Which handles better, Spyder or bike?

[Captain Fin]

Pirates

Hahaha......




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Arrrrrg! Did someone say Pirates? I dress like a Pirate everyday.

 

[Neez]

It would depend upon what model of Harley and the skill of the rider. I ride both motorcycles and my Spyder. I found that when my GS SE5 was stock, I would be quicker in the twisties on a bike, due to the Spyder wallowing. After adding aftermarket shocks and swaybar, I am quicker on the Spyder. Others may vary, of course. I would say, if you insist on choosing off the local bikers in the twisties, talk to Elka and Bajaron.

 

[dtkennney]

I do not have a spider yet,but as I close in on 69 I am beginning to think of 3 wheels. Right now I ride a Honda DN-01. When I first got it I got all kinds of comments about it not being a real bike, besides being ugly etc,etc. After discussing issues with other riders. I finally decided on a simple response.

"I love the bike and that is all that matters"

kept the discussions short.

When I eventually get an RT I will say the same thing

 

[Bob Ledford]

every one has an opinion on everything. The real trick is to make them think yours is the better one without turning it into a shouting match. Once it turns into a shouting match it becomes impossible to tell which one is the missing village idiot!

At the end of the day who really gives a big hoot?

 

[Jeriatric]

It would depend upon what model of Harley and the skill of the rider. I ride both motorcycles and my Spyder. I found that when my GS SE5 was stock, I would be quicker in the twisties on a bike, due to the Spyder wallowing. After adding aftermarket shocks and swaybar, I am quicker on the Spyder. Others may vary, of course. I would say, if you insist on choosing off the local bikers in the twisties, talk to Elka and Bajaron.

:agree:

:thumbup::clap:

Put a broomstick in the hands of a pro and they'll beat you at a game of pool almost every time.

 

[Oldmanzues]

I like the Spyder looks. I can afford the Spyder. I like the Spyder ride, so I bought one (two). Obtain what you want/can afford the same way. If you ask me me about the Spyder, I will answer to the best of my ability. If I am interested in your ride, I will ask questions. Never did get in those long ago wars. HD x Indian with that outsider BMW. HD x Royal enfield/Indian x brit bikes. HD x Brit bikes x Hondas and so on. Ride like you what to and have fun. Oldmanzues

 

[Bob Denman]

every one has an opinion on everything. The real trick is to make them think yours is the better one without turning it into a shouting match.

Tact ; The art of telling somebody to go to Hell, and have them looking forward to thd trip... :thumbup:

 

[Spyder Monkey]

Wow, good stuff. I like hanging out here, the maturity level is generally a little higher.

Confirmation bias is a good point. We're all here because we all like Spyders (at least I have not seen any deliberate "trolling" by non-enthusiasts).

In addition to the excellent points raised above, the argument could go on forever because "better handling" is such a vague criteria.

If "better handling" is defined as the minimum time around a dry, clean, race track by professional riders on professionally set up machines, I would put money on a two wheeler over a spyder any day. Not only because of the physical differences but simply because you have thousands of skilled engineers, riders, and mechanics and decades of development going toward making the fastest motorcycle lap times possible.

The Spyder is a niche product that has only existed for less than a decade with less support. And the "nanny" engine management system is fundamentally at odds with absolute performance. The nanny is designed to keep you "stable" and will gladly cut power and apply brakes to help you achieve that goal.

If "better handling" is defined as keeping an average rider from impacting the pavement and other vehicles and objects in real world riding conditions (rain, debris, stupid cagers, animals, off-camber roads, etc), then I would bet on the Spyder hands down.

• You can apply maximum braking without destabilizing the platform. In a motorcycle, the harder you brake, the less you can steer. Motorcycles have a "traction budget" that you have to allocate between steering and braking.
• Hard braking on a motorcycle changes its handling characteristics more drastically. If an obstacle presents itself in mid turn, you have to decide between either aggressive steering or aggressive braking, not both.
• Greater contact patch = more traction
• The Spyder is much less sensitive to road conditions like gravel or "tar snakes" because its contact points with the road are not in line with the direction of travel. If you have ever ridden a motorcycle on a steel grate bridge in the rain or on a road with deep rain grooves, you will know exactly what I mean. There is not much more unsettling than having your motorcycling "walking" in and out of the rain grooves trying to find a stable path.

 

[Rockwall]

Ride what makes you comfortable and happy. It's being in the wind that counts.:doorag:

...and whatever makes others happy is good for them. To bad so many out there don't get that.

 

[NoJive]

Very good points there. One of the things I was taught in the MSF course was if you need to panic brake in a turn, to straighten the bike first. It's a good idea in theory, and in the parking lot it was easy. In reality, if it is a panic stop, I don't think you have time to do anything but brake.

And rain grooves are very nerve wracking on two wheels. I had to drive around 3 miles on a section of road that had just been grooved/graded on the Suzuki I had. Not fun a'tall!

Wow, good stuff. I like hanging out here, the maturity level is generally a little higher.

Confirmation bias is a good point. We're all here because we all like Spyders (at least I have not seen any deliberate "trolling" by non-enthusiasts).

In addition to the excellent points raised above, the argument could go on forever because "better handling" is such a vague criteria.

