:agree::agree:Any person who chooses to operate a motorcycle without a helmet would be required to carry life and disability insurance that will cover the medical costs of caring for a a brain injured person for as long as that person will survive. I am sure an insurance company actuary could come up with the relevant premium for such coverage.
This solution does have a flaw of course. The police would have to set up motorcycle checkpoints to make sure helmet less riders have the appropriate coverage.:banghead:
Maybe it is just easier to obey helmet laws. Less intrusive:thumbup:
And, what about cell phone usage when driving? Should you have a freedom of choice there to kill others on the road?
A few years past there was a fire marshall in my neck of the woods who was texting and ran into a bicyclist and killed her. It was strange, no fines, no loss of license. Some laws need to be stricter and applied equally.
TEXTING isn't the same issue! That is a safety issue like drunken driving. A person not wearing a helmet isn't going to cause someone to hit me head on. That is comparing apples to oranges here. The only safety issue with not wearing a helmet is to the person who decides not to wear one! I also agree about the liability insurance. Others shouldn't have to pay for someone elses choice.
I never ride without my helmet!! I think it's common sense to wear one, but to each his/her own I say.
:agree::agree:Agreed!!
Agreed!!
I thought there was a forum rule about political discussions? This should be closed... QUOTE]
Interesting...
As motorcyclists, (or Spyderists!); pretty near every discussion is going to fall somewhere near "freedom" and how it is either being threatened :gaah: or being fought for... :thumbup:
If I were to try and read the administrator's mind, (Horrible thought! :shocked, I would bet more than a nickel that they were looking to avoid the whole Red/Blue whatever fistfights that can occur when my guy is better than sliced bread and mother's milk and your guy is just a :cus:
pps:
We DO have a lot of fun with helmets and shift-points though... :thumbup:
Any person who chooses to operate a motorcycle without a helmet would be required to carry life and disability insurance that will cover the medical costs of caring for a a brain injured person for as long as that person will survive. I am sure an insurance company actuary could come up with the relevant premium for such coverage.
This solution does have a flaw of course. The police would have to set up motorcycle checkpoints to make sure helmet less riders have the appropriate coverage.:banghead:
Maybe it is just easier to obey helmet laws. Less intrusive:thumbup:
Always, But I think it should be your choice, If you want to be an idiot so be it. That is what America is suppose to be about FREEDOM
:agree:I always worn my helmet! To me it's a matter of common sense. But, I believe it's YOUR choice as long as you foot the bill. We should not have to pay for your choice when you decide to go without a helmet.