• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Windshield decision

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's a man worth millions doing buying a second-hand windshield, then calling the manufacturer about a possible "defect". Yes, maybe Marcel should have called you as a courtesy, but he didn't. Seems like the implication here is that you are saying the windshield was sold with the defect to the first owner and you want some satisfaction. Maybe what you should have done is call the person you bought it from. Used is used, I can't see what is so hard to understand about that. If you buy a used Ford from someone, and after a few days you find that the wipers don't work, are you going to call Ford Motor Company and demand to be made whole? I don't think so...

Why do people always have to discuss an individuals personal wealth when it comes to a disagreement? The implication was simply created by some peoples assumptions and we all know what happens when you assume. At the very least Marcel could have responded with an explanation that he couldn't do anything about the shield and that would have been that. Instead poor customer service seems to be accepted by so many, sure there are people who have gotten good service from him and love his product and then there are others that could care less for him, his product, and the way he does business. And those people are also entitled to their opinions. Not to mention that fact that it is not unreasonable for a 2nd owner of one of these products to inquire as to whether or not there is a warranty that would transfer. And yes if I bought a used Ford and something went wrong I would at least see if the warranty was still in affect before I paid to have it fixed.
 
CalSci windshield material correction

Regarding ataDude's comment yesterday "...so far the only three polycarbonate shields that I have come up with are the CalSci, CHAD and National Cycle..."

I wrote to CalSci and Mark Lawrence's reply was "We don't use polycarbonate, we use acrylic".

Are the BRP windshields polycarbonate or acrylic?
 
Regarding ataDude's comment yesterday "...so far the only three polycarbonate shields that I have come up with are the CalSci, CHAD and National Cycle..."

I wrote to CalSci and Mark Lawrence's reply was "We don't use polycarbonate, we use acrylic".

Are the BRP windshields polycarbonate or acrylic?


Not all acrylics are created equal. What you see in the previously posted video is not the grade generally used in the motorcycle windshield aftermarket, IMO. The video is a sales tool, so take it for what it's worth. CeeBaileys makes windshields for several applications including aircraft. I believe they use an impact resistent, DOT approved grade of acrylic...not lexan. Maybe ataDude has checked their stuff and could comment here.

Keep in mind that polycarbonate is much softer, scratches very easily and has other drawbacks when used in a windshield application.
 
Not all acrylics are created equal. ... The video is a sales tool, so take it for what it's worth.

True, Marcel did have a sales video out on his EVO III and slider where he drove over them with a van, flexing the heck out of them, and they did not break. Seems like each material can have its drawbacks and its advantages.
 
True, Marcel did have a sales video out on his EVO III and slider where he drove over them with a van, flexing the heck out of them, and they did not break. Seems like each material can have its drawbacks and its advantages.


It's been a while but...

I believe Poly is actually illegal for use in auto windshields. When it does break it doesn't "blow apart". Put your head through a glass windshield and there will be a head sized hole left. With poly, no hole, just a big, very sharp and jagged crack that has now convieniently closed back down around your throat.

Like you said it's a trade off all the way around.
 
Why do people always have to discuss an individuals personal wealth when it comes to a disagreement? The implication was simply created by some peoples assumptions and we all know what happens when you assume. At the very least Marcel could have responded with an explanation that he couldn't do anything about the shield and that would have been that. Instead poor customer service seems to be accepted by so many, sure there are people who have gotten good service from him and love his product and then there are others that could care less for him, his product, and the way he does business. And those people are also entitled to their opinions. Not to mention that fact that it is not unreasonable for a 2nd owner of one of these products to inquire as to whether or not there is a warranty that would transfer. And yes if I bought a used Ford and something went wrong I would at least see if the warranty was still in affect before I paid to have it fixed.

