Kumho is OK, Maxxis is better
(This was originally posted over in the ST side, but applies here as well.) Over the course of 65,000 miles on my 2008s I ran a couple sets of the OEM Kendas on each one but they didn't last very long (5,000+). We then started using Kumhos and Maxxis tires, averaging 7,300 miles on each of those rear tires through the years. Now on my new 2013 ST-S the OEM Kenda rear tire was really bald down the middle at only 2,500 miles! I squeaked another 1,250 miles out of it, so it was completely bald in the center section when we replaced it, and I mean completely. These cheap two-ply Kenda tires wear out the middle first due to the high speed centrifugal force that makes it balloon out in the middle. Many will be quick to say it is the tire pressure being too high, but with this tire high speed operation is the culprit. I never spin the rear tire, just accelerate and brake aggressively. I guess.....
So after four of the stock Kenda tires on the 2008s I switched to Kumhos, wore out four of them. They last longer, wear better, but the traction isn't quite as good from what we found. After the four Kumhos we went to the Maxxis and so far the Maxxis has been the most impressive. It is a MA-Z4S Victra 95V with 420 treadwear, AA traction and A temperature. Tough to find a better treadwear rating with AA traction in this size. The Kumho (speed rating is only H -130 mph, treadwear is 400 with traction A and temperature A) is easier to find, but the Maxxis is a better tire (higher 148 mph speed rating, AA traction, slightly higher treadwear rating). For under $10 more. It is a Cheng Shin tire, best price (with shipping) so far has been onlinetires.com. Cosmetically the Maxxis is also the closest to the OEM tire in terms of tread pattern. But I do know FAR more people here have used the Kumho than the Maxxis, probably due to availability.
So far I have stayed with the OEM 225/50R15 size, but one can go to one of the other sizes to get more options and better tread wear ratings. There are many more options when you go to a 215/60R15 (+5.4% diameter) or even 205/60R15 (+3.5% diameter). It is really tough to find anything in the 215/55R15 (+1.9% diameter) or 205/55R15 (+0.1% diameter) sizes, as they are closer in diameter than the 60s, but all of these will work as far as I have been able to determine by previous posts. There’s also 225/55R15 but also tough to find, that one is +3.7% in diameter. The 4-ply tires seem to be slightly heavier, but this is perfectly acceptable for the higher quality and durability. 2-ply is cheap junk. On my 2013 ST-S this time I wanted to try the Toyo Proxes 4, just to try something different, so far so good but it has an even lower treadwear rating (300) but is AA traction and A temperature with V (148 mph) speed rating. Next time it will be a Nexen N2000, looks very close to the Michelin Hydro Edge tread (too bad they quit making that one, tires rack just sold the last three they had left).
I get a kick out of those who get their rear tires to last over 10,000 miles. Do you also get 40 MPG? You’d better burn the carbon out of the damn thing!
