Tired of looking over my shoulders...

[Lamonster]

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FFBq2T_t5Y"]YouTube- Broadcast Yourself.[/nomedia]

 

[bone crusher]

NO GO...this is the reply I got from the company...

Hi XXXX,

The helmets do not currently carry the DOT certification for the USA therefore we have no representation there yet. They will be certified in the future and we will contact you when the appropriate time comes.

The new pricing structure has not been finalised yet but will be less than the previous £300 GBP. In dollars we will not know until it lands in the States due to local State taxes etc

There will also be an online solution soon for people who wish to purchase before distribution is in place.

Nicola

Reevu
World's First Rear View Helmets
www.reevu.com
+44 (0)191 418 7755

 

[Motza]

They have em on the italian ebay site for 200euros about $312 cdn or $270usd.

cool, can i order one with half pep?

 

[Motza]

Not trying to stir the pot, but how is this better than the mirrors that are already on the bike(and required to remain there)? Besides, how often do cages "zoom" up behind you that you didn't see in the bike's mirrors? Can't recall that happening to me. I am cautious at stop lights already, always scanning the mirrors and flashing my brake lights to avoid a rear-end collision. Wonder what it does for your vision at night if someone behind you has bright lighting?:dontknow: Strikes me as being a distraction.......:doorag:

The stock mirrors on the Spyder are good for dental flossing at a red light, or combing your hair just before you go into that next resturant... Unless you have the extentions on the mirrors, and not your hair. hard to see much. I do admire my shoulders in my Black leather Revitt jacket though. Kind of makes me feel like a biker.
yeah....
what if , just what if your being chased by a helicopter, or alien space ship ( just ask Stuntman, little to late for him he's already been abducted) look whaqts inside his house, or was that AREA 51...
No more a distraction then the mirror in your car, besides it's just cool...
So got have it , want it... you know just like owning the coolest bike on the road...SPYDER :f_spider:

 

[Lamonster]

Not trying to stir the pot, but how is this better than the mirrors that are already on the bike(and required to remain there)? Besides, how often do cages "zoom" up behind you that you didn't see in the bike's mirrors? Can't recall that happening to me. I am cautious at stop lights already, always scanning the mirrors and flashing my brake lights to avoid a rear-end collision. Wonder what it does for your vision at night if someone behind you has bright lighting?:dontknow: Strikes me as being a distraction.......:doorag:

Well I've been rear-ended 4 times now. 3 times in my truck and once on the freeway when I was doing about 65mph on a Honda XL500. That freaked me out for 14 years, that's how long it took me to get back on a street bike.nojoke

 

[Motza]

Well I've been rear-ended 4 times now. 3 times in my truck and once on the freeway when I was doing about 65mph on a Honda XL500. That freaked me out for 14 years, that's how long it took me to get back on a street bike.nojoke

Not to brag ( like Jaws part 1) ... I'm 52 been rear ended 3x but this is while sitting in my car, all of them at a red light. :yikes:

 

[Motza]

I think that faded away.

NOT YET Contact me ... check your incoming messages

 

[Arachnid]

I have to agree with HDXbones here.
The function of the two rear view mirrors on the vehicle is to give both a side rear view and a rear view of approaching traffic from behind. If your mirrors are adjusted correctly (which many aren’t) you simply shift your position slightly to see what is directly behind you. Normally you will be seeing off to the left and right as you drive. Although this gizmo was designed in good faith, I feel it would be more of a distraction than a benefit.
My 2¢
Mike

 

[BajaRon]

Take the rear view mirror out of your car (or just cover it up) and see what you think. You still have the side mirrors, both left and right, just like your Spyder (with the advantage of not wearing a vision restricting helmet).

See how long you can go without that (distractive) center mirror.

 

[spyryder]

The only problem I have with the Spyder mirrors is I can't adjust them outwards far enough.

 

[Roger]

click on their website in the first post then click on motorsports then click on what you see. it looks good. :thumbup:

 

[bone crusher]

The only problem I have with the Spyder mirrors is I can't adjust them outwards far enough.

I added the kewlmetal mirror extensions...a must in my opinion...they really make a big difference...

 

[BajaRon]

The only problem I have with the Spyder mirrors is I can't adjust them outwards far enough.

You need the Kewl Metal extension kit. Solves all your mirror problems. Great improvement. Puts them right where you want them.

 

[Motza]

I have to agree with HDXbones here.
The function of the two rear view mirrors on the vehicle is to give both a side rear view and a rear view of approaching traffic from behind. If your mirrors are adjusted correctly (which many aren’t) you simply shift your position slightly to see what is directly behind you. Normally you will be seeing off to the left and right as you drive. Although this gizmo was designed in good faith, I feel it would be more of a distraction than a benefit.
My 2¢
Mike

Check it out: http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2005/11/21/reevu-rearview-motorcycle-helmet

 

[Recluze]

After looking at Lamonster's posted video I can make out what they are doing-barely.

Not a bad idea but my first thought is: Do I want some mirrors around my skull when I land on my head? If that can be surmounted it could be a helpful idea. I still think I will go with the rear view camera.