He brought up the mention of his weath, like it carried more weight for his complaint. IMHO this thread should never have been started. Seems like just another negative thread against Marcel. I am sure he has had more satisfied, than dissatisfied customers or he would not be in business anymore. This whole thing seems to have started with the assumption, or declared fact that the shield was defective from the get-go. I don't think it was, because it would never had been shipped to the first owner. This is just something that should have been handled off this forum, except that someone just wanted to vent the hurt to his pride because Marcel never returned his call.
 
I believe he only mentioned his money so that people would understand he's not some cheapskate looking for freebies.

And whoever posted about him 'buying used' when he has millions --- perhaps that is why he has millions ;) !

So it appears you can get an Arcryllic DOT certified.

I think it would be important to know which ones are actually DOT certified and which are not.
 
He brought up the mention of his weath, like it carried more weight for his complaint. IMHO this thread should never have been started. Seems like just another negative thread against Marcel. I am sure he has had more satisfied, than dissatisfied customers or he would not be in business anymore. This whole thing seems to have started with the assumption, or declared fact that the shield was defective from the get-go. I don't think it was, because it would never had been shipped to the first owner. This is just something that should have been handled off this forum, except that someone just wanted to vent the hurt to his pride because Marcel never returned his call.

It's not undeniable to think that a defective shield could have gotten shipped to the original owner. And the thread wasn't started as a negative thread towards Marcel, but why shouldn't we allow someone to provide us feedback about his experiences with Marcel. It's not the first negative remark I've heard and maybe it won't be the last. When I had my HD I used to buy parts from Zanotti's all the time, they gave 20% discounts and shipping was always fast. Now while I never had a problem with them I read others remarks on the HD forums that their experiences with them were not as good. It never lead me to make assumptions about the individual posting the comments. Customer service a lot of time is affected by perception.
 
Why do people always have to discuss an individuals personal wealth when it comes to a disagreement? The implication was simply created by some peoples assumptions and we all know what happens when you assume. At the very least Marcel could have responded with an explanation that he couldn't do anything about the shield and that would have been that. Instead poor customer service seems to be accepted by so many, sure there are people who have gotten good service from him and love his product and then there are others that could care less for him, his product, and the way he does business. And those people are also entitled to their opinions. Not to mention that fact that it is not unreasonable for a 2nd owner of one of these products to inquire as to whether or not there is a warranty that would transfer. And yes if I bought a used Ford and something went wrong I would at least see if the warranty was still in affect before I paid to have it fixed.

That's funny...usually the richest are the most miserly...that's how they get that way! Smart...

I always try to buy things at a discount...doesn't matter what I do or how much (now how little) I make...it's just a good idea to get things at the lowest possible price...but, never at the expense of service.

I'll always pay more if I know the service is good...nothing like being stranded...

In this case, the merchant should respond...this is a case of poor customer service...whether new or used...who cares...stand behind your product or don't sell it!
 
The problem is solved! I don't need a phone call or parts anymore!

The pieces will be in my trash can until Thursday with the rest of the garbage... the big white truck comes on Thursday morning. Come and get it!

picture.php
 
Last edited:
Now that's the way to do it. I took care of a "defective" answering machine the same way. It was only recording messages from a boss, asking me to work on my days off. Funny, after I took care of the defect, no more messages. I know I felt better. LOL
Good for you.
:clap::congrats::clap:
 
Problem solved! I don't need a phone call or parts anymore!

The pieces will be in my garbage until Thursday... that's when the all of the trash is collected. Come and get it!

picture.php

PM me (or post) your "testing" process if you don't mind.
 
They responded in January...no warranty on second or third hand windshields.


They might have said no reverse or exchange in the email but how do they know that atadude couldn't use some parts to fix what he had? They dont because it doesn't seem like Marcel came back, Because he never contacted him like the email said he would do. This to me is Bad/Poor customer service and In my eyes it is even worse because he did get an email from F1 and they never came through with what was stated. Yes there was no exchange or refund but at this point he could have been a NEW CUSTOMER and bought a new shield. I would like to hear both sides of this and there is no reason we shouldnt so why doesnt Marcel's friend go and invite him to come and defend himself, his product, and his customer service policy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top