• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

The latest MSF study of motorcycle crashes


The primary Incident Type for the 30 crashes is summarized in Table 2. The most common case was a ground impact at low speed, which is defined more fully in the data dictionary as “…two-wheeled vehicle falls coincident with low or no speed (even if in gear), due to issue not defined in other Incident Type categories. The rider allows the bike to lean while it is being stopped, just beginning to move from a stop, or making a turn at low speed. Vehicle upright stability is lost due to lack of input by the rider to counteract the effect of gravity.” (Williams, McLaughlin, Williams, and Buche, 2015).The low-speed (“capsize”) crashes are a unique dataset that is not found in traditional crash studies. Though they occur at low (or negligible) speed, they are events that are important to riders. They also have the potential to reveal a breakdown in rider task execution, baseline proficiency, or a temporary reduction in readiness to ride (e.g., fatigue and attention) that could result in problems during a continued ride. These low-speed “crashes” appear to be relatively typical among everyday riding, and are included in the risk analysis. They are events that riders want to avoid, and their analysis provides a basis for continued exploration and categorization of all motorcycle incidents.
 
THAT MOTORCYCLE ACC. REPORT

Very good info .... but Mostly applies to TWO wheel Mtc's ....... unfortunately the Insurance companies use studies like this to increase OUR rates, even tho they are LESS than valid for Spyder's...... jmho .... Mike :thumbup:
 
Very good info .... but Mostly applies to TWO wheel Mtc's ....... unfortunately the Insurance companies use studies like this to increase OUR rates, even tho they are LESS than valid for Spyder's...... jmho .... Mike :thumbup:

I dunno - you'd have to ask Denman about insurance company practices. But, it does reinforce the idea that Spyders are WAY more stable at lower speeds, and therefore safer than 2-wheelers.
 
Last edited:
The primary Incident Type for the 30 crashes is summarized in Table 2. The most common case was a ground impact at low speed, which is defined more fully in the data dictionary as “…two-wheeled vehicle falls coincident with low or no speed (even if in gear), due to issue not defined in other Incident Type categories. The rider allows the bike to lean while it is being stopped, just beginning to move from a stop, or making a turn at low speed. Vehicle upright stability is lost due to lack of input by the rider to counteract the effect of gravity.” (Williams, McLaughlin, Williams, and Buche, 2015).The low-speed (“capsize”) crashes are a unique dataset that is not found in traditional crash studies. Though they occur at low (or negligible) speed, they are events that are important to riders. They also have the potential to reveal a breakdown in rider task execution, baseline proficiency, or a temporary reduction in readiness to ride (e.g., fatigue and attention) that could result in problems during a continued ride. These low-speed “crashes” appear to be relatively typical among everyday riding, and are included in the risk analysis. They are events that riders want to avoid, and their analysis provides a basis for continued exploration and categorization of all motorcycle incidents.


This sounds suspiciously like the "Dammit, I dropped my bike" issue.....which of course has NEVER happened to me (where is the Liar Liar Pants on Fire emoji? ;))
 
This sounds suspiciously like the "Dammit, I dropped my bike" issue.....which of course has NEVER happened to me (where is the Liar Liar Pants on Fire emoji? ;))

Kinda hard to drop a Spyder. I've never done it.;) But, I will admit to dropping my 2-wheeler, in the hotel parking lot, at the end of a 12-hour riding day.
 
A Spyder is a motorcycle, and the study is valid.
It shows that we are actually our own worst enemies... nojoke

:lecturef_smilie: Pay attention, and slow down!
 
There are some very good lessons to learn from this study,even for us 3 wheelers. Look father down the road, you'll be more prepared. Not doing this was the cause of my first motorcycle crash in 50 years of riding. ABS is not a cure for bad habits. Your bike wont stop on a dime and give you 9cents change. Right turns are dangerous also. We concentrate on the left hand turns because of oncoming traffic but there are other dangers in right hand turns.
I would like to see a study that focused on 3 track vehicles as opposed to single track ones. There are getting to be enough trikes out there now of all varieties to warrant such a study and I hope one comes soon.

Thanks for posting this Pete.
 
Kinda hard to drop a Spyder. I've never done it.;) But, I will admit to dropping my 2-wheeler, in the hotel parking lot, at the end of a 12-hour riding day.

Yes, I'm getting to the point where the idea of the "touring bike lifting technique" makes my back hurt even thinking about it....thus the Spyder (among other reasons). :clap:
 
If there was a study on 3 wheeled motorcycles, I would strongly suggest 3 categories.

1. Reverse trikes,--Can am Spyder for example

2. Conventional trikes,--HD tri Glide for example

3. Side car rigs,--The Ural for example

I would also suggest that the rate of accidents are much higher with the conventional trike set up, the main reason 3 wheeled ATV's were discontinued.
 
If there was a study on 3 wheeled motorcycles, I would strongly suggest 3 categories.


  1. Reverse trikes,--Can am Spyder for example
  2. Conventional trikes,--HD tri Glide for example
  3. Side car rigs,--The Ural for example

I would also suggest that the rate of accidents are much higher with the conventional trike set up, the main reason 3 wheeled ATV's were discontinued.

I'd put money on it. This is a great marketing opportunity for Can-Am; I hope they jump all over it.
 
Unfortunately, I doubt that Can Am will bring up the subject. Case in point, the BMW opposed twin motorcycle. It is well known among industry insiders that the cylinders sticking out are the best lower leg/ankle/foot protection of any motorcycle. In any side impact situation or low side your legs are protected, it is almost impossible to knock a BMW cylinder off in a crash. You will never see that fact in an advertisement or published fact sheet.

Lots of reasons for the omission, some Legal and some due to Political Correctness.
 
Kinda hard to drop a Spyder. I've never done it.;) But, I will admit to dropping my 2-wheeler, in the hotel parking lot, at the end of a 12-hour riding day.

And never, NEVER wash your Goldwing wearing flip flops on a smooth concrete driveway.

Just sayin' :lecturef_smilie:

Took several days to find my other testicle.......
 
The cridical time is...........

ANY ONE on a new bike for the first 6 months. :yikes: Prior experience doesn't count. nojoke
 
Kinda hard to drop a Spyder. I've never done it.;) But, I will admit to dropping my 2-wheeler, in the hotel parking lot, at the end of a 12-hour riding day.

I can identify with this. I coulda sworn I'd put the kickstand down... (It was so embarrassing!)
 
Back
Top