I do have a problem with things sneaking up on me. I think it is because I ride on secondary roads away from traffic where I have the road to myself -until I don't. Sometimes I get surprised. Yeah I know that is my fault.

Certainly the Kewl metal extensions are the best thing for solving this problem. Of the few things BRP got wrong- the location of the mirrors was one. Luckily it is easily fixed. I suspect that BRP will fix this problem in future models.

 

[BajaRon]

After looking at Lamonster's posted video I can make out what they are doing-barely.

Not a bad idea but my first thought is: Do I want some mirrors around my skull when I land on my head? .

They aren't glass mirrors, It is a thin, highly polished stainless steel plate. I don't think this is going to give anyone a problem in a crash.

One of the few complaints I've heard about this helmet is the added weight (though not that much). Problem is, the weight is in the worst spot, the top of the helmet.

A camera would certainly add much more weight to the helmet than this design (not to mention cost). Ok, maybe, for short trips, but not good for a long haul.

Certainly the Kewl metal extensions are the best thing for solving this problem. Of the few things BRP got wrong- the location of the mirrors was one. Luckily it is easily fixed. I suspect that BRP will fix this problem in future models.

I don't think this "Fix" is likely to show up on future Spyders. BRP knew full well that these mirrors were a problem from the start. They tried to put them where they needed to be but our illustrious, all knowing government pencil pushers would not allow it.

Seems there is a maximum mirror stalk lenght in the US. This limited BRP to the current design.

Of course you would think our ever vidulent government would take into consideration mundane things like SAFETY. But I guess not.

There is a process by which a manufacturer can apply for a variance (in this case a stalk about 2" longer). BRP began this process long before the Spyder was released.

But they discovered that not only is the process LONG and VERY EXPENSIVE, but the outcome was far from certain. So, after all the time and effort it was likely that the US government agency in charge would say NO anyway.

I think BRP realized that someone like Kewl Metal would come up with a fix. Isn't it amazing that BRP engineers can't get permission to do the mirrors right, but there is no government restriction against the Good Old Boys at Kewl Metal doing exactly that?

Not to take anything away from Big Joe or Matt. They are great guys making great stuff. It's just the stupid way we have to arrive at a solution. (not that the Kewl Metal guys are complaining)

 

[Motza]

They aren't glass mirrors, It is a thin, highly polished stainless steel plate. I don't think this is going to give anyone a problem in a crash.

One of the few complaints I've heard about this helmet is the added weight (though not that much). Problem is, the weight is in the worst spot, the top of the helmet.

A camera would certainly add much more weight to the helmet than this design (not to mention cost). Ok, maybe, for short trips, but not good for a long haul.



I don't think this "Fix" is likely to show up on future Spyders. BRP knew full well that these mirrors were a problem from the start. They tried to put them where they needed to be but our illustrious, all knowing government pencil pushers would not allow it.

Seems there is a maximum mirror stalk lenght in the US. This limited BRP to the current design.

Of course you would think our ever vidulent government would take into consideration mundane things like SAFETY. But I guess not.

There is a process by which a manufacturer can apply for a variance (in this case a stalk about 2" longer). BRP began this process long before the Spyder was released.

But they discovered that not only is the process LONG and VERY EXPENSIVE, but the outcome was far from certain. So, after all the time and effort it was likely that the US government agency in charge would say NO anyway.

I think BRP realized that someone like Kewl Metal would come up with a fix. Isn't it amazing that BRP engineers can't get permission to do the mirrors right, but there is no government restriction against the Good Old Boys at Kewl Metal doing exactly that?

Not to take anything away from Big Joe or Matt. They are great guys making great stuff. It's just the stupid way we have to arrive at a solution. (not that the Kewl Metal guys are complaining)

WELL SPOKEN :agree:

 

[irish2themax]

From The Kneeslider:

The patented multiple mirror system that is fitted within every Reevu helmet is a unique achievement of creative thinking and technical excellence. The mirror system is manufactured from a reflective polycarbonate material rather than glass. Unlike glass, this material is almost impossible to break and is lighter, providing additional safety and comfort to the wearer.

 

[Bimjo]

Take the rear view mirror out of your car (or just cover it up) and see what you think. You still have the side mirrors, both left and right, just like your Spyder (with the advantage of not wearing a vision restricting helmet).

See how long you can go without that (distractive) center mirror.

Well 18 wheeler drivers have been doing it for decades...

If the rear view mirror in my truck blocked the top 15-25% of my field of view and moved whenever I moved my head I might agree with you. I have to think that the constantly changing upper part of the field of view whenever you move your head has to be incredibly distracting.

Maybe it's just me though. :dontknow:

 

[Arachnid]

Take the rear view mirror out of your car (or just cover it up) and see what you think. You still have the side mirrors, both left and right, just like your Spyder (with the advantage of not wearing a vision restricting helmet).

See how long you can go without that (distractive) center mirror.

:chill: Not a factor Spider - much narrower. Mirrors much closer together.

Mike