NancysToy
Motorbike Professor
Perhaps I should have phrased this better. What I mean is that it is irresponsible for a technician to either fail to explain very thoroughly, or to fail to fix (or even search for) the problem. Looking for a low battery would certainly be a good approach. No customer should be told to just ignore warning codes and continue to ride. If the tech has no idea of the cause, he might explain that he can't find it, and for the customer to bring it in if it occurs again...but he should never say to merely ignore it. If it is important enough to generate a warning, it should be important enough to respond to. If it is not that important, it should not generate a warning.As you know a low battery can throw all sorts of "ghost codes" that have nothing to do with an actual problem other than a low battery. Those codes would show up on buds as occurred faults but would have nothing to do with a real problem so there is a reason a tech or BRP could say that and be valid.
A case in point is the "ghost" low oil pressure warnings that occur on the RT sometimes after oil changes. First advice..."Just ignore it and ride it a while." Sorry, that goes completely against what the oil pressure warning is there for! The work-around is actually to run the engine above 3,500 rpm for 15-20 seconds. If that doesn't cure it, it should be shut off and thoroughly diagnosed. It would be far better to find and fix the programming error, but the work-around would be OK if explained thoroughly, and if the owner was told when the warning should not be ignored...going down the road, repeated occurances, or accompanied by engine noises. This is one case where simple is not better.