• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Do upgraded shocks on the f3's make a significant difference for noral street riding

Wildrice

Wildrice

New member
I'm familar with track racing shocks but I was curious if upgrades made a significant inprovement on a surface 'street or freeway riding with occassional bumps & small irregular surfaces; I have the 2015 F3's.

Shock mfg's & model# for F3's & is the rear shock upgrade as noticeable as the front shock upgrades..
Thank you kindly for your experienced feedback. I know how to spell "normal", my fingers don't:-(
Darrell
 
Last edited:
Depends on what one calls normal....and how big a person one is. I'm 5'10" and 170#. I felt the rear shock was too soft and it was also non-adjustable for preload. The front shocks gain adjustable damping although it is rebound damping only. I also have the stock RT torsion bar in place of the stock F3 bar.

You will find strong opinion of Fox vs Elka. I went with the Fox all around. The ride is very flat in corners, allowing for more precision in the corners. Does it ride better? Probably a bit stiffer than stock. The rear definitely rides better.

My better half has an ST Ltd which weighs about the same as my F3S. The ST also has a BajaRon torsion bar on it. Comparing the two and allowing for the different seating position, my set up allows for more independent wheel response to single sided bumps but flatter through corners. The rear is a much smoother ride, firmly absorbing impact but not harsh.

Wayne
 
Last edited:
Yes

Wildrice said:
I'm familar with track racing shocks but I was curious if upgrades made a significant inprovement on a surface 'street or freeway riding with occassional bumps & small irregular surfaces; I have the 2015 F3's.

Shock mfg's & model# for F3's & is the rear shock upgrade as noticeable as the front shock upgrades..
Thank you kindly for your experienced feedback. I know how to spell "normal", my fingers don't:-(
Darrell
Click to expand...
I did order a elka SHock for the rear makes a nice ride
joe
 
I had no issues with the stock shocks but when I talked to Len from Pittbull Powersports and told him what I'll be doing with my F3s he suggested Elkas.. I just finished installing them on Friday n went for an 80 mi ride this morning.. The Spyder is a lot flatter in the turns n the rear shock delivers a smoother ride on stutter bumps than the stock rear... I'm very pleased so far n can't wait to take the wifey for a ride but she has a broken foot right now.. I have the stage two and the rear w the remote hyd preload... Changing the loading of the bike for just riding around town to loading up for a loooooong ride w wifey n loaded luggage necessitated that option for me...
 
Hi Darrell,

the he oem rear shock is garbage as it is so under sprung, it can barely hold its own weight... Why Mother BRP and other manufacturers cheap out on such a vital part that so closely affects a riders experience and opinion amazes me...

Call Elka and have them build you a shock based on your weight and riding style and you will have a new machine and you kidneys and lower back will thank you...

Mark
 
shocks

pauly1 said:
Depends on what one calls normal....and how big a person one is. I'm 5'10" and 170#. I felt the rear shock was too soft and it was also non-adjustable for preload. The front shocks gain adjustable damping although it is rebound damping only. I also have the stock RT torsion bar in place of the stock F3 bar.

You will find strong opinion of Fox vs Elka. I went with the Fox all around. The ride is very flat in corners, allowing for more precision in the corners. Does it ride better? Probably a bit stiffer than stock. The rear definitely rides better.

My better half has an ST Ltd which weighs about the same as my F3S. The ST also has a BajaRon torsion bar on it. Comparing the two and allowing for the different seating position, my set up allows for more independent wheel response to single sided bumps but flatter through corners. The rear is a much smoother ride, firmly absorbing impact but not harsh.

Wayne
Click to expand...

Hi Wayne

Would the Spyder RS rear shock be different to the F3 shock in the rear?
 
The RS is a significantly lighter than the F3, approximately 75#, so at minimum the spring would be too light. The RS shock has a cam-adjustable spring tension but not damping (at least on the 2008 through 2010 models with which I am familiar). Because of that difference I've not even looked at doing a swap or comparison.

Wayne
 
Mike said:
I had no issues with the stock shocks but when I talked to Len from Pittbull Powersports and told him what I'll be doing with my F3s he suggested Elkas.. I just finished installing them on Friday n went for an 80 mi ride this morning.. The Spyder is a lot flatter in the turns n the rear shock delivers a smoother ride on stutter bumps than the stock rear... I'm very pleased so far n can't wait to take the wifey for a ride but she has a broken foot right now.. I have the stage two and the rear w the remote hyd preload... Changing the loading of the bike for just riding around town to loading up for a loooooong ride w wifey n loaded luggage necessitated that option for me...
Click to expand...

Which stage elkas did you go with


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top