The spyder would eat it. Seriously.. we've had this discussion many times before.
With out electrical or hydraulic assist, a leaning reverse trike takes too much energy to transition from a left or right lean to the other. With one wheel up front like many of the leaning trike like vehicles the geometry makes the physics work... Reverse the wheel pattern and physics works against you.
I'm not saying that the linked trike wouldn't be fun to ride, but I think the Spyder is much more refined and better performing with the A arms up front and a non leaning design. I'd totally love it if they made one that leans with a technical assist... but I'm not sure many of us could afford that model.
Heres a much more detailed brief than I believe we have seen so far on the Bombardier product.
http://www.google.com/patents?id=sA...D0Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=leaning vehicle&f=false
Still no comment on a production bike, but goes into a bit more detail than just "protection" I think.
Ooooh.... I was about to scoff at yet another link to that single years-old patent drawing we've all seen before, but with PLENTY of drawings filed just this past January, this was genuinely new to me.
Hmmmm...opcorn:
check out the Ducati 620 Monstrosity..to add to the collections. Still even if they got one to work well it would better fit the category of a bike with all it's same knee scraping foot crunching shoulder banging qualities. Imo roadster remain in a category of their own..!!hyea:
Piaggio mp3
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13641_3-9892882-44.html
Not sure what the problem is? If they rock a 500cc scooter I'm sure we could make the spyder work... But isn't the "flat" non leaning feel what has helped bring in many spyderlovers who may have never set foot in the motorcycle world otherwise?
While we're talking alternatives, here's one a little bit different. Same principle as the Segway, but cuter!