Bob Denman
New member
You have an agenda that you're not admitting to. nojoke
No more responses...
No more responses...
I SAY ....... N O
osm, i know many won't agree but i feel people should have true freedom up until they negatively affect others. i don't believe
in paying for someone else's mistakes. if you want that freedom then you have to take responsibility for your actions.
What is your definition of true freedom? Thanks!
If you want to do drugs fine, but if your drug use hurts others.........
we all know cousin marrying like in islam produces certain birth defects, in pakistan it is common & ~30% of those have
severe problems but it is their country to do as they like, over here we would be paying with our tax dollars to support the
children for the rest of their lives.
everything is choice & consequence but the only way to prevent is for the individual to pay not society.
are any of you aware on judge judy when she berates someone for whatever and screams "you idiot you are going to pay"
she is lying since she knows the show will pay and pays the defendant for appearing. how can anyone learn from this?
back to the point, true freedomw is taking responsibility for your personal actions and accepting it.
You have an agenda that you're not admitting to. nojoke
No more responses...
You have an agenda that you're not admitting to. nojoke
No more responses...
Will there be more addicts if every drug is readily available and fully legal?
I would say no because I believe the drugs are already readily available weather legal or not. The "addicts" are certainly getting them somewhere and it appears they are doing so without issue as long as they have $ to purchase.
When is the last time you walked into Wal-Mart and looked at a display of heroin, lsd, and cocaine? Never mind the people who are already addicted or fighting the addiction, what about all people who would tempted to experiment with highly addicting drugs? There will be many, many more addicts, period. The more of those drugs the more addicts there will be.
One of the roles of the government is to protect its people and that includes protecting them from their selves, if need be, especially the vulnerable. In any society there will be those who are vulnerable and need help. Who in their right mind would pupose an idea to make money off of vulnerable people? Well, besides planned parenthood?
When is the last time you walked into Wal-Mart and looked at a display of heroin, lsd, and cocaine? Never mind the people who are already addicted or fighting the addiction, what about all people who would tempted to experiment with highly addicting drugs? There will be many, many more addicts, period. The more of those drugs the more addicts there will be.
One of the roles of the government is to protect its people and that includes protecting them from their selves, if need be, especially the vulnerable. In any society there will be those who are vulnerable and need help. Who in their right mind would pupose an idea to make money off of vulnerable people? Well, besides planned parenthood?
One of the roles of the government is to protect its people and that includes protecting them from their selves, I don't agree with you on this. Yes, a role of government is to protect its people but I don't agree with the "from themselves part". If a person wants to voluntarily take part in activities that they may need protection from (which will be different for different people......drugs, extreme sports, gambling, unprotected sex, riding without a helmet, etc, etc,) then they have every right to do that and they will have to deal with whatever consequences arise from that.
You can buy any of the drugs you mentioned right outside of Walmart (and clubs, schools, convenience stores, etc....dealers are mobile) in the parking lot without an issue. There is no display with a big yellow price drop smiley face but they are available and for sale. Legal or illegal, sold in Walmart or not sold in Walmart if people want access to drugs for experimentation or use they are going to find a way to do that.
How is this any different than alcohol or tobacco? You can go into a lot of stores and legally purchase alcohol. Alcohol is a mind altering drug that can cause physical problems and health issues to those who use (and sometimes to those who don't use) it. Using your logic everyone in the USA will be an alcoholic and heavy smoker simply because these things are sold in stores
Thanks for the reply! If drugs were to be legalized and sold openly in the market, they will inevitably become promoted to the masses. When these drugs are used out of their initial context for healing and medical purpose, they become a great evil, an evil that enslaves people, at times instantly. Normally speaking, heroins addiction qualities far outway alcohols. Using drugs that are designed for medical purposes for recreational purposes is an intrinsic evil. Alcohol in itself, used in moderation is not.
Any addiction that consumes one to the point of leading them away from the purpose they were created for actually enslaves them. In order to do the most good we need to start at the margins and work our way out. Drug addicts need help, they are people like you and I. Yes, they made bad choices for what ever reason, but we all have at one time or another. Feeding the monster of addiction is not charitable, it harms human life. Making money off that harm is even worse.