If "better handling" is defined as the minimum time around a dry, clean, race track by professional riders on professionally set up machines, I would put money on a two wheeler over a spyder any day. Not only because of the physical differences but simply because you have thousands of skilled engineers, riders, and mechanics and decades of development going toward making the fastest motorcycle lap times possible.

The Spyder is a niche product that has only existed for less than a decade with less support. And the "nanny" engine management system is fundamentally at odds with absolute performance. The nanny is designed to keep you "stable" and will gladly cut power and apply brakes to help you achieve that goal.

If "better handling" is defined as keeping an average rider from impacting the pavement and other vehicles and objects in real world riding conditions (rain, debris, stupid cagers, animals, off-camber roads, etc), then I would bet on the Spyder hands down.

• You can apply maximum braking without destabilizing the platform. In a motorcycle, the harder you brake, the less you can steer. Motorcycles have a "traction budget" that you have to allocate between steering and braking.
• Hard braking on a motorcycle changes its handling characteristics more drastically. If an obstacle presents itself in mid turn, you have to decide between either aggressive steering or aggressive braking, not both.
• Greater contact patch = more traction
• The Spyder is much less sensitive to road conditions like gravel or "tar snakes" because its contact points with the road are not in line with the direction of travel. If you have ever ridden a motorcycle on a steel grate bridge in the rain or on a road with deep rain grooves, you will know exactly what I mean. There is not much more unsettling than having your motorcycling "walking" in and out of the rain grooves trying to find a stable path.

 

[ARtraveler]

Sorry, can't stay away from pending controversy. :roflblack:

Totally agree with those that say you can't change the thinking of those who have already made up their minds (?). A lot of times the decision comes without even looking at the pertinent facts.

Everyone can come up with a stack of reasons to justify why their ride (or perceived ride) is the best, and why everyone else is wrong.

Every ride has its pros and cons, and we have pretty much learned to live with the set that accompanies our particular ride(s).

Bob: Keep us posted on that weather for the Fest. :roflblack:

 

[Motorcycledave]

Hard question but....

There are so many types and makes of motorcycles out that answering the
question is tuff, you have to remember there is only one Spyder no matter
if it is an RT,RS,GS,ST it is still the same Spyder with different body work and
doodads there is no way to compare them they are not even close to
being a motorcycle they are in a class of their own... all that said there is no way a
Spyder will ever out handle a motorcycle. A motorcycle is narrower it can split lanes
do enduro, hill climbs, and so much more, there are different bikes for different style
of riding and events. For some people the Spyder is the way to go because of the 3 wheel stance and in some states not needing a motorcycle lic. I do know that for me I like them
both and own both but if I want to get someplace fast I will always take the motorcycle.
everyone have a great time at Spyder Fest
Ride Safe

 

[Tierhog]

I dont necessarily hand it to the 2 wheelers automatically. Maybe its bias on my part, but those heavy bikes (goldwings and HD tanks) look nice but handled like the titanic. The biggest bike I felt nimble on was a honda ST1300 or FJR. But they are more sporty. I like those two bikes... Torn I guess

 

[dave01]

I dont necessarily hand it to the 2 wheelers automatically. Maybe its bias on my part, but those heavy bikes (goldwings and HD tanks) look nice but handled like the titanic. The biggest bike I felt nimble on was a honda ST1300 or FJR. But they are more sporty. I like those two bikes... Torn I guess

Nope, my Goldwing handles great. Not sporty, but it turns and stops much better than my rt did.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Tierhog]

Interesting.. Dont have alot of hours on RTs. Would you rate the goldwings comparable to the RS then? Ive only felt a difference between the FJ, ST, Glydes for comparisons sake. Would like your view as a GW owner...

 

[SXSMachine]

Can't compare them

You just cannot compare the two technologies, they are apples and oranges.

Not only do they have different capabilities they provide a different type of experience as well.

The thing is because they do provide different experiences if you prefer one experience over the other take that experience and go with it, why even try to compare them??

So dont be concerned by others who would argue for the sake of arguing and supposedly being "right" when just expressing something that can be no more justified as just a feeling rather than as a factual representation. :thumbup:

 

[asp125]

Of course, you're talking Spyder vs Harleys. Now if it were Spyder vs sportbike, the tables would be turned in a hurry. But in reality the question would be moot... because of Nanny.

No way can I ride my Spyder in the canyons as fast as I can on my VFR. "Big bird" is just too heavy and wide to flick around corners. Except... on a day where there's sand or rain or reduced traction.. then the Spyder is the preferred ride.

 

[bikeguy]

This is a question that's almost impossible to answer because it is so dependent on the rider. A Spyder should be quicker through the corners than most cruisers simply because the low ground clearance of the cruiser limits the lean angle which limits cornering speed. But a really good rider just might pass a Spyder with an average rider while the foot boards are throwing sparks all over the road. There's no doubt that a good sportbike with a good rider is faster than anything in the corners and that includes almost any production automobile. The rider makes all the difference. Cotton

 

[jerpinoy]

I ended the conversations with a question, Are you happy with your bike? Well I am happy with my Spyder lets ride and have fun:yes:. I have a buddy, riding a HD trike and we talked a lot other than what we ride.

 

[Bob Denman]

:agree: I really like how my RT rides and handles, and my buddy with a Tri-Glide likes his just as much! :2thumbs:
And the weather is Still looking spec-freakin-tacular! :yes::2excited::yes::2excited: