Yes and no...The computer does not measure actual power output, so if power can be gained, it will reach the rear wheel. The computer is watching many parameters. Regarding the exhaust, it is a single point O2 sensor which monitors FA ratio. There is no secondary downstream O2 sensor after the convertor. Lacking the second sensor, the computer does not have input data to monitor how well the convertor is reducing emissions from input to output. Therefore, the computer adjusts fuel ratio based of the one probe it monitors, and with this controls the mixture to the intake ports.
Regarding making more power, if the exhaust is more free flowing, AND the computer can retain the preset FA ratio range without faulting, more fuel in will increase power. Unlikely a lot, and doubtful any serius increase at high rpm. It is now common knowledge that the engineers de-rated the power output by limiting throttle opening. Therefore the trick per say, if not getting the computer remapped, is to make stronger power throughout the rpm range. So, having an increase in mid range power, while retaining proper FA ratios, via a free flowing exhaust and air intake is viable. No dyno runs, but our 14 RTS has a stronger pull through the mid range and up to speed. Is it crazy fast, no, but better.
I have always run 93 octane fuel also. The computer will adjust over time to your riding style and often times fuel used. I would need to verify if the Spyder 1330 monitors knock, and if so adjusts timing. Very possibly it does, and if so, will increase timing as needed, which can also greatly improve power, especially mid range.