Octane - no 87, so alternating between 93 and 89... thoughts?

[BLUEKNIGHT911]

ANSWER IS

But what are you riding? :dontknow: I don't see any mention of your bike anywhere...

He has an 2014 RT - S....... Mike :thumbup:

 

[Bob Denman]

Thanks! I didn't see that.
In that case: use 91 octane.........


...unless you don't want to!

 

[BLUEKNIGHT911]

NO SEE

Thanks! I didn't see that.
In that case: use 91 octane.........


...unless you don't want to!

Well there was nothing to see, .......in His history He mentioned He owned that model.......:thumbup::thumbup:

 

[Bob Denman]

I'm going in to get looked-over for some new glasses on the 12th: HONEST! :shocked:



These dang bikes will pretty much run on whatever they can get to burn. The computer will do it's dead-level best, to try and prevent anything ugly from happening. nojoke
But if you want your bike to run as well as it possible can: use the fuel that they recommend. :thumbup:

 

[jcthorne]

I burn 87 as a rule and get 40+ mpg. never saw any diff with 91 other than .50 more a gallon.

You may not see it but your engine sure does. Compression and octane ratings are not myths perpetrated to take money away from you.

 

[sandeejs]

Thanks, all

So the wisdom of the list is that my great idea is not so great. I'll not post a picture of the cure modification I made to show me which octanes turn it was.
~Sandee~