• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Sprocket, red dust and refurb....

PinkRosePetal

New member
Firstly, thanks to you folks on the forum, without you I wouldn‘t have been aware of the front sprocket rusting issue.

This Spyder RT is off on a five week trip soon and it‘s at 16-17k miles on the odometer, right where some of you indicated you had a sprocket spline failure - best check it out and lucky I did.

Below you‘ll find sequential pictures of what was found and the refurbishment sequence, starting with how to remove the belt in less than 10 seconds without dismantling anything; folk don‘t seem to believe this, it‘s too easy. Just keep pulling the top of the belt sideways and rotate the wheel. Refitting, from the bottom, slip the belt onto to the teeth as far as you can then rotate the wheel upwards, 5 seconds only! Oops, I see the pictures have uploaded in reverse order...

Anyway, on with the spline story.
No red dust to be seen so all looked good, put the big C-spanner into the holes of the sprocket to hold it still and the big breaker bar onto the bolt head and prepared to pull hard.... Yikes, the bolt was loose! It screwed out with only the drag of the thread lock compound. The end of the sprocket and the splines were red rusty and the sprocket was unwilling to come off even after working around its edge tapping with a hammer, small puffs of red dust were emitted from the splines on every tap of the hammer. Levering and tapping came to nought. Ooo, not looking good. Best give it a squirt of release oil, let it sit and get the big puller out.

Well, no need, as soon as the oil penetrated (very quickly) the sprocket slipped off with just finger pressure - too weird. As can be seen from the picture, red rust everywhere; so began the clean up. Washed it clean with solvent and used wet or dry paper to clean up the splines and the shaft.

The rear of the sprocket is worn away in the contact area of the shoulder of the shaft and it looks as though this wear releases the clamping pressure of the bolt so the sprocket is free to move on its splines, once that happens moisture gets in and rusting starts in a big way and serious wear begins its destruction. This wear ridge can be seen in the pictures and also there are pictures of the sprocket after refacing the end surfaces ready for refitting. The shoulder on the shaft is very small and provides little contact for the loads it has to support - a bit of a design failure there imho.

The sprocket is made from cast iron and cast iron rusts very readily. It contains free carbon which is released when it is machined and this leaves minute pits in the surface into which moisture settles. The iron, water and carbon make a nice little electric cell so galvanic corrosion sets in rapidly.

I‘m aware that some folks think the red dust is caused by a fretting phenomena, and in some cases perhaps it is but study of the spline pictures shown below indicate little rusting of the pressure surfaces and much rusting of the non-contact surfaces, spline roots, chamfers, shaft end and even inside the shaft bolt clearance hole. I‘ve no doubt that, given time, the whole lot would become nothing more than a rusty mess ready to finally fail, so, with a bit of luck this one is caught in time.

Some things to note:
The shaft is seriously hard, a centre punch nor a file would mark it.
But, the shoulder of the shaft where the sprocket abuts is worn and slightly burred. Hmm...

The depth of the threaded hole was checked to ensure the bolt didn‘t bottom out and give a false torque reading on tightening - it appeared to be OK.

The back of the bolt head was lightly machined to reface it and to check it was true to the shank of the bolt. It was accurate though the hex head was offset somewhat from the centre line of the bolt shank. Poor manufacture but adequate I guess.

The length of the sprocket boss was checked against the shaft spline length to ensure the bolt did not bottom out on the shaft end when tightening. It was very close and a 2mm spacer was made to make up for the material removed when refacing the sprocket boss.
If refitting a sprocket is undertaken, this clearance should be checked carefully since any wear between the sprocket boss and/or the shaft shoulder, as in this case, will allow the sprocket to settle further onto the shaft.

Presuming the bolt had been tightened to the correct torque at manufacture, then that tightening is inadequate since it allows movement of the sprocket on the shaft leading to inevitable failure. There was no point in simply repeating this so the tightening torque was increased to 110lb/ft in the hope that this will be sufficient. Fingers crossed. There is a grade of high tensile bolt with strength in excess of the standard one which would allow a higher tightening torque, it could be a good idea provided the internal thread in the shaft can take the strain. Who‘s going to be the first to try it out? :yikes:

In the event of a re-failure there are plans for a complete remanufacture of the sprocket clamping mechanism.

Since, in this case, the bolt was slack but for the locking compound, a good service check would be to simply test the tightness of the bolt. Easily done at oil change time, especially on the V-twin bikes since the side panel is removed anyway. Bear in mind that no red dust was externally present.
 

Attachments

  • 20190819_195604~2.jpg
    20190819_195604~2.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 165
  • 20190819_194148.jpg
    20190819_194148.jpg
    34.5 KB · Views: 184
  • 20190819_193930.jpg
    20190819_193930.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 185
  • 20190819_185113.jpg
    20190819_185113.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 178
  • 20190819_184014_HDR.jpg
    20190819_184014_HDR.jpg
    41.8 KB · Views: 184
  • 20190819_171824.jpg
    20190819_171824.jpg
    43.4 KB · Views: 172
  • 20190819_171808.jpg
    20190819_171808.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 180
  • 20190819_163119.jpg
    20190819_163119.jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 187
  • 20190819_195707~2.jpg
    20190819_195707~2.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 185
  • 20190819_195626~2.jpg
    20190819_195626~2.jpg
    46.4 KB · Views: 162
Great write up and pics. Note to self add that to the mechanic's list. Thanks for posting.
Enjoy you trip. Going anywhere interesting?
 
Would you please tell us which year Spyder you have? Thanks!
Yes, sorry. 2017. I might add that there were signs of there being some lubricant in there from manufacture but it wasn't much, just a little almost dried remains in the end groove past the splines.
 
:congrats: Good job and have a great trip:nopic: if you think about it!!! We can all live threw you, threw the pictures!!! Good Luck
 
My F3 is at 17,300 miles and New Bolt put on at 10,000 is VERY tight. I'll wait for it to fail or show symptoms since AMA will tow me home 35 miles for free and I'm usually no more than 50 miles radius from the house. For the Long Trip you were Very Wise!!!
 
Very similar...

20150630_104832.jpg 20150630_104820.jpg 20150630_121226.jpg 20150630_121204.jpg On mine the bolt streched and was loose, the sprocket would slide about drying the shaft and creating the rusting. You can see the end worn on the sprocket compared to the new one. Swapped out the flywheel and re-installed with new bolt and washer and all has been good. I found the problem when I shut down the engine and my mp3 and coasted into the garage and could hear a knuckle grinding sound. So checked the torque on the bolt and it was loose so re-torqued till I got the new parts....:thumbup:
 
View attachment 175099 View attachment 175097 View attachment 175100 View attachment 175098 On mine the bolt streched and was loose, the sprocket would slide about drying the shaft and creating the rusting. You can see the end worn on the sprocket compared to the new one. Swapped out the flywheel and re-installed with new bolt and washer and all has been good. I found the problem when I shut down the engine and my mp3 and coasted into the garage and could hear a knuckle grinding sound. So checked the torque on the bolt and it was loose so re-torqued till I got the new parts....:thumbup:

THE BOLT STRETCHED :gaah: … I don't think I've ever seen that happen …. Since I'm sure you re-placed that bolt was New one shorter ???? …. Glad you cought it ….. Mike :ohyea:
 
Strange as it may seem... when I re-torqued it so I could keep rydeing till the parts came in from Cheapcycleparts.com I could not go to the full recommended torque as I could feel it stretching or at best mushy...:yikes:
 
Firstly, thanks to you folks on the forum, without you I wouldn‘t have been aware of the front sprocket rusting issue.

...

A wee poke around with my Camera probe a few weeks ago showed I have the same issue, luckily I have a 3 year warranty so I hope to have it sorted soon, because we here in Australia barrack for the Canadian Swim team because we suspect parts come to Australia taped to the back of a swimmer - so Go Canada!!!
 
Strange as it may seem... when I re-torqued it so I could keep rydeing till the parts came in from Cheapcycleparts.com I could not go to the full recommended torque as I could feel it stretching or at best mushy...:yikes:

That would suggest that there are lower & higher grade bolts being used. What makings do folks have on the head of the bolt on their trike?

Mine has 10.9 - which I retorqued to 110 ftlb about 7 years ago. No sign of red dust before or since.

"A tempered medium carbon steel. Class 10.9 is stronger than class 8.8, and is commonly found in high strength automotive applications. Class 10.9 is similar to grade 8 imperial. Zinc plated for moderate corrosion resistance"
 
Strange as it may seem... when I re-torqued it so I could keep rydeing till the parts came in from Cheapcycleparts.com I could not go to the full recommended torque as I could feel it stretching or at best mushy...:yikes:
I think you've reached the yield point of the bolt. When metal is stretched it pretty much carries the load and then it reaches its yield point. At this time it continues to carry the same load but by continuing loading it, it stretches. After this the metal begins to thin and this is the start of complete failure. I'd check the accuracy of your torque wrench, it wouldn't be unusual to have a 10% error.

On a different bike I worked on the sprocket for a completely different reason but tightened the bolt until I felt it yield then checked the torque and it was approx 120lb/ft. That's why I set 110lb/ft this time and why I mentioned a stronger bolt. Of course, I've no idea of the accuracy of my torque wrench either! :D


Freddy said:
...Mine has 10.9 - which I retorqued to 110 ftlb about 7 years ago. No sign of red dust before or since...
That's good to know since mine also is a 10.9 bolt and now at 110. (ish). :)
 
I think you've reached the yield point of the bolt. When metal is stretched it pretty much carries the load and then it reaches its yield point. At this time it continues to carry the same load but by continuing loading it, it stretches. After this the metal begins to thin and this is the start of complete failure. I'd check the accuracy of your torque wrench, it wouldn't be unusual to have a 10% error.

On a different bike I worked on the sprocket for a completely different reason but tightened the bolt until I felt it yield then checked the torque and it was approx 120lb/ft. That's why I set 110lb/ft this time and why I mentioned a stronger bolt. Of course, I've no idea of the accuracy of my torque wrench either! :D


That's good to know since mine also is a 10.9 bolt and now at 110. (ish). :)

It is recommended that bolt NOT be reused as well as the washer. I replaced them as well as the flywheel weight bolts. They come with the loctite already on them...:thumbup:
 
That's the same as the later V2 engines. When I did mine I checked the max torque a bolt of that spec was made to handle - 135 ftlb. I went roughly 15% higher (with a new OEM bolt :ohyea:) than the revised BRP spec of ~95 (which is roughly 15% higher than the early/original factory torque on the V2 engines which had the first round of failures). I see no problem reusing the hardened washer. Heck, checking the bolt's torque and tightening it to the correct tension is much better than not knowing when/if it's going to strip the splines and leave you stranded, as we've seen reported. But if it has red dust thereabouts, check a little deeper.
 
Just going to throw this out there. I bought a new bolt for my inspection, it's a flange head M12 X 60 DIN 6921 S Grip. Built in washer. My 2019 RTL manual has the torque at 111 Ft/Lb ±4 Ft/Lb. That's 150 n ±5 N for our friends across the way.

Drive System.jpg
 
Back
Top