Lew L
Well-known member
Poseidon, most Spyder owners are too old to want more power.
Glad you said "most". I keep a V-max around for just a little excitement. At 70 yrs old---- V-boost is a real kick.
Lew L
Last edited:
Poseidon, most Spyder owners are too old to want more power.
:agree: And, use the correct spelling of the engine ...Rotax
:clap::roflblack:U R Krazy:2thumbs:If u want two folow me arround corecting mi speling, punktuation, n gramar, u r goin too b verry bussy! :thumbup:
Poseidon, most Spyder owners are too old to want more power.
That is the number one reason why BRP or the aftermarket needs to step up and find ways (like giving the Spyder more power) to draw the younger crowd to it. It is a fun machine to ride. It would be more fun with more power and even better handling! Younger generations are not riding bikes (2 or 3 wheel) in the numbers that previous generations did at their age. If something doesn't change, there are going to be fewer and fewer riders buying fewer bikes. More models are going to be dropped from production, and more manufacturers are going to close their doors or move on to making different products to stay in business.
The first two companies I see to experience this will be Harley Davidson and the Spyder branch of BRP as they both tend to have the oldest population of customers compared to other manufacturers. I think Honda understands that this is happening. They brought out the new Gold Wing that is slimmer, lighter, with better performance and handling, and a lot more tech built in. They still are not going to draw many 20 year olds, but they are a lot more likely to draw in some customers in their 30's and 40's vs being the "old man bike" that they use to be. It is definitely a step in the right direction!
You are obviously not familiar with corporate America. Before you point it out, I know BRP is a Canadian company. I really don't think any big corporation has said "we are big enough, we don't need anymore customers"... EVER!!!!Spyder's niche market is big enough without going after the nut-jobs.
I cannot imagine that BRP's plan is to NOT grow their market. That's how they satisfy their investors. That's how business works. That's how everything works. When it doesn't grow it's either a sign that somethings wrong, end of product life, or market saturation. Two things we can all agree on: The Spyder market is NOT saturated AND it's definitely NOT an obsolete product!
Caution & risk (liability): I suspect that's what is holding them back.... They're taking "baby steps." Allowing drivers to disable the nanny's anti-slip was one of them. Unfortunately in an SE (mine anyways) doing so makes very little (if any) difference with good sticky tires. I still don't know why it's not possible to change sprockets. Seems like everything else is reporting back via wheel spin speeds. All that would sacrifice is a touch of top end. And for those of us who don't care about going 120 (let alone 90 - not in this for tickets lol/col.)......
FWIW: Gearing change (sprockets) seems plausible regardless of any associated "fly by wire" control system issues. ~ Because the aftermarket companies are now beginning to remap the ECM's.
I wouldn't mind a bit more power. I ride two up with a trailer and it struggles with headwinds and hills.
These are two VERY good reasons of why the 1330 RT's could and should have the option of using the 89 tooth rear sprocket. So far, and as far as I know, No one has been successful with this change. I read only one post where one RT owner tried making it work without success. This individual was going to give this a second trail but they would never answer my PM's. Go here and read posts by GM=tech and others. http://www.spyderlovers.com/forums/showthread.php?76257-F3-89-tooth-rear-sprocket/page2)
(I have been in contact with both of the ECM tuners and they both would like to get this working. I am willing to buy the parts and put the time and effort in this fix over the winter months and hopefully get it working. It would be really nice if BRP would step up with a belt, pulley kit and a reflash that would allow this to happen. Hopefully the aftermarket can crack this nut. I think this would be a very popular option for the RT's owners riding 2 up, pulling a trailer and riding mountain twisty roads. larryd
I wonder if BUDS MegaTech will allow the changes and / or disabling the Nanny? I know it allows it on the off road side with ATVs and SxSs.
http://www.brpdiagnostics.com/brpbudsmegatechlicencekey/
I am not spending $350 for only 25 ponies. I think most are fine just the way the Spyder is for now. JMO :shocked:
Now change the pricing and MAYBE you will get more people to take the Pony plunge .
I am not spending $350 for only 25 ponies. I think most are fine just the way the Spyder is for now. JMO :shocked:
Now change the pricing and MAYBE you will get more people to take the Pony plunge .
So, unless I'm not understanding your post correctly, splicing the sensors to allow a dyno run is just a theory. If that is the case, how do they know the flash is increasing hp and torque? One or the other has to be incorrect. Either they know how and have had it on the dyno, or they don't know how much gains to expect. Maybe their butt dyno is more sensitive than mine.I learned From Monster fuel one way to get around the gearing change the nanny won't allow. Something about splicing the sensor cable from the rear tire and tying it in with a front wheel sensor. They were doing this to be able to run the bike on a Dyno. This would tell the ECU all three tires are spinning equal and allow any gearing change. The fuel mapping is identical for the 89 or the 79 tooth sprocket but you would loose traction control and abs for the rear wheel as it is blinded. Only a theory I was told, but it makes sense??
Right now monster fuel has a Daytona test bike and is working on a complete package turbo kit. Basically taking parts off of other BRP product lines and fitting them to the Can-Am. I was told that their ECU flashes which are netting about 25 ponies aren't really selling as hoped for. This is having a domino effect on funding for the turbo project. Seems Can-Am owners talk the performance talk but don't walk the performance walk even though there is 25 ponies for $350 with the ECU flash.
Just in case people have missed it, here is a video of my test RT going from 0 to 68 mph, laying down about 25' of rubber in under 6 seconds. A Stock RT is only going 50 mph in the same time and distance. My NEW F3L hauls but with the flash but it took an exhaust change to get the results.
https://monsterfuelinjection.com/spyder/
I am always looking for more power. And adding 20%+ more horsepower to a $25k+ machine for only $350 is a real bargain (If the gains are true). I come from (and still am) the ford performance family (numerous mustangs, including my roush and my ford lightning), and there are no gains to be had in that way (percentage wise), without going to nitrous. Which, is the one thing that I have never heard anyone mention in the spyder world.I am not spending $350 for only 25 ponies. I think most are fine just the way the Spyder is for now. JMO :shocked:
Now change the pricing and MAYBE you will get more people to take the Pony plunge .
Even a bargain is only a bargain when it has been tried and proven. I am never one to have to (or want to) be the first guy on the block to try something.Since some of you think its a bargain why not jump on this great deal and performance upgrade then:dontknow:
Poseidon, most Spyder owners are too old to want more power.