Of course I'm interested... it's fun!
I see it mentioned above, but nobody appears to have ridden a Piaggio MP3. Same concept, works fine, feels much like any other scooter while riding. Wheels are narrow enough that you *can* drop it, but the two wheels up front do preclude much of the risk of washing out from gravel in a turn or front braking leaned over.
Setting the wheels on your reverse tilting trike even wider, like that bike in the photo at the top, or as wide as the Spyder's, and you're faced with even less risk. Honestly, I don't see how a Spyder-sized reverse tilting trike is any less safe or harder to operate than a Spyder. If anything, from a physics perspective it's safer, as you won't need a Nanny trying to keep a rigid trike planted.
I'm not sure BRP will ever put out a leaning Spyder. Yeah, they patented it, big whup- everybody patents everything, just as often to preclude someone else from building to that design versus building it yourself.
I just think that if BRP had the idea to build a leaner, they would have done it by now. Trouble is, as I've written here before, the moment they put one out with a similar level of polish to the current Spyder lineup, it'll cannibalize the existing designs something fierce. Yes, there are people (some in this thread) who have no interest in a leaning trike, but I'd venture that BRP would ultimately sell far, far more leaning trikes than rigid trikes if they get the formula right.
It's a chicken-and-the-egg deal: some Spyder riders, understandably defensive about their unique machine, swear that they have no interest in a leaning trike. Well, it's easy to say you don't want one *when there isn't one*. Once there is? Same fit, finish, polish, safety, but the perk of feeling that lean in the twisties? Might as well print your own money at that point.
I love my Spyder. I love the "go kart" feeling. It's like nothing else on the road. But just because I love chocolate doesn't mean I don't love vanilla, too. I contain multitudes. :doorag: