• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Elka Stage 1+ vs. Stage 5

Hokiev

New member
I have a question for those who might have changed from Elka Stage 1+ to Stage 5 on a RT.

I am considering replacing the Rear Shock (to improve my wife's hard ride) and front shocks to help with ride. I currently have the stock shocks.

I would consider myself an "normal" rider, i.e., not taking curves aggressively so don't know if the cost difference in the Stage 1+ vs. Stage 5 is worth the money. Don't have a problem investing the $$ if any have tried both in think it is worth the added costs for this type of riding.

Your thoughts are appreciated.
 
Sounds like the 1+ will work fine for you. I have both and I like the 5 but I push it more than some.
 
I will bet with the Stage 1+ you will see yourself going around corners faster after you use them a short while!
 
I'm not sure if mine are stage 1's or not. I do know that I purchased mine a VERY short time after Lamont recommended the Elka's back in either March or April of 2010. Consequently, I would assume that they are the "early model" Elka's (1's)

First, let me say that I love my Elka's, especially after I have finally dialed them in. I'm 6' tall, weigh about 195 lbs (give or take a couple). I ride 80% alone and my riding style is moderate to moderately aggressive. Flarda does not have all that many twisties.
I have a 2010 RT-S if that makes any difference in the equation.

My rebound is set at 15 and the shock setting is at 8.75 inches. I have the stock shocks in the back. My wife only weighs 115 lbs so the stock shocks have worked adequately for her.

Again, all I can say is that I consider the Elka purchase my best mod that I've made on my spyder. Well......Let me qualify that. I do love my Corbin seat too.

Hope this helps.

Chris
 
I met John from Elka at the Toronto International Motorcycle Show today and we discussed my Elka requirements for the RT. He indicated that the Stage 1 Elka shocks are more than adequate for the type of riding most of us are talking about and that the Stage 5's would be most suited for those who drive their machines in a "very, very spirited fashion". :yikes: He mentioned Lamont by name as one of the candidates who certainly reaps the benefits of the beefed up handling characteristics available with the Stage 5 shocks on his RT.

In short, he recommended the Stage 1 to me and told me that I should wait for Spyderfest at the end of April to try them out on my machine before I make a purchasing decision. I will take him up on that offer.

Nice to deal with a company that attempts to guide you into the purchase of an item that meets your needs and does not in any way try to up sell you to a product that is more costly without giving you a higher level of required performance.:thumbup:
 
We have the stage 1+ added to our 2010 spyder RT.

2 up I set it to 18 for a comfortable ride with my wife on the back
for a long relaxing ride I set it to 20.

BUT, when I want to keep up with my friends on a "performance testing" ride I set it at 12.
Always nice to see people on a sports-bike looking up and seeing an RT close after some nice peg (theirs) scraping roads.

Andy
 
Back
Top