Bob Denman
New member
That's why I didn't major in anything that required brainpower in college...
pps:
Thanks!

Thanks!
My honda Magna will try and make a baked potato of you in town with temps above 90, the radiator heat has to go somewhere.
Could the boiling fuel issue actually have something more to do with fuel tank venting than the actual temperatures that are reached? :dontknow:
According to what I have read this afternoon. The higher the pressure of the container, the higher the boiling point will be.
However, reducing the pressure by removing the cap could result in boiling...
I wonder how many ST's with heat issues have fog lights installed instead of the open air intakes...
Had fog lights on my RS installed after a few thousand miles. Did not see any increase in heat. Something has changed in the heat trapping on the ST.
I wonder how many ST's with heat issues have fog lights installed instead of the open air intakes...
It's really not that simple. You need places for the air to come in, but also to exit. You need space to allow the air to flow in critical locations, and you need to block off paths that could bypass where you want the flow. On top of it all, the aerodynamics need to be considered. A hole may do the opposite of what you want it to when air starts to flow into it or past it. A hole in a dead air space can flow nothing at all. Add the problem of trying to cool anything with a flow of 110 degree ambient air, and things begin to get complicated. This is a job for a batch of engineers, lots of instrumentation, and a wind tunnel.This is why I say that somebody needs to be brave enough to cut some extra venting up in the front of the bike to try and improve the airflow under all of the Tupperware...
I have fog lights on the ST
However, reducing the pressure by removing the cap could result in boiling... what does one do when you need gas? the cap has to come off to keep traveling
You are correct. You can't compare a quick trip of 20 to 50 miles to riding 650 to 750 miles in a day. I will have had my new Spyder for 2 months tomorrow and I already have over 8,000 miles on it which is more than some owners put on in 2 years.
It's really not that simple. You need places for the air to come in, but also to exit. You need space to allow the air to flow in critical locations, and you need to block off paths that could bypass where you want the flow. On top of it all, the aerodynamics need to be considered. A hole may do the opposite of what you want it to when air starts to flow into it or past it. A hole in a dead air space can flow nothing at all. Add the problem of trying to cool anything with a flow of 110 degree ambient air, and things begin to get complicated. This is a job for a batch of engineers, lots of instrumentation, and a wind tunnel.
I have to disagree with this. It does not make any sense.
My Spyder comes up to temp pretty fast. So if I do say 100 miles on the same highway you might do 800 miles, how does it get hotter? If that were the case and the spyder gets hotter every mile, for sure this would be something EVERYONE notices. But that is not the case. Sorry but physically this makes no sense. The heat output is pretty constant at running temp. So no matter how many miles you put on a year vs someone that does not, tell me how cooking a foot would be different logically?
Sorry... that argument makes no sense.
I think I might be glad I did not get a 2013... It's all "redesigned" but sometimes that does not mean it is better.
My 2011 RTS is not giving me any of this burning foot or leg issues. Just today I was riding home in bumper to bumper traffic and it was 82 ambient (Spyder ambient read 89). Simply no heat issues here.... I guess I will call myself lucky? :bowdown:
Bob
It might also do exactly the opposite, "stuffing" the air into the opening with nowhere to exit, and making things worse. It could also just be ineffective, due to ground effects which limit air flow underneath. I might add that heat flows upward, not naturally downward, the splash pans probably don't affect the gas tank area much. No way to know the results without computer or wind tunnel analysis. BTW, the splash pans on the 2013s are not readily removeable.If you remove the bottom splash panels, which by the way do nothing to keep water out during a rainstorm, there would be a good path for heat to dissipate while moving. Air rushing underneath the Spyder would create a Venturi effect drawing air from the interior downward and out the back. The problem as you mentioned is that there is not enough air entering the engine compartment. I think that front scoops plus removal of the splash panels will create a positive flow through the interior. Removal of the stock air intake in favor of the Kewmetal intake will creat additional air space and flow area.
It's really not that simple. You need places for the air to come in, but also to exit. You need space to allow the air to flow in critical locations, and you need to block off paths that could bypass where you want the flow. On top of it all, the aerodynamics need to be considered. A hole may do the opposite of what you want it to when air starts to flow into it or past it. A hole in a dead air space can flow nothing at all. Add the problem of trying to cool anything with a flow of 110 degree ambient air, and things begin to get complicated. This is a job for a batch of engineers, lots of instrumentation, and a wind tunnel.