There's no denying that the 1330 is a torquier motor, with grunt coming on strong right off idle.... so if you're used to low revving motors, or if higher revs are a problem for you/the way you ride your V-Twin, that can be attractive; and the better fuel economy & longer service intervals can also be attractive for some...... :dontknow: But I didn't buy my Spyder to be a lazy, economical, & cheap to maintain addition to my life; I
like to rev out and
RIDE my revvy V-Twin 2013 RT; and to me, the 1330 powered Spyder's are no longer lean, mean, & exciting to ride machines, but simply excessively & needlessly 'plush', heavier, & lazier engined machines when compared to the lighter, peppier, revvier, and down-right more exciting V-Twin powered Spyders! And I've not yet met a 1330 powered Spyder that matches the outright buzz I get from working that mildly enhanced V-Twin motor in my mildly enhanced 2013 RT! :thumbup:
Sure, the 1330 powered Spyder's can be '
nice', and you can even '
have fun' on one; they even make for reasonable touring &/or towing - it's actually a great motor in a '
pretty good' package, albeit excessively optioned with basically useless fripperies and suffering from a few 'poor execution' issues in an otherwise remarkable piece of engineering.... but
to me, the 1330 motor just isn't
exciting, and even when you
use the entire rev range & wring it right out occasionally (or more often

) it
still feels lazy & sounds like you're ever-revving an old Singer sewing machine in order to try to & force it to behave like a Ferrari! :shocked:
Yes, I know that you need to get & keep the revs up a bit on the V-Twins to get into & stay in the power band (& keep the SE5's clutch happy

) but the V-Twins rev out a fair bit higher than the 1330's, so their overall '
useful rev range' is somewhat wider than the 1330's; and if you get an ECU Upgrade done to remove the senseless de-tuning restrictions that BRP put on these motors in order to keep the masses from enjoying themselves too much, the V-Twin motor especially can score an extended rev range that unleashes even more power, and yet
STILL remains within the factory deemed '
safe & reliable' rev range used by the same motors in other applications. Plus, if you are strong enough to resist the temptation to use the extra revs & power
all the time, an ECU Upgraded V-Twin can get very nearly the same fuel economy as the 1330's, altho because of the V-Twin's smaller gas tank, you'll never quite match the longer range the 1330 powered Spyders can get from the extra usable gallon or so they can hold in their tank! :sour:
Still, while I don't know about you, Cahoots, but for
ME, there just isn't any Spyder available with the 1330 motor that excites me enough to want to '
upgrade' (or more correctly for me,
down-grade!

) to a 1330 - and even the handling improvements offered by the 2020+ Spyders don't tempt me,
ESPECIALLY since they only come with that bloody annoying & fiddly digital dash & integration software that doesn't work well for so many & not at all for some!! So at least for now,
I'm still gonna be sticking with my mildly enhanced 2013 RT with it's mildly enhanced V-Twin motor and it's clear, easy to read & use dash, with no 'useless to me' extra fripperies or unwanted, not well executed, 'optional extras' that can't be circumvented easily; and I reckon I'll keep on enjoying riding my V-Twin powered Spyder until I can't ride any more

hyea:
ESPECIALLY if BRP keeps on 'dandifying' & degrading the Spyder package the way I feel they have ever since introducing the 1330 motors!! :banghead:
But that is just
me! YMMV?! :dontknow:
Cheers :cheers: