• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

GS vs F3 question

wyliec

New member
I asked this in someone else's thread, and no one responded. So, I'll start a thread, and ask again.

When the Spyder GS came out, it was advertised 0-60 mph in 4.5 seconds. Since there have been many here who post on how quick the F3 is as compared to the GS/RS/RSS, what is the 0-60 mph time?
 
Okay then...!!

quick scan on the web produced a claimed F3 0-60 speed achived in 4.8 seconds...but thats the web depends on who weaved it...:roflblack:
 
quick scan on the web produced a claimed F3 0-60 speed achived in 4.8 seconds...but thats the web depends on who weaved it...:roflblack:

The 0-60 mph for the GS was from BRP. I would think they would have the 0-60 for the F3 listed somewhere.
 
I've been looking for the f-3 stats for months surprised that they are not highlighting the performance.


Sempert out,
 
:popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:

Never did time trials on my 2008 GS to see how it compared with the factory "specs."

Yes, I am also surprised that the F3's speed specs are not being talked about. We do here a lot about smoked tires...?
 
Let's face it; buying an F-3 (Or ANY Spyder!), based upon the performance numbers; is like buying a car JUST because you like the color!

They are so much more than that... :thumbup:
 
attachment.php
 
Let's face it; buying an F-3 (Or ANY Spyder!), based upon the performance numbers; is like buying a car JUST because you like the color!

They are so much more than that... :thumbup:

Yes, I know that. But, we keep hearing how fast they are. If you pick up any car magazine (motorcycles may be the same), they list the 0-60 mph times as a reference point. And, now I see Lamont's post of 4.8 seconds. The GS was supposedly 4.5 seconds. I'm not trying to debate how it handles, or how it feels in tight or sweeping turns, or if you like its looks. I was just trying to see how slow the GS/RS is compared to the F3, based on all the smoking tire comments, and how fast it is. So, it looks like an F3 at 4.8 seconds is faster than a GS/RS at 4.5 seconds.:dontknow: There will probably be comments that once past 60 mph, the F3 smokes the GS/RS.

And, by the way, Bob- Based on comments I read here, I believe some buy based on color.
 
I was under the impression that the strength of this motor was at the low end, and not when you are headed for triple digits. But i could be wrong. One thing I noticed in the short ride I took is that it seems to be happiest in the lower end of the RPM range. My RS does not really come alive until after 5000 rpm. I think the delivery is different, but am willing to bet performance is similar. One is a spinner motor and the other is a torque monster. I am interested ti see how the F3s fair in the drags @Spyderfest.

Just sayin'............
 
"Smoked tires" do not equate to acceleration. The back end of the F3 is relatively light: take the weight off the tire and even low HP will light it up nicely. Drag times are going to be dependent on the hook up.

We've owned '08 and '10 GS/RS, and currently own a '14 ST and the '15 F3. The F3 is definitely faster by a bit over the ST. The F3 does have a broader usable power band but it does make some nice HP above 4500 RPM. I don't remember the precise formulae, but it takes exponentially higher power to cut 0.1 seconds off of ETs.

HP is for show but torque moves the load.

Wayne
 
RS vs. F3 / F3 vs. RS

Maybe someone on this site has lined them up head to head. Probably close 0-60 but I'm sure the torque and extra 15 hp or so of the F3 kick in at some point. Anyway, anyone that purchased these bikes as a racing machine may be somewhat disappointed. They are plenty fast enough to get yourself in trouble real quick but more than that they sure are fun to ride. Love my:spyder2:!!
 
Just based on the looks alone..................................


F3 Wins !!!!!!
It's one bad azz looking machine !!!!!!
 
Wylie,
Having that 1330 under my right wrist; I can tell you that it is VERY quick off of the line.
The question might just be:
"Can the RS's top-end, make up for whatever jump thatthe F-3 gets on it off the line?" :dontknow:
This question WILL get answered! :D
 
I don't want to bust anyone out but a couple of months ago I offered to race someone on an F3 that everyone knows with my GS during Spyderfest. I even suggested we play it up on Spyderlovers to help bring attention to Spyderfest. I'm sorry to say to this date my challenge has not been accepted. :pray::popcorn::mad::banghead::)
 
HP is for show but torque moves the load.

Wayne

This displays a fundamental misunderstanding of power. Horsepower is a measure of power or work, torque is a measure of force.
Horsepower, irrespective of RPM is what matters, that's why all industrial equipment is rated in horsepower. You van use gear reduction to create torque, but not horsepower.

FWIW - There is little to suggest the F3 is faster than the early RS / GS - The Extra weight of the F3 is not compensated for by an extra 9 horsepower IMO.
 
Last edited:
I respectfully disagree... :sour:
You will always do better, if you've got a nice, meaty torque curve to back up a big horsepower number. :thumbup:
 
Neither are drag bikes that was not there purpose. If i was looking for that would definately go back to 2 wheels. Would be intereting on a heads up . I would give the edge to the gs or rs.:gaah:
 
My 2012 RS is listed at 699 lbs dry and had 106 stock hp. My Two Brothers pipe is supposed to add about 4 hp so that brings it up to 110 hp. The TB pipe also sheds a little weight. (I more than make up for that at 235lbs)

I have gotten pretty good at taking off fast from a stop and getting up to 60 mph. It seems to be near the 4.5-5 second range. I would always like a little more power, but I bet all around the RS and F3 are pretty similar in the "fast" department and the biggest difference will be handling and rider skills in overall performance.
 
Back
Top