bone crusher
Alignment Specialist
+1...huge difference!
-
There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.
Suggestions for BRP on the RS model on the 2012's...
- Thread starter IWN2RYD
- Start date
+1...huge difference!
:agree: I will add the little "extras" that I will actually use and want. Having a more performance platform to start with is an excellent idea. Especially because thats kind of what they are going for in the first place with the RS, IMHO. Better suspension, a little more HP, and a 6th gear would have me trading in my 08...
bone crusher
Alignment Specialist
More horsepower...well, there can never be enough...
However, if your fast accelerations around a turn defeat your VSS, that addition will end up here on the forums with people complaining about them...
The Spyder was never intended to race with sports bikes...it was intended to be a fun sport/crusier bike with a lot more safety involved. Every time I hear of someone dropping their bike, I am grateful I have a Spyder because that cannot happen...however, with more HP comes more danger and if people start zipping around corners too fast, they'll be flying off the road, and this would more than equate to 'dropping the bike'. To me, it's safety first...we can still have tons of fun on our bikes. Traction becomes a bigger issue with more speed around turns...yikes!
I'd start with more comfort (also never enough), standard risers, better 'emergency' brake positioning/function, more stable and functional rear-view mirrors...better belt to reduce vibrations and MORE lights from the get-go.
Heck, BRP could hire ESI to equip all new bikes with HIDs and side lighting, for starters...would be a nice way to go for safety/visibility, and is a much better option than the over-priced BRP HIDs!!
Dochands
Member
More horsepower and all the other good toys that should go with it. Better display. Better brakes. Better suspension.
I would like rearview cameras instead of shaky mirrors.
I don't want to make the RS fat. I want it a lean mean machine.
The RT is the the fat touring bike which is not to say it is not awesome. However, I see it as the Goldwing.
I want the Ducatti. :clap:
I would like rearview cameras instead of shaky mirrors.
I don't want to make the RS fat. I want it a lean mean machine.
The RT is the the fat touring bike which is not to say it is not awesome. However, I see it as the Goldwing.
I want the Ducatti. :clap:
Campverdefela
New member
Like any other manufacturer of motorized vehicles, BRP will probably look at these suggestions and consider what improvements they will make in future models, the ones that most people want might become a reality some day. Keep em coming....
SpyderWolf
New member
Very well stated. :2thumbs:
Arthur---Mexico
New member
Improvments
I used to make jigs and mountings for Ford here in Mexcico. They were for coming models like 5 years in the future. I'm pretty sure that the makers of the Can Am products have a similar lead time. Since there are many interchangable parts in their different year models their lead time might be 3 or 4 years. Don't ever get the idea that because someone, today, expresses the need of certain logical improvements that you would like to see on next year's model. There are too many dies and molds that have to be made plus the engineering. It's a slow and costly process to make a change or new model of anything. It's not like adding one more tooth to the rear sprocket and even that, just a simple thing, requires engineering, molds, and mabe even a new belt. So all we can do is help each other. I make a very effective attachment for easy hand application of the parking brake. But for Can Am to incorporate this item in future Spyders would take them two years. Arthur---Mexcio City, [email protected]
I used to make jigs and mountings for Ford here in Mexcico. They were for coming models like 5 years in the future. I'm pretty sure that the makers of the Can Am products have a similar lead time. Since there are many interchangable parts in their different year models their lead time might be 3 or 4 years. Don't ever get the idea that because someone, today, expresses the need of certain logical improvements that you would like to see on next year's model. There are too many dies and molds that have to be made plus the engineering. It's a slow and costly process to make a change or new model of anything. It's not like adding one more tooth to the rear sprocket and even that, just a simple thing, requires engineering, molds, and mabe even a new belt. So all we can do is help each other. I make a very effective attachment for easy hand application of the parking brake. But for Can Am to incorporate this item in future Spyders would take them two years. Arthur---Mexcio City, [email protected]
Last edited:
I hear you on that, but maybe they could work on the roll factor a little. Maybe implamenting pivoting wheels like on the piaggio mp3 or the dodge tomahawk. Now that would be cool! Give us corning like nobodys business! :thumbup:
WackyDan
New member
They've heard it all before.
I like the no nonsense design of the RS over the RT... I'm perfectly happy to mod it to get it where I want it to be. Pretty much everyone's "want's" in regard to the RS can be done via the aftermarket.... a lot of suggestions will indeed force you to the RT.
I'll partly repeat what I said in another similar thread...
If they are not launching a new design of the RS this year or next, then I'm all for refinement of the existing product. Some factory mods that make sense, etc... But I honestly don't see a new model on the horizon.
The only thing that will make me replace my 08 is a new model design with more power.... and I'll bolt everything else I need on. Let's keep the RS rooted to sporty, simple, and by that nature, affordable.
Bob Denman
New member
Spyder RS-X :2thumbs: Kind of brings a whole new meaning to :spyder2:
You guys have brought forth some really good suggestions... :thumbup:
You guys have brought forth some really good suggestions... :thumbup:
SpydherLuv
New member
Turn signal indicators that actually indicate left or right.
Beefier horn.
Heated grips.
Access to the gas tank without having to lift the seat.
A 6th gear.
HID lights standard equipment.
Beefier horn.
Heated grips.
Access to the gas tank without having to lift the seat.
A 6th gear.
HID lights standard equipment.
A
arntufun
Guest
Do not change anything until these dealers get there service departments more training, parts on there shelfs and turn around times alot faster. Just my 2 cents. :thumbup:
S
spydee owner
Guest
Totally agree.
Here,Here!!! :2thumbs::2thumbs:
3Willie
Member
Hand Brake, Floorboards, Electric Plugs
I have to say the list of requested options has been pretty thorough. The hand brake, floorboards, electric outlets are ones that seem pretty popular.
How about redesigning the heat on the feet issue and exhaust to be more comfortable. Better MPG would seem to be something to accomplish as long as there is a wish list.
I have to say the list of requested options has been pretty thorough. The hand brake, floorboards, electric outlets are ones that seem pretty popular.
How about redesigning the heat on the feet issue and exhaust to be more comfortable. Better MPG would seem to be something to accomplish as long as there is a wish list.
Raptor
New member
The design is getting pretty stale. They do need to refine it a bit and give it a fresher look. Updated lighting along the LED line would be a good thing as well, especially for the back.
For me it's pretty simple, though; more power and mid-range torque, an adjustable Nanny that has a "performance" or "Sport" handling profile, re-vamped suspension and a more reliable driveline. I sure wouldn't frown upon having a sixth gear either!
For me it's pretty simple, though; more power and mid-range torque, an adjustable Nanny that has a "performance" or "Sport" handling profile, re-vamped suspension and a more reliable driveline. I sure wouldn't frown upon having a sixth gear either!
SpyderWolf
New member
Perhaps they would let me help with the placement of the LED designs.
The selectable Nanny would be great as well. :thumbup:
ARtraveler
R.I.P. Dwayne
All great ideas. I do think it is time for some changes in 2012--the design is getting old in the tooth.
Similar threads
