The OP didn't complain about the dealer, he was/is upset about-
1. an apparent or perceived lack of standardization to the pulley replacement and associated costs processes
2. BRP's & Carlo's lack of acknowledgment to his dissatisfaction
Without pulling the manual out, I do recall reading somewhere that BRP recommends replacing both pulleys and the drive belt when any 1 of the 3 components is replaced. I don't believe the original servicing dealer is that far off base to be labeled 'bad news' or 'the major fly in the ointment', unless of course someone has first hand knowledge of the dealer and the incident in question.....How is it that someone can determine so readily it's the dealer that's 'sticking it to the customer'?.........
I think BRP and Carlo are 'sticking it to the customer', after all, they are the ones that the customer can't seem to get a hold of for clarification ..........
I just thought I would clarify my feelings about where the problems are:
1) When I found out that BRP would not warrantee this work I immediately tried to Carlo and got no response from messages I left on his voice mail nor from emails after weeks of trying to get him to respond. Then when he did respond finally when I was not at home he told my wife he had been trying to call us but could never get us. No message was ever left on my voice mail on the home phone and none on my cell phone. Caller ID never showed any number from him on either phone. . My wife told him that she wanted him to call my cell phone and he said that he would as soon as he hung up from talking to her....he never did! I also never received any emails from him. I do not like being ignored and/or, dare I say it, lied to!
2) Upon checking with others that had similar work done, I found out that I was the only one that had to pay for these repairs and again even though I had the 3 year extended warranty! Since my original post I still am the only one to the best of my knowledge that had to pay out of my own pocket. One person with no warranty at all neither the original nor an extended warranty had his repairs covered and all he paid was .7 of an hour labor.
3) Finding out that this person had only been charged .7 of an hour for labor and I was charged 3.5 hrs and the only thing that was done differently on my Spyder was that they replaced my rear sprocket. I can't believe that replacing the rear sprocket should have taken another 2.8 hrs. Since all of this has been transpiring I confronted the owner of the dealership of this huge difference he said that I complained to the mechanic about rough running and he said that was the difference. The mechanic had previously told me when I picked my up Spyder that he had test drove it for about 20 miles and to quote him " it ran flawlessly" and needed nothing to be done. I don't believe 20 miles of driving in the country should have taken 2.8 hrs. By the way I still have the rough running or surging between 3000 and 4000 RPMS.
There seems to be some confusion if I had an extended warranty, which I have just stated I do. I guess it wasn't clear when I was talking about how the other dealers would have only charged me the $50 deductible, that I did indeed have the extended warranty.
Another question came up about how many miles I had on it when this work was done, I had 33,000 miles on my Spyder at that point and now have over 36000 miles.
Another statement was made that if one sprocket has to be changed then the other sprocket and belt should be replaced to prevent "premature wearing out" of the new sprocket. I did a little cost analysis and figured that if I had to have this work done every 33,000 miles and both sprockets and belt were changed again at 66,000 miles it would have cost me $2030 at this mileage interval (using what it cost me this time as the constant). On the other hand if only the front sprocket was changed which is the only one that I feel really needed it at the 33,000 mile interval, it would have cost around $50 for the cost of that sprocket and .7 of an hour labor which is a little more than what BRP figures the flat rate should be and if you figure $80 an hour labor rate then the cost would have only been $106 for the part and labor. Then if you figure with "premature wear" I had to have the work done again at say 48,000 miles which would be only 15000 miles on the new front sprocket and I paid to have everything replaced(both sprockets and a new belt) at the same cost as I did this time paying $1015 (with what I believe is an inflated labor rate) then it still would have only cost me at the 48,000 mile interval $1121 and now all things being equal I am good for another 33,000 miles which would put me at 78,000 miles before I had to have another new front sprocket replaced. To me it is simple economics to only change what needs to be changed instead of changing all components every time.
I hope this wasn't too long to follow my reasoning. Even if you figure at a more reaonable labor rate of 2 hrs. @ $80 an hr. to change both sprockets and the belt I would still come out hundreds of dollars ahead by replacing only what needs to be replaced.
I tried to take a ride on my Spyder a couple of days ago and I was still so upset and outraged at all of this I just could not ride and felt very bitter and disgusted with this whole ordeal and felt like I would never enjoy riding it again. Today my wife and I took a ride and stopped to get something to eat and people came up to us asking questions about our Spyder, as people always do and to my amazement I still feel really good about owning the Spyder and answered all of their questions with almost the same enthusiasm that I did before all of this trouble began. The Spyder really is a great machine and is and will be part of our life in the future. I still feel that BRP customer service and their reps let us down and ignored us in the situation we find our selves with this dealer. To think that if I had gone to either other dealer...we would have only paid $50 and been covered under our extended warranty and saved over $950 sickens me. It just seems that BRP should have some kind of better standardization of what is covered and /or what is not. Instead, because I chose the wrong dealer in good faith that I would be dealt with fairly like the other people have been at other dealers, I have to pay dearly for that choice!!
Please excuse me for my long windedness......and thanks to all for all of the input into this matter.
Happy Spydering to all!!