hear. The throttle transition between the stock mapping and the performance mapping is seamless. If I didn't have an AFR gauge hooked up, I wouldn't be able to detect when it first starts. Monster Fuel has been very picky about the importance of this seamless transition throttle area. I have driven an entire tank on the stock mapping and I got my typical 36 mpg. But this is hilly area and does't reflect highway cruising. I have driven two tanks in the sport driving mode where I take what the road offers. I zip up to 100 mph often and power out of different mixed speed corners. Driving like that I drop down to 32 mpg. Driving like a man possessed and determined to risk my life to beat my fast friends on sport bikes, she drinks pretty good. Three of my life time sport bike friends say I ride faster now than I do on my Ninja SX1000. They are stunned at what $350 plus shipping gets.
Below 3,000 rpm there isn't a practical reason to crank the throttle 100% unless your doing a dead stop run. Driving in the sport mode as stated above I get all that fun driving from 4,000 rpm to 7,400 rpm as there is no trophy nor any need for more power while driving like this. Even 5th gear really benefits from the open throttle at very low rpms. I have significantly reduced the need to down shift to get to a power area for getting the bike moving.
But the truth is, FOR ME AND MY STYLE OF BAD DRIVING HABITS, I wouldn't give up the 9,200 red line for nothing. Don't have to use it, except on my annoying friends and their, " it's not a real motorcycle" attitude. If I want, I can power up and lay down 50' of rubber. First gear hits 9,200 red line in just seconds. A second gear shift hits a peak power area and follows through to red line or well over 80 mph. 3rd gear also drops into a peak power area and powers to about 8,900 rpm which is about 98 mph in about 10 seconds. Pretty impressive for an 1,100 pound sail boat. YOUR INDIVIDUAL RESULTS CAN VARY.
Absolutely hands down the best performance gain I have ever gotten for the buck. And I'm as picky of a customer as it gets.




Quick question for you. How many miles have you driven the bike since the reflash? As it seems you have gone several iterations, perhaps how many miles total on the reflashed ECU? How is your everyday startup and driveability? Any idiosyncrasies you have noted good or poor? Fuel milage change? I would expect with more use of the right grip the fuel consumption might increase but cruising mileage may improve? Stay the same? Suffer a bit?
 
So... Im not certain, Is this available to be done now? or more research going on. Interested for my 2016 F3S

Yes. It's available now.
Just in the middle of making some videos, adding a direct web page and a more spyder focus flash sheet.

From requests,
on the testing bench for future is
- sprocket switching programming
- yaw / angle relaxation
- semi-auto gear change smoothness / modifications
 
Fair enough. I figured things would be different with the fly-by-wire setup.

I'm not so much into top-end as to how quickly I can get to 60 or from 40 to 80, etc.....

Have to wait until fall or winter to send mine in.....too much good weather to ride in here in Michigan that I don't want to miss out on....

Had a quick look at a V990 file. It looks to me that the v990 is speed limited at 222kph. (or 138mph). Hard limit. Cuts injectors and spark. This threshold is not verified by me and I am not familiar with different models that could be different. It should pull the same all the way to that threshold. However, they could reduce ignition timing by rpm to limit output a bit.
 
I know exactly the limits each model or file. I can see it with my own 2 eyes. But i am not going to give specific info or numbers that could help a person that tries to do what we do. There are companies or people that change a bit of timing in the low end. Try to sell run more octane and get more torque. Or claim this bosch ecu is more advanced than an auto world. Or has 100 maps for fuel alone. LMAO. Funny stuff.

If you want to know your limit on your model - hammer down. You will find it. If you want a change in when its delivered (i.e: pull to xx speed before shutting down) then that can easily be done. If you think you slow down at speeds between 80-108mph (model and gear dependant) because you ran put of power - thats not the case at all.

Mate dont come on this forum and start taking the piss out of other people or other companies just to make your self look all high and mighty and the god of all tuners there is no need for it.

You have tuned 1 spyder then tell everyone how your tune is the best.

I have custom tuned many many spyders including 5 people on this forum that i know of since the spyder was released on both the siemens and bosch ecu, i don't claim to be the best and never will but i do know what im doing and what i tell my customers is what i deliver.
I receive 2 -3 ecu's every week from around the world let alone the ones i do in my own back yard with not 1 unhappy customer

There are plenty more companies around that tune these ecu's including canam and do a great job do you see me bagging them?

