Jack, you do realise that the reason for the original compound change to that soft compound in the first place was due to the number of complaints about the poor grip & handling from the Kenda's don't you? So when BRP changed to a softer compound that got
everyone complaining instead of just
most people, changing back to the original compound didn't fix any of the pre-existing issues!! :yikes:
Great 'customer service' ploy, isn't it?? Market something that generates complaints, then instead of actually
fixing it, just replace it with something even worse!! That way, when you've got enough customer discontent built up about the crappy replacement product, you can go back to the original but still crap product & then customers will sing your praises, won't they?!
Hmmm, there seems to be something wrong in that scenario, but it
is what we've had foisted upon us by BRP re their sub-standard choice of tires!! Alright, maybe no one else stepped up when they originally went to tire manufacturers for a tire & specified a unique size with a limited market potential. Surely, now that there is a lot of practical experience (at customer's risk & expense too) showing that other more common & marketable makes & sizes of tires DO work on the Spyders (& arguably work waaaay better than the Kenda's) it wouldn't be too hard for BRP to stop treating their customers like idiots on this one & 'approve' or endorse some of those alternative makes & sizes of tires?? Or does BRP think we actually
like being treated like idiots??
