Dragonrider
New member
It was a terrific day in the Great NorthWet, and the road beckoned.
Let me preface this by saying that my favorite two wheeler, on which I have logged over 150,000 miles, was and is the original Valkyrie - and today, my riding partner was my friend of 20+ years, who bought his Valk in 1999, with about 36K on the clock, and keeps it spotless.
We departed Portland at 0730, to circumnavigate Mt. St. Helens - a total of almost 400 miles for me. The Spyder gave a 38.5mpg day, with lots of altitude changes, and hard running twisties.
Observations: The roads had lots of water caused damage - heaves, depressions, pavement cracks and slippage - causing the Spyder to bottom out 5 times. The new rear tire is less forgiving on grooved pavement, wagging like a happy dog, and there's a noticeable vibration around 75mph (legal posted speed limit - and we were the slowest vehicles on the road!). All in all, nothing to really complain about, the Spyder ran flawlessly, never showed more than three bars on the temp gauge, and never added heat to any part of my anatomy...
BTW, the noisy fuel pump isn't noisy anymore..
Now for the comparisons I promised.
Spyder vs Valk.
1. The Spyder is faster off the line, shifts faster, and accelerates better.
2. The Spyder stops quicker
3. The Spyder is about 5mph faster in the corners - the Valk is scraping bits, while the Spyder is still sailing.
4. The Spyder handles squirrelly roads and unexpected 20mph hairpin turns better
5. The Valk is a whole lot less work on twisty roads
6. The Valk (Crobra 6x2) sounds WAYYYYY better than the Spyder
7. The Valk feels more comfortable, and solidly planted at 75 on the freeway - not that the Spyder is unacceptable, just that the Valk feels better.
Both bikes delivered about the same milage, and it's not fair to compare lux features. Both bikes have storage, windshields, and are set up for touring.
So if you are considering coming off a nice two wheeler, you won't be losing a thing - though you may get buff shoulders and arms, if you frequent the twisties...
Let me preface this by saying that my favorite two wheeler, on which I have logged over 150,000 miles, was and is the original Valkyrie - and today, my riding partner was my friend of 20+ years, who bought his Valk in 1999, with about 36K on the clock, and keeps it spotless.

We departed Portland at 0730, to circumnavigate Mt. St. Helens - a total of almost 400 miles for me. The Spyder gave a 38.5mpg day, with lots of altitude changes, and hard running twisties.

Observations: The roads had lots of water caused damage - heaves, depressions, pavement cracks and slippage - causing the Spyder to bottom out 5 times. The new rear tire is less forgiving on grooved pavement, wagging like a happy dog, and there's a noticeable vibration around 75mph (legal posted speed limit - and we were the slowest vehicles on the road!). All in all, nothing to really complain about, the Spyder ran flawlessly, never showed more than three bars on the temp gauge, and never added heat to any part of my anatomy...
BTW, the noisy fuel pump isn't noisy anymore..
Now for the comparisons I promised.
Spyder vs Valk.
1. The Spyder is faster off the line, shifts faster, and accelerates better.
2. The Spyder stops quicker
3. The Spyder is about 5mph faster in the corners - the Valk is scraping bits, while the Spyder is still sailing.
4. The Spyder handles squirrelly roads and unexpected 20mph hairpin turns better
5. The Valk is a whole lot less work on twisty roads
6. The Valk (Crobra 6x2) sounds WAYYYYY better than the Spyder
7. The Valk feels more comfortable, and solidly planted at 75 on the freeway - not that the Spyder is unacceptable, just that the Valk feels better.
Both bikes delivered about the same milage, and it's not fair to compare lux features. Both bikes have storage, windshields, and are set up for touring.
So if you are considering coming off a nice two wheeler, you won't be losing a thing - though you may get buff shoulders and arms, if you frequent the twisties...

Last edited: