• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Shift rpms and Fuel Economy...

Hi Sunshine! :D
The RS/GS engines were tuned to produce 106 hp...
The RTs were tuned for 100 hp; but at approximately 750 lower rpm...
That's how...
That Math was so simple that I even understood it myself... ;)
 
You mentioned your experience with Go-Karts; where did they make their power?
I'd bet you a nickel that they were spinning some pretty decent revs to get you to 100 mph...
 
How are you coming up with "over 100 hp"?

And I will be as tactful as I can here... Don't assume I don't have driving experience with machines of lower cubic inch displacements that perform well or that I don't understand power band ranges of those varied machine engine. I have driven go-carts with chain saw engine power plants that can reach speeds well over 100 mph.


I guess you don't need my comments. You refuted your own assertion.
 
Ummm... another person that wanted a dump-truck and mistakenly bought a Ferrari...:roflblack: One would have thought he took it for a test-drive before buying it. Geez... Wonders never cease...

I just hope there is nothing in the GW's manual that he cannot understand, or he might have other problems with it.

Seems the guy cannot take advice from others when his mind is already shut with his misguided perceptions and opinions. Must be lonely in there...:shocked:
 
Last edited:
Let's try to remember... Everybody is entitled to their own opinion.... and preferences! :thumbup: ;)
We have a fair amount of folks in here riding other brands; they do show enough class and decency to not continue to trash our bikes...
We can always hope that Dave finds happiness somewhere...
 
Let's try to remember... Everybody is entitled to their own opinion.... and preferences! :thumbup: ;)
We have a fair amount of folks in here riding other brands; they do show enough class and decency to not continue to trash our bikes...
We can always hope that Dave finds happiness somewhere...

At this point, I bet Dave N. is just messing with us. This could not continue to be for real. :dontknow:
 
Mileage

I usually shift at 4500 to 5500. 4500 rpms shifts very smooth. My mileage I am not sure of, it was on 140 miles and it filled up at 4.2 gals with no gas light yet. Still had 4 bars left.
 
How are you coming up with "over 100 hp"?

And I will be as tactful as I can here... Don't assume I don't have driving experience with machines of lower cubic inch displacements that perform well or that I don't understand power band ranges of those varied machine engine. I have driven go-carts with chain saw engine power plants that can reach speeds well over 100 mph.

Do you run the go-cart engine at 3000 rpm or less? I doubt it for the same reason the Spyder is not run at those low RPM's.
 
I've been kind of amused by Dave's rants...
He clearly has absolutely no sense of History, and even less patience. :shocked: Poor guy! :shocked:
Yes; we all know that GoldWings are one GREAT Horizon finder. Honda has gone to great lengths to make sure that their Fllagship vehicle is one to be proud of... :thumbup:
But, they've been building and selling them since 1975.
How many of you can remember the GL1000s?
let's see:
Busted timing belts, bent valves, questionable brakelines that ballooned under pressure... rough suspensions, NO low-end power!
Did you ever ride one? They were pretty crude; even for the time.
Let's add the 1100s...
Stators, stereo channels, The Comcast wheels that would fall apart... weak-kneed suspension systems...
(I HAD one of these and put 50,000 wonderful miles on it!)
Even in recent years, they had an issue with frames breaking...
Now; my point is NOT to knock Honda; they build great stuff!
I'm just pointing out that getting it right is a process that takes time and development...
BRP will get it; just as Honda did before them... :thumbup:
Now; excuse me... I'm late for the MENSA meeting! They need me there to serve as a bad example... :roflblack:
 
I've been kind of amused by Dave's rants...
He clearly has absolutely no sense of History, and even less patience. :shocked: Poor guy! :shocked:
Yes; we all know that GoldWings are one GREAT Horizon finder. Honda has gone to great lengths to make sure that their Fllagship vehicle is one to be proud of... :thumbup:
But, they've been building and selling them since 1975.
How many of you can remember the GL1000s?
let's see:
Busted timing belts, bent valves, questionable brakelines that ballooned under pressure... rough suspensions, NO low-end power!
Did you ever ride one? They were pretty crude; even for the time.
Let's add the 1100s...
Stators, stereo channels, The Comcast wheels that would fall apart... weak-kneed suspension systems...
(I HAD one of these and put 50,000 wonderful miles on it!)
Even in recent years, they had an issue with frames breaking...
Now; my point is NOT to knock Honda; they build great stuff!
I'm just pointing out that getting it right is a process that takes time and development...
BRP will get it; just as Honda did before them... :thumbup:
Now; excuse me... I'm late for the MENSA meeting! They need me there to serve as a bad example... :roflblack:

I'm not going to knock the GW either, but want to complete your list.

The GL1800 was introduced in late 2000, early 2001, right about when everyone had settle in nicely with the GL1500. The 1800 gripe session included the following:

Radiators - Moved up to give the bike a slimmer look, but not as effective at cooling. Traffic stops would bury the temp needle into the red, as the fan would turn off and not turn back on. 13 service bulletins later, the issue was resolved Hot leg complaints began and still continue to this day. The fix is Baker air wings and heat shielding.

Engines - valves went to shims, instead of hydraulic and timing chains, instead of belt. While the increased power was welcome, the engines were noisier. The fix....turn up the radio

Tires - New Bridgestones cupped at 3000 miles.

Plastics and panels - Thin and cheap feeling. Much grumbling about quality control. Rubber grommets would push in when trying to reinstall.

Exhaust - Looked and sounded great, but mounting points would break.

Frames - Much improved with fewer parts, but some impacted by failings.

Kill switch - Would kill the engine at inopportune moments.

Hot start issues, final drive failures, heated grip failures, squeaky breaks, head bearing issues, latch failures, etc., etc.

Honda has released countless service bulletins for their much refined flagship product as well. It took time and patience to get the GW to where it is now....even the current model.

There are still steady streams of inquiries regarding roasting legs and chestnuts. Uncomfortable saddles and peg positions and just about everything else being added for comfort on the wings as well. Our friend Dave simply refuses to accept fact.

There's talk about big changes to their 2015 line, including a factory built trike. It most likely will include some pain for owners until refinements, bulletins, etc. take care of those issue. To some, that will be unacceptible and will prove the loss of direction for Honda and the demise of the company, while others go out and enjoy their new rides. Glad Dave's buying a 2013.
 
Just for fun I asked four individual guys who upon seeing my Spyder sitting in my driveway today and stopped to ask about - - yes, they all said they're interested in buying a Spyder - - to take a look at this: "clutch is fully stalled at 3200 (+/- 200) rpm's", and to please tell me what it means. None could. To the contrary, printing this: "So, they clearly warn you in the manual", is not helpful or factual. If a person can't understand the 'jargon' then it's meaningless.

Did you not even slightly consider that "stall" might mean "engaged"? I don't believe it would take a high level of intelligence to understand what it meant in context of the manual.

Did you not once attempt to exercise your brain to consider what "stalled" might mean?

Or do you, as a matter of practice in your life, skip-past anything that you do not understand -- hoping it does not matter, or that someone one else will figure it out and let you know?

Geez... Good luck... Hope you get your Spyder sold so you are able to move on.
 
Sometimes, spoon-feeding them isn't enough; they expect you to chew it up, and spit it into their open mouths too...:shocked::barf:
 
What does the other side of this questions look like? We've done a great job of discussing keeping RPM's up, but I'm still a little unclear on the other side of the equation.

What is the high end of the RPM scale that you can ride at for an extended period of time without risking damage to the engine on that side? I don't tend to be much over 6000, but don't know if 7000 or even 8000 is a safe number, or not.

For the most part I try to be between about 4500 and 6000, and usually take the canyons in 3rd gear, or in 2nd if the curves are particularly tight (shifting at every curve just gets to be a bit much, so I try to keep a good balance).

Where are the upper limits?
 
I think that would have to fall into the realm of "common sense"...
You probably wouldn't find anybody who is too sympathetic if you tried running highway speeds in first gear...
:yikes:
 
What does the other side of this questions look like? We've done a great job of discussing keeping RPM's up, but I'm still a little unclear on the other side of the equation.

What is the high end of the RPM scale that you can ride at for an extended period of time without risking damage to the engine on that side? I don't tend to be much over 6000, but don't know if 7000 or even 8000 is a safe number, or not.

For the most part I try to be between about 4500 and 6000, and usually take the canyons in 3rd gear, or in 2nd if the curves are particularly tight (shifting at every curve just gets to be a bit much, so I try to keep a good balance).

Where are the upper limits?

BRP recommends more frequent valve checks if 10% of your time over 14,000 miles is spent above 6K. Several here run in excess of 6K often. That said, look at it this way.....10% of 14,000 miles = 1,400 miles running above 6K. Will you exceed that?
 
Back
Top