Bob Denman
New member
Death :shocked:; from a thousand papercuts then? :gaah:
Agreed. That is my theory as well. After 4500 miles, I have had none of the issues that others have reported and it was proven when I pulled my plugs a couple of weeks ago to check them out. One plug looks perfect and the other is a little rich. I am thinking about skipping the ECM update because I'm not sure I need it, or I already have it. I bet that not all Spyders have the same map as tweaks are often made during a production run.
Less likely that they have different maps than that sensor variations would cause most variation.
Be careful on that, if your bike goes in for any kind of service you may get that update anyway. Your dealer may do it without asking since it's an "across the board" campaign. I don't think they would do part of it (fuse boxes) and not do the update because there is money involved for them.
But they were wonderfully presented... :clap: nojokeThese are just my observations and my opinion.....they are not carved in stone and may possibly be misguided!
But they were wonderfully presented... :clap: nojoke
I wonder if the sensors were also supplied by a low bidder? :shocked:
Hold your horses there young Bob...I haven't finished editing it yet!!!![]()
OJ UK kind of brought up a point I wonder about. The problems are well documented on 2013 RTs and some what STs but I've seen no mention about the RS. Either there are almost no RSs out there or (it seems to me) there the problems are more related to the style of the spyder and differences in them.
I am a little concerned that making changes in the ECM Software on the spyders that don't have problems may cause problems. So once the change is made, does anyone know if it can be reversed?
the ST has a different frame than the RS....things were moved around on the ST but not the RS
i need a dictionary to read oj uk posts
That's what happens when you get a quality education... :thumbup: