• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Lemon Law

As you know a low battery can throw all sorts of "ghost codes" that have nothing to do with an actual problem other than a low battery. Those codes would show up on buds as occurred faults but would have nothing to do with a real problem so there is a reason a tech or BRP could say that and be valid.
Perhaps I should have phrased this better. What I mean is that it is irresponsible for a technician to either fail to explain very thoroughly, or to fail to fix (or even search for) the problem. Looking for a low battery would certainly be a good approach. No customer should be told to just ignore warning codes and continue to ride. If the tech has no idea of the cause, he might explain that he can't find it, and for the customer to bring it in if it occurs again...but he should never say to merely ignore it. If it is important enough to generate a warning, it should be important enough to respond to. If it is not that important, it should not generate a warning.

A case in point is the "ghost" low oil pressure warnings that occur on the RT sometimes after oil changes. First advice..."Just ignore it and ride it a while." Sorry, that goes completely against what the oil pressure warning is there for! The work-around is actually to run the engine above 3,500 rpm for 15-20 seconds. If that doesn't cure it, it should be shut off and thoroughly diagnosed. It would be far better to find and fix the programming error, but the work-around would be OK if explained thoroughly, and if the owner was told when the warning should not be ignored...going down the road, repeated occurances, or accompanied by engine noises. This is one case where simple is not better.
 
Perhaps I should have phrased this better. What I mean is that it is irresponsible for a technician to either fail to explain very thoroughly, or to fail to fix (or even search for) the problem. Looking for a low battery would certainly be a good approach. No customer should be told to just ignore warning codes and continue to ride. If the tech has no idea of the cause, he might explain that he can't find it, and for the customer to bring it in if it occurs again...but he should never say to merely ignore it. If it is important enough to generate a warning, it should be important enough to respond to. If it is not that important, it should not generate a warning.

A case in point is the "ghost" low oil pressure warnings that occur on the RT sometimes after oil changes. First advice..."Just ignore it and ride it a while." Sorry, that goes completely against what the oil pressure warning is there for! The work-around is actually to run the engine above 3,500 rpm for 15-20 seconds. If that doesn't cure it, it should be shut off and thoroughly diagnosed. It would be far better to find and fix the programming error, but the work-around would be OK if explained thoroughly, and if the owner was told when the warning should not be ignored...going down the road, repeated occurances, or accompanied by engine noises. This is one case where simple is not better.
The real problem as I see it is this thing throws way too many codes that aren't real to start with. To me the "limp home" thing may have seemed like a good idea to someone but I have yet to see where this is going to help anyone including BRP. What good is it really? You could argue that it will save the motor or whatever from further damage but we have gone a long time without a "limp home" mode and done just fine by watching our gauges. I would like to see them get rid of the "limp home" mode altogether and just shut the thing down if there's a real problem. Maybe this is a case of TMI [too much information]
 
The real problem as I see it is this thing throws way too many codes that aren't real to start with. To me the "limp home" thing may have seemed like a good idea to someone but I have yet to see where this is going to help anyone including BRP. What good is it really? You could argue that it will save the motor or whatever from further damage but we have gone a long time without a "limp home" mode and done just fine by watching our gauges. I would like to see them get rid of the "limp home" mode altogether and just shut the thing down if there's a real problem. Maybe this is a case of TMI [too much information]

:agree: I'm with you on this one 100%. The Nanny is way over protective.
 
Even if it's a "ghost" that peed in the pudding, it still shows that something isn't quite up to snuff and needs addressing... A loose battery connection is still a problem when it shuts your bike down. Perhaps the systems are both too sophisticated and too simple at the same time... It knows that something's wrong, but can't adequately determine what it is, so it sets off the fire alarm instead of just a gentle nudge to the shoulder...:shocked:
So... Does New Mexico recognize motorcycles as being subject to Lemon Laws or not?
 
I am also in favor of getting rid of the limp home mode. It is scarry when it kicks in--and does not always happen because something drastic is going on with the :spyder2:.

TMI is a good category for it.
 
The real problem as I see it is this thing throws way too many codes that aren't real to start with. To me the "limp home" thing may have seemed like a good idea to someone but I have yet to see where this is going to help anyone including BRP. What good is it really? You could argue that it will save the motor or whatever from further damage but we have gone a long time without a "limp home" mode and done just fine by watching our gauges. I would like to see them get rid of the "limp home" mode altogether and just shut the thing down if there's a real problem. Maybe this is a case of TMI [too much information]
I think TMI summarizes it pretty well. I wouldn't mind seeing it go, but I can understand their thinking for some things, like a transmission, brake, or steering malfunction. Shutting it off would be even more dangerous. Imagine the thrill of that while you were cruising at 80! :yikes: Besides, shutting it down due to the "ghost" codes would be even more frustrating. There has to be a happy medium, I hope they find it someday.
 