Why dont you just answer peoples questions with your vast knowledge of spyders and leave it at that (why bag others) it just makes you look narrow minded.

I see you do all your testing on 1 persons spyder by sending his ecu back and forth have you yourself actually ridden a spyder?


To other forum members sorry for the rant i just don't see the need for some to bag others its not needed....
Jason
 
Had a quick look at a V990 file. It looks to me that the v990 is speed limited at 222kph. (or 138mph). Hard limit. Cuts injectors and spark. This threshold is not verified by me and I am not familiar with different models that could be different. It should pull the same all the way to that threshold. However, they could reduce ignition timing by rpm to limit output a bit.

The 990 was a fly-by-wire. The 998 used in my GS was not. Doesn't really much matter now. Don't want to go that fast anyway... just want to be able to accelerate as quickly as possible.....
 
But . . . you just did!

AJ

Technically he 'counter-bagged' him.... ;)

Hope this thread doesn't disappear or get shut down.

Once someone joins as a site sponsor then there may not be much posting allowed from others doing tuning. Sponsors are protected, which I fully understand, but also don't want good information censored. Hopefully everyone can place nice and we can all learn!

I'm sure many are able to do this and do a good job. Wish there was a reputable source in the USA... I hate shipping things out of the country... always been a headache for me... even just to Canada... guess they don't want my packages either! :roflblack:
 
Mate dont come on this forum and start taking the piss out of other people or other companies just to make your self look all high and mighty and the god of all tuners there is no need for it.

You have tuned 1 spyder then tell everyone how your tune is the best.

I have custom tuned many many spyders including 5 people on this forum that i know of since the spyder was released on both the siemens and bosch ecu, i don't claim to be the best and never will but i do know what im doing and what i tell my customers is what i deliver.
I receive 2 -3 ecu's every week from around the world let alone the ones i do in my own back yard with not 1 unhappy customer

There are plenty more companies around that tune these ecu's including canam and do a great job do you see me bagging them?

Why dont you just answer peoples questions with your vast knowledge of spyders and leave it at that (why bag others) it just makes you look narrow minded.

I see you do all your testing on 1 persons spyder by sending his ecu back and forth have you yourself actually ridden a spyder?


To other forum members sorry for the rant i just don't see the need for some to bag others its not needed....
Jason


When you post stuff that is blatantly wrong - I am going to call it. Sorry if that gets you all ruffled up. If you don't like it - don't post BS stuff like that in the first place.
 
The only thing i said -
"There are companies or people that change a bit of timing in the low end. Try to sell run more octane and get more torque. Or claim this bosch ecu is more advanced than an auto world. Or has 100 maps for fuel alone. LMAO. Funny stuff"

If you say stuff on a public forum thats not true or is funny. I am going to laugh or I am going to call it. So be it. Not my fault. What I said was true as dirt. There are companies or people like that. There is also a handful of companies/people that are very good at what they do. I didn't say you or your company. I didn't say you fit in either category. Your the one who took offence.

Thats the problem. There is a whole bunch of companies or people tuning different ecu's. And very very few that actually should be.
Everybody and there brother can buy equipment with money. Doesn't mean they understand it or know what they are doing. Maybe be trial and error they find some sort of gain.

People have minds of there own and can make there own assumptions with regards to what company they would want to do business with. Thats all I have to say about that.

As for my goals - you better believe that I strive to be the best. I dissect code, find maps, parameters, new model ecu's, test stuff, blow up engines, find engine limits, limitations and learn on a monthly basis. I am not narrow minded and learning never stops. I am proud to admit that there are very few that are the same.
 
Jase,
As an independent party, I didn't read Spyd Piper's post as a bag of you, but I can see why you have thought it was, taken offence and responded "in kind". I wouldn't like to see either of you take your bat and ball and go home, as you both have so much to offer. I really appreciate what you are doing here:thumbup:

Pete
 
very interrested

i am looking at getting this done soon i got a price for a new module but am not sure if you need to do trans module also
 
i am looking at getting this done soon i got a price for a new module but am not sure if you need to do trans module also

No. Engine mapping is only done in the main ecu.

