• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

So it's called the Ryker!

The only thing that stands out is the off road capabilities.

I don't see them doing anything 'off-road' in the videos with it that I haven't done with my Spyder(s). Many worry too much about the belt and gravel roads. On my 2008 GS I used to fishtale up and down gravel and dirt roads all the time... never had a belt issue in the 75,000+ miles I put on it....

And with such low HP and torque it's not going to tear up the trails....
 
single
41616373_1982110318494837_2964606235535474688_n.jpg

Looks cool.

single seater.. no place for significant other to ride??????????? NO THANKS!
BIG F
 
The only thing that stands out is the off road capabilities.

I don't know about the off road capabilities. I think they just mean gravel roads, which can be a problem for the current models. I don't see them intending these to be ridden on a trail. Doesn't mean people won't try though.
 
Look at the engine specs:

600cc ACE in-line two cylinder starting at $8499 - 47hp 35torque
900cc ACE in-line three cylinder starting at $9999 - 77hp 56 torque

Not much oomph going on there...…especially with a CVT where you can't drop a gear when passing, etc.

Such low torque won't bode well for off-roading.....


 
Hi Dan!
You have to remember that this bike wasn't "Built for the Blackwater..."
It was built more for the dirt road, the poorly maintained road, and the sort of off-road trail that you might take your Grandma on...:thumbup:
 
Overall this looks like a neat product at a good price, and it's really cool that it has a shaft drive, but it sure is ugly to my eyes. You add the saddlebags and a rear seat to it and it's still ugly. Looks like a Japanese robot. Same is true of the Yamaha Nikken. People buy stuff they are attracted to. I don't predict either this or the Nikken to be huge successes for that reason alone.


How does the saying go? Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
 
CVT

I have a Subaru outback as well as a Toyota Tacoma. Both have CVT transmissions and both are capable of dropping a gear to pass. Not sure what you are talking about in reference to this. On both you hear the Tranny shifting and can manually shift via paddle shift on the Subaru.
 
Shaft drive?
Now that "the tip of the Camel's nose, is inside the tent-flap": who knows where it'll show up next? :dontknow:
 
I like that they went to a hub in the rear.
This should make changing and upgrading tyres much easier.
 
I have a Subaru outback as well as a Toyota Tacoma. Both have CVT transmissions and both are capable of dropping a gear to pass. Not sure what you are talking about in reference to this. On both you hear the Tranny shifting and can manually shift via paddle shift on the Subaru.
Dave,
It's NOTHING like your Suby's CVT. Ski Doo has been using this type of tranny in their snowmobile for over 60 years, and they've got it to the point where it's 100% reliable and smooth. :thumbup:

Automotive CVTs can only wish that they were half as good! nojoke
 
Hi Dan!
You have to remember that this bike wasn't "Built for the Blackwater..."
It was built more for the dirt road, the poorly maintained road, and the sort of off-road trail that you might take your Grandma on...:thumbup:

You mean it was built for northern Ontario !!! ( poorly maintained roads )
 
I have a Subaru outback as well as a Toyota Tacoma. Both have CVT transmissions and both are capable of dropping a gear to pass. Not sure what you are talking about in reference to this. On both you hear the Tranny shifting and can manually shift via paddle shift on the Subaru.

True CVT's don't have 'gears to drop into'...… The Tacoma is a 'hybrid' CVT as it still has a first gear it uses before the CVT kicks in.
You also have to realize the Tacoma is a torque monster compared to these fugly mopeds:

600cc ACE in-line two cylinder - 47hp 35torque

900cc ACE in-line three cylinder - 77hp 56 torque
 
I have a Subaru outback as well as a Toyota Tacoma. Both have CVT transmissions and both are capable of dropping a gear to pass. Not sure what you are talking about in reference to this. On both you hear the Tranny shifting and can manually shift via paddle shift on the Subaru.

It's a different animal. There are no gears, very few moving parts in fact. You have a primary clutch and a secondary clutch (basically 2 pulleys that "squeeze" the belt between them). Between those 2 clutches is a belt. As RPMS go up or down the clutches open or close to shift the position of the belt in them. This provides an infinite number of points (gears) in the power range. You never have to shift and you will never over rev the engine (provided the clutches are set up properly) but that also mean if you want a bunch of instant power you can't just drop a gear and punch it. Punching it will make you go faster but in more of a linear fashion (especially with these motors). You could let off the throttle a bit and then punch it but still its more of a linear power build. I can see how quick passing might be difficult with these bikes.

I'll have to ride one to see if it delivers a satisfying amount of power and fun for me. The styling is fine for me. The bare bones nature is fine for me. A test ride will tell me if the engine/CVT deliver enough fun and if the seating position can be adjusted to be a non cruiser comfortable position. As much as I want to buy a new Spyder it looks like I'll be riding the RS for at least another year.
 
I like that they went to a hub in the rear.
This should make changing and upgrading tyres much easier.

Yeah.. that, the single swingarm and the shaft drive are the only positives I see about this machine.
You lose a bunch of power using a SHAFT DRIVE, so I wouldn't think it will make it's way into an F3 until they get the engine into the 1800 range.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top