As you know a low battery can throw all sorts of "ghost codes" that have nothing to do with an actual problem other than a low battery. Those codes would show up on buds as occurred faults but would have nothing to do with a real problem so there is a reason a tech or BRP could say that and be valid.


Yes I agree. That was one of the first things that BRP suggested was to check the battery. Dealer checked it out, it was charged to max.
 
Even if it's a "ghost" that peed in the pudding, it still shows that something isn't quite up to snuff and needs addressing... A loose battery connection is still a problem when it shuts your bike down. Perhaps the systems are both too sophisticated and too simple at the same time... It knows that something's wrong, but can't adequately determine what it is, so it sets off the fire alarm instead of just a gentle nudge to the shoulder...:shocked:
So... Does New Mexico recognize motorcycles as being subject to Lemon Laws or not?


Yes it does.
 
"Patience is a virtue that none of us can wait to acquire..." Something is obviously not quite right, and your dealer is mindlessly plugging it in and finding nothing... :shocked: They need to actually LOOK for the problem.
My Missus hit on a good point last night over dinner. (We've got to have SOMETHING to discuss!)
If you think that Can Am is alone with this problem; try leaving the gas cap on your car loose and see what happens... Even they haven't got that one worked out well-enough yet to simply tell you to go tighten it up!
 
Give them some time and they'll smooth out the rough edges... :thumbup:[/QUOTE


You know what Bob I have been listening to that since I bought the first Spyder almost 5 years ago! What the heck do they need to wake them up? A couple of multi-million dollar law suits?

Scotty I wasn't doing 80 MPH but I was in the left lane at 75MPH passing someone when the thing went into limp mode once. The only thing that saved me was there was no one behind me real close when it took place. This was with the first spyder which eventually ate 3 oil pressure remote switches. The 3rd one left me in Klamath, Oregon in permanent limp mode. Because of the lack of a decent and experienced dealer service system I had to chose a U-haul and bring the thing home that way to West Virginia.

Sure Lamont get rid of limp mode and just make the thing stop dead. If they had done that I would be dead and have stopped dead on the road 2 dozen or more times. They need to back off on the computer a bit and get more down to basics of keeping it safe and reliable for not just a motorhead but a normal consumer. I will say one thing my now present RT has only gone into limp mode about 5 times or less. The first one it was and endless battle, this one is far less of a battle.

When you get a bunch of seemingly endless questions about reoccuring problems and Lemon Laws they have a problem which they are not admitting or addressing properly. I don't care what you paint it like it is Corporate irresponsibility and greed for profits. If you haven't had any problems count yourself lucky and for Gods Sake stop telling those that do it is something they are doing wrong. Bill
 
Sure Lamont get rid of limp mode and just make the thing stop dead. If they had done that I would be dead and have stopped dead on the road 2 dozen or more times. They need to back off on the computer a bit and get more down to basics of keeping it safe and reliable for not just a motorhead but a normal consumer. I will say one thing my now present RT has only gone into limp mode about 5 times or less. The first one it was and endless battle, this one is far less of a battle.
I didn't say shut it down while you were moving did I? If there is a problem don't let it start and if the problem happens while you're driving it then when you go to start it the next time shut it down. I had a limp home mode kick in on my last trip to the west coast on the RT and I was in a turn passing a truck going down hill. There was no reason for it to do that and when I parked and made some phone calls in the middle of nowhere it just fixed itself, no rime or reason, that's what I'm talking about getting rid of.
 
Hold on just a second Bill...
Believe it or not; I am on your side... As I recall it; I felt that any issue that sets off the "fire alarms" needs to be addressed. When a dealer just hooks it up to BUDS and can't find anything so they send you on your un-Merry way; they've done you a dis-service! Hold their feet to the fire and tell them to actually take a look under the Tupperware and FIND the problem!
The problem is that it takes time, money and manpower that a dealer alone may not be albe to absorb; tell them to have BRP send a tech guy down with his equipment then.
And all of this does require a little bit of patience on the part of the poor guy who's making the payments or not getting to ride his Spyder...
 
Hold on just a second Bill...
Believe it or not; I am on your side... As I recall it; I felt that any issue that sets off the "fire alarms" needs to be addressed. When a dealer just hooks it up to BUDS and can't find anything so they send you on your un-Merry way; they've done you a dis-service! Hold their feet to the fire and tell them to actually take a look under the Tupperware and FIND the problem!
The problem is that it takes time, money and manpower that a dealer alone may not be albe to absorb; tell them to have BRP send a tech guy down with his equipment then.
And all of this does require a little bit of patience on the part of the poor guy who's making the payments or not getting to ride his Spyder...


Yesterday they replaced the steering sensor ; took it out for test today at 3 pm, already 5 in Canada, of couse it failed. Dealer closed Monday they will call BRP tuesday. By
the time we replace every part they could have just given me a new one. They are talking about replacing the brain and the wireing harness next. WILL SEE.
 
Back
Top