Future options may be available using the trans ecu. But this would be non engine related and only about gearing changes or YAW / angle sensors etc. At this time, only engine mapping is available.

NOTE: You can't just buy and send a new ecu. The ecu needs to be mated to the bike. It is mated to VIN, Model, Variant, DESS Keys, Dash, DPS power steering unit, air ride and holds bike specific information for device learns etc. And this need to be done BEFORE remapping. Ecu needs to be initialized.

You can buy an ecu and have anybody with BUDS initialize and set it up to your bike. Then send. Otherwise, don't buy a new ecu and send in yours with quick turn around options.
 
It is called a Catalytic Converter

As is usually the case with me, think my choices might be a bit different but please comment if I have not chosen wisely. This is all about learning....

Bits of information on lingo in Spydeeland for Spyd_Piper, on all 1330 equipped Spyders, there is a catalytic converter inside the primary muffler under the bike as its shipped from BRP. The typical way of getting rid of it is by installing a primary muffler bypass pipe. There is no part on the diagrams or service manuals referred to as a catalytic converter.

Here you go it is called a cat......

attachment.php
 
So it is. Older versions of the service manuals and parts diagrams all called it the primary muffler. Guess they changed.

No matter really. Was really just trying to help with lingo here on the forum for someone that was trying to come up to speed. Call it what ever you want. To me, its still a primary muffler.
 
complied more info

I wanted to share some ULTRA low end test results. This should help the RT or F3 owners who have the higher gearing like my RT. I'm still trying to wrap my head around about how an F3 with a 13% difference in gearing will respond to the flash. With my new data it might provide some insight for what to expect. The following data is more for the owner who just wants to shift less and have improved power for two up passing. With my flash I shift less often now and work 4th and 5th gear much more. If someone can run these test on a stock machine I would love to have the results. Shouldn't get a speeding ticket with this test.

5th gear: 3,000 to 4,000 rpm, 100% throttle, starts at 50 mph ends at 67 mph in about 6 seconds
4th gear: 3,000 to 4,000 rpm, 100% throttle, starts at 42 mph ends at 58 mph in about 5 seconds
3rd gear: 3,000 to 4,000 rpm, 100% throttle, starts at 36 mph ends at 52 mph in about 3 seconds
2nd gear: 2,000 to 4,000 rpm, 100% throttle, starts at 20 mph ends at 40 mph in about 3 seconds
1st gear: 2,000 to red line 8,800 rpm, 100% throttle, starts at 15 mph to 65 mph in about 6 seconds.

It was hard for me to read the top speed in 1st gear as there was a sling shot effect after the rev limiter. I saw top readings as high as 67 after the rev limiter kicked in.
 
power commander

two questions i notice there is no change with the first 60% THROTTLE why power commander is the same.
 
two questions i notice there is no change with the first 60% THROTTLE why power commander is the same.


Closed loop.
This is Emission based logic. There is a factory narrowband oxygen sensor in the exhaust which feeds back a signals to ecu which indicates where the stoich switch point it. 14.7 AFR.

The factory system will continuously try to keep fuel targeted to achieve this at idle and low / lights loads. Good for emissions. Not so much for Performance or gas milage, But milage is decent enough and who needs performance at lighter throttle poisons. Just open it up more. So no need to change. Also, there is no issue then with emission laws or test failures when left alone.

Fuel tuners like Power Commander can't adjust it. The factory system keeps counteracting any adjustment. To the point where a fault code will set. So by not adjusting / locking out. It is allowed in California and can be used all elsewhere without issue.
 
Is there an advantage over my 998 twin with modified exhaust and two brothers racing juice pack? In running about 126 hp now and I would like a safe and sound 150 with no speed limiter. I can run 91 or 93 octane now but with the fuel controller it dumps fuel and stinks too much.
 
126 HP

Is there an advantage over my 998 twin with modified exhaust and two brothers racing juice pack? In running about 126 hp now and I would like a safe and sound 150 with no speed limiter. I can run 91 or 93 octane now but with the fuel controller it dumps fuel and stinks too much.
I seriously doubt that number ...... The Spyders are computer controlled and won't allow that kind of HP increase ..... unless the computer program ( ECU ) is modified ...... Did you have a Dyno test to verify your HP figure ????? ................. Mike :thumbup:
 
Back
Top